Literature DB >> 33373583

CellBox: Interpretable Machine Learning for Perturbation Biology with Application to the Design of Cancer Combination Therapy.

Bo Yuan1, Ciyue Shen2, Augustin Luna3, Anil Korkut4, Debora S Marks5, John Ingraham6, Chris Sander7.   

Abstract

Systematic perturbation of cells followed by comprehensive measurements of molecular and phenotypic responses provides informative data resources for constructing computational models of cell biology. Models that generalize well beyond training data can be used to identify combinatorial perturbations of potential therapeutic interest. Major challenges for machine learning on large biological datasets are to find global optima in a complex multidimensional space and mechanistically interpret the solutions. To address these challenges, we introduce a hybrid approach that combines explicit mathematical models of cell dynamics with a machine-learning framework, implemented in TensorFlow. We tested the modeling framework on a perturbation-response dataset of a melanoma cell line after drug treatments. The models can be efficiently trained to describe cellular behavior accurately. Even though completely data driven and independent of prior knowledge, the resulting de novo network models recapitulate some known interactions. The approach is readily applicable to various kinetic models of cell biology. A record of this paper's Transparent Peer Review process is included in the Supplemental Information.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; cell dynamics; combinatorial therapy; dynamical systems; interpretability; machine learning; network pharmacology; perturbation biology; systems biology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33373583     DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  15 in total

Review 1.  The use of machine learning to discover regulatory networks controlling biological systems.

Authors:  Rossin Erbe; Jessica Gore; Kelly Gemmill; Daria A Gaykalova; Elana J Fertig
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Vivarium: an interface and engine for integrative multiscale modeling in computational biology.

Authors:  Eran Agmon; Ryan K Spangler; Christopher J Skalnik; William Poole; Shayn M Peirce; Jerry H Morrison; Markus W Covert
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Sherry Bhalla; Alessandro Laganà
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  MECHANISTIC AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELS OF CELL SIGNALING: TOOLS FOR FUNDAMENTAL DISCOVERY AND RATIONAL DESIGN OF THERAPY.

Authors:  Paul J Myers; Sung Hyun Lee; Matthew J Lazzara
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-09

5.  A flux-based machine learning model to simulate the impact of pathogen metabolic heterogeneity on drug interactions.

Authors:  Carolina H Chung; Sriram Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PNAS Nexus       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Generative modeling of single-cell time series with PRESCIENT enables prediction of cell trajectories with interventions.

Authors:  Grace Hui Ting Yeo; Sachit D Saksena; David K Gifford
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Overcoming Immunological Challenges Limiting Capsid-Mediated Gene Therapy With Machine Learning.

Authors:  Anna Z Wec; Kathy S Lin; Jamie C Kwasnieski; Sam Sinai; Jeff Gerold; Eric D Kelsic
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Vec2image: an explainable artificial intelligence model for the feature representation and classification of high-dimensional biological data by vector-to-image conversion.

Authors:  Hui Tang; Xiangtian Yu; Rui Liu; Tao Zeng
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 9.  Differentiable biology: using deep learning for biophysics-based and data-driven modeling of molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Mohammed AlQuraishi; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review.

Authors:  Barbara Kenner; Suresh T Chari; David Kelsen; David S Klimstra; Stephen J Pandol; Michael Rosenthal; Anil K Rustgi; James A Taylor; Adam Yala; Noura Abul-Husn; Dana K Andersen; David Bernstein; Søren Brunak; Marcia Irene Canto; Yonina C Eldar; Elliot K Fishman; Julie Fleshman; Vay Liang W Go; Jane M Holt; Bruce Field; Ann Goldberg; William Hoos; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Debiao Li; Graham Lidgard; Anirban Maitra; Lynn M Matrisian; Sung Poblete; Laura Rothschild; Chris Sander; Lawrence H Schwartz; Uri Shalit; Sudhir Srivastava; Brian Wolpin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.