Carson T Telford1,2, Cyndra Bystrom3, Teresa Fox3, David P Holland1,4, Sherry Wiggins-Benn5, Anjum Mandani1, Meshell McCloud5, Sarita Shah2,4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Fulton County Board of Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 5. Nursing Administration, Fulton County Board of Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for infection prevention and control (IPC) of COVID-19 in long-term care settings were developed based on limited understanding of COVID-19 and should be evaluated to determine their efficacy in reducing transmission among high-risk populations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Site visits to 24 long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Fulton County, Georgia, were conducted between June and July 2020 to assess adherence to current guidelines, provide real-time feedback on potential weaknesses, and identify specific indicators whose implementation or lack thereof was associated with higher or lower prevalence of COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four LTCFs were visited, representing 2,580 LTCF residents, among whom 1,004 (39%) were infected with COVID-19. MEASUREMENTS: Overall IPC adherence in LTCFs was analyzed for 33 key indicators across five categories: Hand Hygiene, Disinfection, Social Distancing, PPE, and Symptom Screening. Facilities were divided into Higher- and Lower-prevalence groups based on cumulative COVID-19 infection prevalence to determine differences in IPC implementation. RESULTS: IPC implementation was lowest in the Disinfection category (32%) and highest in the Symptom Screening category (74%). Significant differences in IPC implementation between the Higher- and Lower-prevalence groups were observed in the Social Distancing category (Higher-prevalence group 54% vs Lower-prevalence group 74%, P < .01) and the PPE category (Higher-prevalence group 41% vs Lower-prevalence group 72%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: LTCFs with lower COVID-19 prevalence among residents had significantly greater implementation of IPC recommendations compared to those with higher COVID-19 prevalence, suggesting the utility in adhering to current guidelines to reduce transmission in this vulnerable population.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for infection prevention and control (IPC) of COVID-19 in long-term care settings were developed based on limited understanding of COVID-19 and should be evaluated to determine their efficacy in reducing transmission among high-risk populations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Site visits to 24 long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Fulton County, Georgia, were conducted between June and July 2020 to assess adherence to current guidelines, provide real-time feedback on potential weaknesses, and identify specific indicators whose implementation or lack thereof was associated with higher or lower prevalence of COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four LTCFs were visited, representing 2,580 LTCF residents, among whom 1,004 (39%) were infected with COVID-19. MEASUREMENTS: Overall IPC adherence in LTCFs was analyzed for 33 key indicators across five categories: Hand Hygiene, Disinfection, Social Distancing, PPE, and Symptom Screening. Facilities were divided into Higher- and Lower-prevalence groups based on cumulative COVID-19infection prevalence to determine differences in IPC implementation. RESULTS: IPC implementation was lowest in the Disinfection category (32%) and highest in the Symptom Screening category (74%). Significant differences in IPC implementation between the Higher- and Lower-prevalence groups were observed in the Social Distancing category (Higher-prevalence group 54% vs Lower-prevalence group 74%, P < .01) and the PPE category (Higher-prevalence group 41% vs Lower-prevalence group 72%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: LTCFs with lower COVID-19 prevalence among residents had significantly greater implementation of IPC recommendations compared to those with higher COVID-19 prevalence, suggesting the utility in adhering to current guidelines to reduce transmission in this vulnerable population.
Authors: Patrick Alexander Wachholz; Ruth Caldeira de Melo; Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto; Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2022
Authors: Lisa S van Tol; Hanneke J A Smaling; Wendy Meester; Sarah I M Janus; Sytse U Zuidema; Margot W M de Waal; Monique A A Caljouw; Wilco P Achterberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jan M Stratil; Renke L Biallas; Jacob Burns; Laura Arnold; Karin Geffert; Angela M Kunzler; Ina Monsef; Julia Stadelmaier; Katharina Wabnitz; Tim Litwin; Clemens Kreutz; Anna Helen Boger; Saskia Lindner; Ben Verboom; Stephan Voss; Ani Movsisyan Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-15
Authors: Brajendra K Singh; Joseph Walker; Prabasaj Paul; Sujan Reddy; Camden D Gowler; John Jernigan; Rachel B Slayton Journal: Vaccine Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Adam H Dyer; Aoife Fallon; Claire Noonan; Helena Dolphin; Cliona O'Farrelly; Nollaig M Bourke; Desmond O'Neill; Sean P Kennelly Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 7.802