Literature DB >> 33372653

Adaptive evolution of nontransitive fitness in yeast.

Sean W Buskirk1, Alecia B Rokes1, Gregory I Lang1.   

Abstract

A common misconception is that evolution is a linear 'march of progress', where each organism along a line of descent is more fit than all those that came before it. Rejecting this misconception implies that evolution is nontransitive: a series of adaptive events will, on occasion, produce organisms that are less fit compared to a distant ancestor. Here we identify a nontransitive evolutionary sequence in a 1000-generation yeast evolution experiment. We show that nontransitivity arises due to adaptation in the yeast nuclear genome combined with the stepwise deterioration of an intracellular virus, which provides an advantage over viral competitors within host cells. Extending our analysis, we find that nearly half of our ~140 populations experience multilevel selection, fixing adaptive mutations in both the nuclear and viral genomes. Our results provide a mechanistic case-study for the adaptive evolution of nontransitivity due to multilevel selection in a 1000-generation host/virus evolution experiment.
© 2020, Buskirk et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S. cerevisiae; evolutionary biology; experimental evolution; killer virus; nontransitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33372653      PMCID: PMC7886323          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.62238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  60 in total

1.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population.

Authors:  P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks.

Authors:  José Rojas-Echenique; Stefano Allesina
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Rules of engagement: molecular insights from host-virus arms races.

Authors:  Matthew D Daugherty; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Evolution of defective-interfering double-stranded RNAs of the yeast killer virus.

Authors:  W P Kane; D F Pietras; J A Bruenn
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Experimental tests of host-virus coevolution in natural killer yeast strains.

Authors:  M D Pieczynska; R Korona; J A G M De Visser
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape.

Authors:  Daniel J Kvitek; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A Rapid Method for Sequencing Double-Stranded RNAs Purified from Yeasts and the Identification of a Potent K1 Killer Toxin Isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Angela M Crabtree; Emily A Kizer; Samuel S Hunter; James T Van Leuven; Daniel D New; Matthew W Fagnan; Paul A Rowley
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. XI. Rejection of non-transitive interactions as cause of declining rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Whole genome, whole population sequencing reveals that loss of signaling networks is the major adaptive strategy in a constant environment.

Authors:  Daniel J Kvitek; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

1.  Antagonism between killer yeast strains as an experimental model for biological nucleation dynamics.

Authors:  Andrea Giometto; David R Nelson; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Overdominant and partially dominant mutations drive clonal adaptation in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dimitra Aggeli; Daniel A Marad; Xianan Liu; Sean W Buskirk; Sasha F Levy; Gregory I Lang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Phenotypic and molecular evolution across 10,000 generations in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Shreyas Gopalakrishnan; Juhee Goyal; Megan E Dillingham; Christopher W Bakerlee; Parris T Humphrey; Tanush Jagdish; Elizabeth R Jerison; Katya Kosheleva; Katherine R Lawrence; Jiseon Min; Alief Moulana; Angela M Phillips; Julia C Piper; Ramya Purkanti; Artur Rego-Costa; Michael J McDonald; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Failure to progress.

Authors:  Duncan Greig; Jasmine Ono
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The Role of Ancestral Duplicated Genes in Adaptation to Growth on Lactate, a Non-Fermentable Carbon Source for the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Florian Mattenberger; Mario A Fares; Christina Toft; Beatriz Sabater-Muñoz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Segregational Drift Constrains the Evolutionary Rate of Prokaryotic Plasmids.

Authors:  Ana Garoña; Nils F Hülter; Devani Romero Picazo; Tal Dagan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Evolution of innate behavioral strategies through competitive population dynamics.

Authors:  Tong Liang; Braden A W Brinkman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Using colony size to measure fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James H Miller; Vincent J Fasanello; Ping Liu; Emery R Longan; Carlos A Botero; Justin C Fay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.