Literature DB >> 33371585

Emerging Biorecognition and Transduction Schemes for Rapid Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria in Food.

Diana C Vanegas1, Carmen L Gomes2, Nicholas D Cavallaro3, Daniel Giraldo-Escobar1, Eric S McLamore3.   

Abstract

The presence of unsafe levels of microorganisms in food constitutes a growing economic and public health problem that necessitates new technology for their rapid detection along the food continuum from production to consumption. While traditional techniques are reliable, there is a need for more sensitive, selective, rapid, and cost-effective approaches for food safety evaluation. Methods such as microbiological counts are sufficiently accurate and inexpensive, and are capable of determining presence and viability for most pathogens. However, these techniques are time consuming, involve destructive sampling, and require trained personnel and biosafety-certified facilities for analysis. Molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction have greatly improved analytical capability over the last decade, achieving shorter analysis time with quantitative data and strain specificity, and in some cases the ability to discriminate cell viability. The emerging field of nanosensors/biosensors has demonstrated a variety of devices that hold promise to bridge the gap between traditional plate counting and molecular techniques. Many nanosensors/biosensors are rapid, portable, accurate devices that can be used as an additional screening tool for identifying unsafe levels of microorganisms in food products with no need for pre-enrichment. In this review, we provide a brief overview of available biorecognition-transduction techniques for detecting bacteria in food. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, and describe some recent biosensor or nanosensor technologies that are under development. We conclude by summarizing the opportunities and challenges in the field of pathogen monitoring in food systems and we focus the discussion on the strengths/weaknesses of the most popular biorecognition agents and transducer nanomaterials for biosensing.
© 2017 Institute of Food Technologists®.

Keywords:  biosensor; nanotechnology; pathogen; rapid monitoring; spoilage

Year:  2017        PMID: 33371585     DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf        ISSN: 1541-4337            Impact factor:   12.811


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of Salmonellosis: Current Prospective and Challenges.

Authors:  Subhasis Mahari; Sonu Gandhi
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 2.  Laser-Induced Graphene-Functionalized Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensing: A Potent Candidate for COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Deniz Sadighbayan; Aamir Minhas-Khan; Ebrahim Ghafar-Zadeh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.206

Review 3.  Microbial Biofilms in the Food Industry-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Conrado Carrascosa; Dele Raheem; Fernando Ramos; Ariana Saraiva; António Raposo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Recent Advances and Applications of Rapid Microbial Assessment from a Food Safety Perspective.

Authors:  George Pampoukis; Anastasia E Lytou; Anthoula A Argyri; Efstathios Z Panagou; George-John E Nychas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A sandwich-type bacteriophage-based amperometric biosensor for the detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups in complex matrices.

Authors:  Irwin A Quintela; Vivian C H Wu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  One-Step Fabrication of Stimuli-Responsive Chitosan-Platinum Brushes for Listeria monocytogenes Detection.

Authors:  Daniela A Oliveira; Suleiman Althawab; Eric S McLamore; Carmen L Gomes
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.