Literature DB >> 33369585

CORR Insights®: What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Scott S Kelley1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33369585      PMCID: PMC7899439          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?

Authors:  Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Erin L Ruh; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  J Löchel; V Janz; C Hipfl; C Perka; G I Wassilew
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  Modular tapered titanium stems in revision arthroplasty of the hip: The Risk and Causes of Stem Fracture.

Authors:  S Konan; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.