Literature DB >> 33371784

Predicting Outcome of Acquired Brain Injury by the Evolution of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity Signs.

Lucia F Lucca1, Antonio De Tanti2, Francesca Cava3, Annamaria Romoli4, Rita Formisano5, Federico Scarponi6, Anna Estraneo4,7, Diana Frattini8, Paolo Tonin1, Chiara Bertolino2, Pamela Salucci3, Bahia Hakiki4, Mariagrazia D'Ippolito5, Mauro Zampolini6, Orsola Masotta9, Silvia Premoselli8, Matteo Interlenghi10, Christian Salvatore11,10, Annalisa Polidori10, Antonio Cerasa12.   

Abstract

In this multi-center study, we provide a systematic evaluation of the clinical variability associated with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) to determine how these signs can impact outcomes. A total of 156 ABI patients with a disorder of consciousness (DoC) were admitted to neurorehabilitation subacute units (intensive rehabilitation unit; IRU) and evaluated at baseline (T0), after 4 months from event (T1), and at discharge (T2). The outcome measure was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, whereas age, sex, etiology, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-r), Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS), Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI), PSH-Assessment Measure (PSH-AM) scores and other clinical features were considered as predictive factors. A machine learning (ML) approach was used to identify the best predictive model of clinical outcomes. The etiology was predominantly vascular (50.8%), followed by traumatic (36.2%). At admission, prevalence of PSH was 31.3%, which decreased to 16.6% and 4.4% at T1 and T2, respectively. At T2, 2.8% were dead and 61.1% had a full recovery of consciousness, whereas 36.1% remained in VS or MCS. A support vector machine (SVM)-based ML approach provides the best model with 82% accuracy in predicting outcomes. Analysis of variable importance shows that the most important clinical factors influencing the outcome are the PSH-AM scores measured at T0 and T1, together with neurological diagnosis, CRS-r, and RLAS scores measured at T0. This joint multi-center effort provides a comprehensive picture of the clinical impact of PSH signs in ABI patients, demonstrating its predictive value in comparison with other well-known clinical measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acquired brain injury; disorders of consciousness; machine learning; outcome prediction; paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33371784     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  3 in total

Review 1.  Leveraging Continuous Vital Sign Measurements for Real-Time Assessment of Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction After Brain Injury: A Narrative Review of Current and Future Applications.

Authors:  Jamie Podell; Melissa Pergakis; Shiming Yang; Ryan Felix; Gunjan Parikh; Hegang Chen; Lujie Chen; Catriona Miller; Peter Hu; Neeraj Badjatia
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.532

2.  Predicting outcome of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness using machine learning models based on medical complexity.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Liuzzi; Alfonso Magliacano; Francesco De Bellis; Andrea Mannini; Anna Estraneo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Predicting Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury: Is Machine Learning the Best Way?

Authors:  Roberta Bruschetta; Gennaro Tartarisco; Lucia Francesca Lucca; Elio Leto; Maria Ursino; Paolo Tonin; Giovanni Pioggia; Antonio Cerasa
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.