Literature DB >> 33369678

Use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to monitor tocilizumab effect on vascular inflammation in giant cell arteritis.

Kaitlin A Quinn1, Himanshu Dashora1, Elaine Novakovich1, Mark A Ahlman2, Peter C Grayson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the time-dependent effects of tocilizumab on vascular inflammation as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in giant cell arteritis (GCA).
METHODS: Patients with GCA treated with tocilizumab were selected from a prospective, observational cohort. Patients underwent FDG-PET at the baseline visit prior to initiation of tocilizumab and at subsequent follow-up visits performed at 6-month intervals. All imaging findings were interpreted blinded to clinical data. The PET vascular activity score (PETVAS) was used to quantify arterial FDG uptake. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare change in PETVAS between visits. Linear regression was used to determine change in PETVAS over multiple timepoints.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with GCA were included. All patients had physician-determined active vasculitis at the baseline visit by clinical assessment and FDG-PET interpretation. PETVAS was significantly reduced in association with tocilizumab treatment from the baseline to the most recent follow-up visit [24.0 (IQR 22.3-27.0) vs 18.5 (IQR 15.3-23.8); p< 0.01]. A significant reduction in PETVAS was observed over a two-year treatment period (p< 0.01 for linear trend), with a similar degree of improvement in both the first and second years of treatment. Repeat FDG-PET scans after tocilizumab discontinuation showed worsening PET activity in five out of six patients, with two patients subsequently experiencing clinical relapse.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with GCA with tocilizumab was associated with both clinical improvement and reduction of vascular inflammation as measured by serial FDG-PET. Future clinical trials in GCA should study direct treatment effect on vascular inflammation as an outcome measure. Published by Oxford University Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  giant cell arteritis; large-vessel vasculitis; positron emission tomography; tocilizumab

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369678     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  6 in total

Review 1.  An Updated Review of Cardiovascular Events in Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Hubert de Boysson; Achille Aouba
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Need and value of targeted immunosuppressive therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Maria Sandovici; Niels van der Geest; Yannick van Sleen; Elisabeth Brouwer
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-02

Review 3.  Perspectives of JAK Inhibitors for Large Vessel Vasculitis.

Authors:  Ryu Watanabe; Motomu Hashimoto
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Aging-Related Vascular Inflammation: Giant Cell Arteritis and Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Ryu Watanabe; Motomu Hashimoto
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 5.  Pathogenic role of monocytes/macrophages in large vessel vasculitis.

Authors:  Ryu Watanabe; Motomu Hashimoto
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  The RECOVERY trial: cardiovascular implications of a large, simple randomized trial in COVID-19.

Authors:  Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim; Marion M Mafham
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 10.787

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.