Literature DB >> 33369241

Hidden heterogeneity and co-occurrence networks of soil prokaryotic communities revealed at the scale of individual soil aggregates.

Márton Szoboszlay1, Christoph C Tebbe1.   

Abstract

Sequencing PCR-amplified gene fragments from metagenomic DNA is a widely applied method for studying the diversity and dynamics of soil microbial communities. Typically, DNA is extracted from 0.25 to 1 g of soil. These amounts, however, neglect the heterogeneity of soil present at the scale of soil aggregates and thus ignore a crucial scale for understanding the structure and functionality of soil microbial communities. Here, we show with a nitrogen-depleted agricultural soil the impact of reducing the amount of soil used for DNA extraction from 250 mg to approx. 1 mg to access spatial information on the prokaryotic community structure, as indicated by 16S rRNA gene amplicon analyses. Furthermore, we demonstrate that individual aggregates from the same soil differ in their prokaryotic community compositions. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences from individual soil aggregates allowed us, in contrast to 250 mg soil samples, to construct a co-occurrence network that provides insight into the structure of microbial associations in the studied soil. Two dense clusters were apparent in the network, one dominated by Thaumarchaeota, known to be capable of ammonium oxidation at low N concentrations, and the other by Acidobacteria subgroup 6, representing an oligotrophic lifestyle to obtain energy from SOC. Overall this study demonstrates that DNA obtained from individual soil aggregates provides new insights into how microbial communities are assembled.
© 2020 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microhabitats; network analysis; soil DNA extraction; soil aggregates; soil microbial diversity; spatial scales

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369241      PMCID: PMC7884235          DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiologyopen        ISSN: 2045-8827            Impact factor:   3.904


  45 in total

1.  A soil microscale study to reveal the heterogeneity of Hg(II) impact on indigenous bacteria by quantification of adapted phenotypes and analysis of community DNA fingerprints.

Authors: 
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 2.  Microbial biogeography: from taxonomy to traits.

Authors:  Jessica L Green; Brendan J M Bohannan; Rachel J Whitaker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics.

Authors:  Nathalie Lombard; Emmanuel Prestat; Jan Dirk van Elsas; Pascal Simonet
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision.

Authors:  Sophie Weiss; Will Van Treuren; Catherine Lozupone; Karoline Faust; Jonathan Friedman; Ye Deng; Li Charlie Xia; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Luke Ursell; Eric J Alm; Amanda Birmingham; Jacob A Cram; Jed A Fuhrman; Jeroen Raes; Fengzhu Sun; Jizhong Zhou; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Christa Schleper; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples.

Authors:  Angela Glassing; Scot E Dowd; Susan Galandiuk; Brian Davis; Rodrick J Chiodini
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.181

8.  Soil aggregates as massively concurrent evolutionary incubators.

Authors:  Matthias C Rillig; Ludo Ah Muller; Anika Lehmann
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 9.  Microbiome Datasets Are Compositional: And This Is Not Optional.

Authors:  Gregory B Gloor; Jean M Macklaim; Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn; Juan J Egozcue
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Improved Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene (V4 and V4-5) and Fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer Marker Gene Primers for Microbial Community Surveys.

Authors:  William Walters; Embriette R Hyde; Donna Berg-Lyons; Gail Ackermann; Greg Humphrey; Alma Parada; Jack A Gilbert; Janet K Jansson; J Gregory Caporaso; Jed A Fuhrman; Amy Apprill; Rob Knight
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.496

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  From diversity to complexity: Microbial networks in soils.

Authors:  Ksenia Guseva; Sean Darcy; Eva Simon; Lauren V Alteio; Alicia Montesinos-Navarro; Christina Kaiser
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.546

2.  Microbial Identification, High-Resolution Microscopy and Spectrometry of the Rhizosphere in Its Native Spatial Context.

Authors:  Chaturanga D Bandara; Matthias Schmidt; Yalda Davoudpour; Hryhoriy Stryhanyuk; Hans H Richnow; Niculina Musat
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Reconciling concepts of black queen and tragedy of the commons in simulated bulk soil and rhizosphere prokaryote communities.

Authors:  Damien Robert Finn; Mario App; Lionel Hertzog; Christoph C Tebbe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.