| Literature DB >> 33370804 |
Shengjie Wu1,2, Parikshit S Sharma3, Weijian Huang1,2.
Abstract
It is well recognized that a high burden of right ventricular pacing results in deleterious clinical outcomes over the long term. His bundle pacing can achieve optimal ventricular synchronization; however, relatively high pacing thresholds, low R-wave amplitudes, and the long-term performance have been concerns. Recently, left ventricular (LV) septal endocardium pacing (LVSP) has demonstrated improved acute haemodynamics. Another novel technique of intraseptal left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) via transvenous approach has been adopted rapidly and has demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical application and differences between LVSP and LBBP. Compared with LVSP, LBBP has strict criteria for left conduction system capture and lead location. In addition to LV septal capture it also stimulates the proximal left bundle branch, resulting in rapid and physiological LV activation. With a uniformity and standardization of the implant procedure and definitions, it may be possible to achieve widespread application of this form of physiological pacing. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Keywords: Cardiac synchronization therapy; His bundle pacing; Left bundle branch pacing; Left ventricular septal pacing
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33370804 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214