Subashini Jayawardana1, Carukshi Arambepola2, Thashi Chang3, Ariaranee Gnanathasan3. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The burden of snakebite remains poorly characterised because of the paucity of population-based data. Further, factors determining the vulnerability of individuals within rural communities to snakebite have been rarely investigated. We undertook a population-based study to determine the prevalence, vulnerability and epidemiological characteristics of snakebite in rural Sri Lanka. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 8707 current residents in the district of Ampara, representing typical rural Sri Lanka. The sample was recruited using multi-stage cluster sampling with probability proportionate-to-size. Snakebite victims were identified using the WHO criteria. Data were collected using a pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire. Each household had on average 3.8 persons; mean age 28.3 years (SD = 18.2); 51.3% males. The one-year point prevalence of snakebites was 17.6 per 1000 residents (95% CI: 15-20.6) and 6.12 per 100 households (95% CI: 5.25-7.13), while the lifetime prevalence was 9.4 per 100 residents (95% CI: 8.8-10.0) and 30.5 per 100 households (95% CI: 28.6-32.2) with a case fatality ratio of 0.033. Venomous snakebites accounted for 28.1%; snakes were unidentified among 30.1%. Compared to the non-snakebite victims, being single, males, of Sinhala ethnicity, aged >19 years, low education and socioeconomic status, engaging in farming or unskilled outdoor occupations denoted vulnerability to snakebites. Outdoor bites (77.8%) were more common among males; during daytime; mostly while walking; within the rural terrains and home gardens; on lower limbs; mostly by hump-nosed and Russell viper. Indoor bites were more common among females; during night-time; while sleeping and barefooted; on lower limbs; mostly by hump-nosed vipers, kraits and non-venomous snakes. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of snakebite is considerably high among rural populations. The concept of vulnerability can be useful in healthcare decision-making and resource allocation.
BACKGROUND: The burden of snakebite remains poorly characterised because of the paucity of population-based data. Further, factors determining the vulnerability of individuals within rural communities to snakebite have been rarely investigated. We undertook a population-based study to determine the prevalence, vulnerability and epidemiological characteristics of snakebite in rural Sri Lanka. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 8707 current residents in the district of Ampara, representing typical rural Sri Lanka. The sample was recruited using multi-stage cluster sampling with probability proportionate-to-size. Snakebite victims were identified using the WHO criteria. Data were collected using a pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire. Each household had on average 3.8 persons; mean age 28.3 years (SD = 18.2); 51.3% males. The one-year point prevalence of snakebites was 17.6 per 1000 residents (95% CI: 15-20.6) and 6.12 per 100 households (95% CI: 5.25-7.13), while the lifetime prevalence was 9.4 per 100 residents (95% CI: 8.8-10.0) and 30.5 per 100 households (95% CI: 28.6-32.2) with a case fatality ratio of 0.033. Venomous snakebites accounted for 28.1%; snakes were unidentified among 30.1%. Compared to the non-snakebite victims, being single, males, of Sinhala ethnicity, aged >19 years, low education and socioeconomic status, engaging in farming or unskilled outdoor occupations denoted vulnerability to snakebites. Outdoor bites (77.8%) were more common among males; during daytime; mostly while walking; within the rural terrains and home gardens; on lower limbs; mostly by hump-nosed and Russell viper. Indoor bites were more common among females; during night-time; while sleeping and barefooted; on lower limbs; mostly by hump-nosed vipers, kraits and non-venomous snakes. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of snakebite is considerably high among rural populations. The concept of vulnerability can be useful in healthcare decision-making and resource allocation.
Authors: C A Ariaratnam; V Thuraisingam; S A M Kularatne; M H R Sheriff; R D G Theakston; A de Silva; D A Warrell Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Maria Rita Bertolozzi; Camila Morato da Conceição Scatena; Francisco Oscar de Siqueira França Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Joshua Longbottom; Freya M Shearer; Maria Devine; Gabriel Alcoba; Francois Chappuis; Daniel J Weiss; Sarah E Ray; Nicolas Ray; David A Warrell; Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda; David J Williams; Simon I Hay; David M Pigott Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 202.731