Literature DB >> 33372748

Sepsis-Associated Mortality, Resource Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Kelly Farrah1,2,3,4,5,6, Lauralyn McIntyre1,2,4, Christopher J Doig5, Robert Talarico3, Monica Taljaard1,2, Murray Krahn6, Dean Fergusson1,2, Alan J Forster2,3, Doug Coyle1, Kednapa Thavorn1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine long-term mortality, resource utilization, and healthcare costs in sepsis patients compared to hospitalized nonsepsis controls.
DESIGN: Propensity-matched population-based cohort study using administrative data.
SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: We identified a cohort of adults (≥ 18) admitted to hospitals in Ontario between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, with follow-up to March 31, 2017. Sepsis patients were flagged using a validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision-coded algorithm (Sepsis-2 definition), including cases with organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) and without (nonsevere). Remaining hospitalized patients were potential controls. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 on propensity score, age, sex, admission type, and admission date.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences in mortality, rehospitalization, hospital length of stay, and healthcare costs were estimated, adjusting for remaining confounders using Cox regression and generalized estimating equations. Of 270,669 sepsis cases, 196,922 (73%) were successfully matched: 64,204 had severe and 132,718 nonsevere sepsis (infection without organ dysfunction). Over follow-up (median 2.0 yr), severe sepsis patients had higher mortality rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.63-1.68). Both severe and nonsevere sepsis patients had higher rehospitalization rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.50-1.55 and hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.40-1.43, respectively). Incremental costs (Canadian dollar 2018) in sepsis cases versus controls at 1-year were: $29,238 (95% CI, $28,568-$29,913) for severe and $9,475 (95% CI, $9,150-$9,727) for nonsevere sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe sepsis was associated with substantially higher long-term risk of death, rehospitalization, and healthcare costs, highlighting the need for effective postdischarge care for sepsis survivors.
Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33372748     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Assessment of Social Determinants of Health in Postsepsis Mortality and Readmission: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryan S Hilton; Katrina Hauschildt; Milan Shah; Marc Kowalkowski; Stephanie Taylor
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-07-29

2.  Sepsis hospitalization and risk of subsequent cardiovascular events in adults: a population-based matched cohort study.

Authors:  Federico Angriman; Laura C Rosella; Patrick R Lawler; Dennis T Ko; Hannah Wunsch; Damon C Scales
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 41.787

3.  The prognostic utility of protein C as a biomarker for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa Catenacci; Fatima Sheikh; Kush Patel; Alison E Fox-Robichaud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Healthcare Utilization and Costs in Sepsis Survivors in Germany-Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Konrad F R Schmidt; Katharina Huelle; Thomas Reinhold; Hallie C Prescott; Rebekka Gehringer; Michael Hartmann; Thomas Lehmann; Friederike Mueller; Konrad Reinhart; Nico Schneider; Maya J Schroevers; Robert P Kosilek; Horst C Vollmar; Christoph Heintze; Jochen S Gensichen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Prior Distribution Estimation of Monitored Information in the Intensive Care Unit with the Hidden Markov Model and Decision Tree Methods.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Xiaokai Nie; Guofei Pang; Siyuan Qiu; Kehan Shi; Changqing Wang; Bingqi Zhao; Yidan Huo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Sustained elevation of soluble B- and T- lymphocyte attenuator predicts long-term mortality in patients with bacteremia and sepsis.

Authors:  Anna Lange; Sara Cajander; Anders Magnuson; Kristoffer Strålin; Olof Hultgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aberrant blood MALT1 and its relevance with multiple organic dysfunctions, T helper cells, inflammation, and mortality risk of sepsis patients.

Authors:  Yibin Wang; Qinghe Huang; Fuyun He
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Effects of Reversal of Hypotension on Cerebral Microcirculation and Metabolism in Experimental Sepsis.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Fuhong Su; Xinrong He; Lorenzo Peluso; Katia Donadello; Sabino Scolletta; Daniel De Backer; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-18

9.  Factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Ge; Feng-Zhi Li; Bang-Chuan Hu; Li-Hong Wang; Ding-Yuan Ren
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Independent Risk Factors for Sepsis-Associated Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Septic Shock.

Authors:  Won Soek Yang; Youn-Jung Kim; Seung Mok Ryoo; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.