Literature DB >> 33371519

Understanding the Role of Pattern Geometry on Nanofiltration Threshold Flux.

Anna Malakian1, Zuo Zhou2, Lucas Messick1, Tara N Spitzer1, David A Ladner2, Scott M Husson1.   

Abstract

Colloidal fouling can be mitigated by membrane surface patterning. This contribution identifies the effect of different pattern geometries on fouling behavior. Nanoscale line-and-groove patterns with different feature sizes were applied by thermal embossing on commercial nanofiltration membranes. Threshold flux values of as-received, pressed, and patterned membranes were determined using constant flux, cross-flow filtration experiments. A previously derived combined intermediate pore blocking and cake filtration model was applied to the experimental data to determine threshold flux values. The threshold fluxes of all patterned membranes were higher than the as-received and pressed membranes. The pattern fraction ratio (PFR), defined as the quotient of line width and groove width, was used to analyze the relationship between threshold flux and pattern geometry quantitatively. Experimental work combined with computational fluid dynamics simulations showed that increasing the PFR leads to higher threshold flux. As the PFR increases, the percentage of vortex-forming area within the pattern grooves increases, and vortex-induced shielding increases. This study suggests that the PFR should be higher than 1 to produce patterned membranes with maximal threshold flux values. Knowledge generated in this study can be applied to other feature types to design patterned membranes for improved control over colloidal fouling.

Keywords:  colloidal fouling; membrane patterning; membrane surface modification; thin-film composite membranes; threshold flux

Year:  2020        PMID: 33371519      PMCID: PMC7767534          DOI: 10.3390/membranes10120445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  6 in total

1.  Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review.

Authors:  Chuyang Y Tang; T H Chong; Anthony G Fane
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 12.984

2.  Roughness and hydrophobicity studies of nanofiltration membranes using different modes of AFM.

Authors:  K Boussu; B Van der Bruggen; A Volodin; J Snauwaert; C Van Haesendonck; C Vandecasteele
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Stiffness, strength, and ductility of nanoscale thin films and membranes: a combined wrinkling-cracking methodology.

Authors:  Jun Young Chung; Jung-Hyun Lee; Kathryn L Beers; Christopher M Stafford
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Preparation and application of patterned membranes for wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Young-June Won; Jaewoo Lee; Dong-Chan Choi; Hee Ro Chae; Inae Kim; Chung-Hak Lee; In-Chul Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Microscale patterned surfaces reduce bacterial fouling-microscopic and theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Ravikumar Vasudevan; Alan J Kennedy; Megan Merritt; Fiona H Crocker; Ronald H Baney
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.268

6.  Influence of Surface Micro-Patterning and Hydrogel Coating on Colloidal Silica Fouling of Polyamide Thin-Film Composite Membranes.

Authors:  Ibrahim M A ElSherbiny; Ahmed S G Khalil; Mathias Ulbricht
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nanofiltration Membranes: Recent Advances and Environmental Applications.

Authors:  Mohammad Peydayesh
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.