Literature DB >> 33371661

Long-lasting pain relief with interfascial plane blocks: key role of opening interfascial adhesions.

Mürsel Ekinci1, Bahadir Ciftci1, Haci Ahmet Alici2, Ali Ahiskalioglu3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33371661      PMCID: PMC8648512          DOI: 10.4097/kja.20650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


× No keyword cloud information.
We read with great interest the correspondence by Piraccini and Byrne [1] in response to our report of a patient with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), who underwent rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) at our clinic [2]. We thank the authors for their valuable comments and opinions. Their article might show a new way for both diagnosis and treatment of MPS due to fascial adhesion. We would like to share the details of long-term pain relief in our patient as additional information. RIB is a novel interfascial block that has been used to treat MPS in recent times [2,3]. MPS is a chronic condition, and few cases might be refractory. MPS can be primary or secondary [1,2]. In secondary cases, such as in our patient, interfascial plane blocks might be a good alternative for treatment. However, it is not clear whether they provide short-term or long-term relief. To the best of our knowledge, previous case reports in the literature have described short-term pain relief on using fascial plane block for MPS [3-5]. Piraccini and Maitan [3] performed RIB in a female patient who had fascial adhesions and reported successful results; however, the long-term outcomes are unknown. Similarly, Piraccini et al. [4] performed an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for MPS, but the authors emphasize that ESPB provides short-term relief and that fascial plane blocks should be combined with physical therapy. In our case, we performed RIB using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 8 mg of dexamethasone [2]. The patient was followed up for four weeks. For the first two weeks, we prescribed 25 mg oral dexketoprofen and 8 mg of thiocolchicoside. After four weeks of observation, the patient underwent follow-up once a month. He is still under follow-up. He had no recurrence of MPS in the last 6 months, required no analgesic drugs, and did not undergo physical therapy. He continues his work and daily activities. Our patient might have had fascial adhesions but experienced long-term relief with fascial hydro-dissection and bupivacaine with 8 mg of dexamethasone. Chronic pain is complicated, and interfascial adhesions might play a key role in this complex process. We aimed to treat several steps associated with the pain mechanism by using multimodal analgesia management with hydro-dissection. The use of fascial plane blocks for MPS is a novel technique. There is a lack of information about long-term results in the literature. Further studies and larger case series are necessary to validate the results.
  5 in total

1.  Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block relieves lower cervical and interscapular myofascial pain, a new indication.

Authors:  Serkan Tulgar; David Terence Thomas; Husnu Suslu
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Erector spinae plane block for myofascial pain syndrome: only a short-term relief?

Authors:  Emanuele Piraccini; Morena Calli; Stefania Taddei; Helen Byrne; Marco Rocchi; Stefano Maitan
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Ultrasound guided rhomboid plane hydrodissection for fascial adhesion.

Authors:  Emanuele Piraccini; Stefano Maitan
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  The efficacy of fascial plane blocks for myofascial pain syndrome: do they achieve long-term results?

Authors:  Emanuele Piraccini; Helen Byrne
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block effectively manages myofascial pain.

Authors:  Mürsel Ekinci; Bahadir Ciftci; Haci Ahmet Alici; Ali Ahiskalioglu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Is the deep supraspinatus muscle plane block and suprascapular nerve block the same approach? A cadaveric nomenclature study.

Authors:  Basak Altiparmak; Bahadir Ciftci; Bahar Tekin; Bayram Ufuk Sakul; Haci Ahmet Alici
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-12-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.