| Literature DB >> 33371057 |
Liang Liu1,2, Chaojie Liu3, Xiong Ke4, Ningxiu Li2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Depression is one of the most common mental health problems in adolescents. The link between negative life events and depression has been well established. However, our understanding about the role of social support in the link, which is likely culture-dependent, is quite limited. This study aimed to determine the mediating effect of social support on the association between life events and depression in adolescents in Chongqing China.A total of 1512 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years old in Chongqing of China were selected using a stratified cluster sampling strategy. Depression symptoms, negative life events, and perceived social support of the participants were measured using the Children's Depression Inventory, Adolescent Life Event Scale, and Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale, respectively. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to detect their associations. A multivariate linear regression model was established to determine the association between life events and depression after adjustment for variations in socio-demographic variables. The mediating effect of social support on the association between negative life events and depression was tested using the structural equation model.About 16.8% of the participants were detected with depression. Depression was associated with negative life events and low levels of social support (P < .05). Both frequency and perceived importance of social support showed a mediating effect on the association between life events and depression.Social support has a mediating effect on the association between life events and depression. Strengthening social support may be considered as an effective interventional strategy on depression in adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33371057 PMCID: PMC7748167 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Correlations between depression symptoms, social support and life events.
| Pearson correlation coefficient | |||||
| Mean ± SD | Depression | Frequency of social support | Importance of social support | Life events | |
| Depression symptoms | 13.86 ± 7.20 | – | |||
| Frequency of social support | 197.02 ± 36.07 | −0.35∗ | – | ||
| Importance of social support | 125.77 ± 21.92 | −0.06∗∗ | 0.52∗∗ | – | |
| Life events | 37.35 ± 22.01 | 0.35∗∗ | −0.10∗∗ | −0.14∗∗ | – |
Factors associated with depression symptoms – findings from multivariate regression analysis.
| Δ | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 4.34 | |||
| Age (yr) | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.37 | |||
| Sex | −0.54 | −0.04 | −1.44 | |||
| Ethnicity | −1.94 | −0.10 | −3.57∗∗∗ | |||
| Urban residency | 0.80 | 0.05 | 1.94 | |||
| married status of parents | 0.77 | 0.04 | 1.52 | |||
| Having no sibling | 0.80 | 0.05 | 2.02∗ | |||
| Boarding school | −0.88 | −0.06 | −2.05∗ | |||
| Model 2 (adding life events variable to Model 1) | 0.15 | 0.14 | 32.18 | |||
| Age (yr) | 0.23 | 0.05 | 1.90 | |||
| Sex | −0.61 | −0.04 | −1.76 | |||
| Ethnicity | −2.89 | −0.15 | −5.66∗∗∗ | |||
| Urban residency | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.46 | |||
| married status of parents | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.56 | |||
| Having no sibling | 0.38 | 0.03 | 1.02 | |||
| Boarding school | −0.47 | −0.03 | −1.18 | |||
| Total score of life events | 0.12 | 0.37 | 14.92∗∗∗ | |||
| Model 3 (adding subscales of life events to model 1) | 0.21 | 0.20 | 29.77 | |||
| Age (yr) | 0.13 | 0.03 | 1.06 | |||
| Sex | −0.27 | −0.02 | −0.79 | |||
| Ethnicity | −3.09 | −0.17 | −5.91∗∗∗ | |||
| Urban residency | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.81 | |||
| married status of parents | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.69 | |||
| Having no sibling | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.51 | |||
| Boarding school | −0.42 | −0.03 | −1.09 | |||
| Interpersonal relationship | 0.39 | 0.28 | 8.95∗∗∗ | |||
| Study pressure | 0.27 | 0.16 | 4.93∗∗∗ | |||
| Punishment | −0.09 | −0.09 | −2.35∗ | |||
| Bereavement | −0.20 | −0.10 | −3.47∗∗ | |||
| Health and adaptation | 0.15 | 0.07 | 2.17∗ | |||
| Other life events | 0.36 | 0.15 | 4.82∗∗∗ |
Fitness of data into the structural equation model.
| Model fitness index | Before adjustment of residual error | After adjustment of residual error |
| CMIN/DF | 16.92 | 6.47 |
| GFI | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| AGFI | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| CFI | 0.86 | 0.96 |
| NFI | 0.85 | 0.95 |
| TLI | 0.82 | 0.94 |
| RMSEA | 0.10 | 0.06 |
Figure 1Structural equation model-mediating effect of social support on the association between negative life events and depression symptoms. The number on lines or arrows is standardized path coefficient. Arrows indicate the interaction between the variables. The symbol “∗∗∗”indicate P < .001.