Literature DB >> 33369209

Consecutive contralateral comparison of toric and non-toric implantable collamer lenses V4c in vault after implantation for myopia and astigmatism.

Jiao Zhao1, Jing Zhao2,3,4, Wen Yang5, Meiyan Li2,3,4, Gengsheng Hao1, Zhuoyi Chen2,3,4, Xiaoying Wang2,3,4, Peijun Yao2,3,4, Xingtao Zhou2,3,4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the vault performance between implantable collamer lens (ICL) V4c and Toric ICL (TICL) V4c after implantation and to investigate the affecting factors.
METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 patients with myopia or myopia astigmatism who underwent implantation of TICL in one eye (group A) and identically sized ICL (group B) in the contralateral eye were included. Mean follow-up time were 7.58 ± 1.63 months (range: 6-10 months). Vault was compared between the two groups and correlations between vault and age, preoperative ocular biometric measurements were analysed. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model of postoperative vault adjusting for within-patient intereye correlations was performed.
RESULTS: The safety indices were 1.27 and 1.35, and the efficacy indices were 1.20 and 1.24 for groups A and B, respectively. Vault of TICL was significantly higher than that of ICL (554.11 ± 219.36 μm vs 449.70 ± 172.47 μm, P < 0.001). The difference between ICL/TICL size and WTW (size-WTW) and STS (size-STS), anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter (PD) were positively correlated with vault. Patient age and clear lens rise measured by Pentacam were negatively correlated with vault. Results of GEE model showed preoperative PD, age, cylindrical power of TICL and size-WTW were influencing factors for postoperative vault.
CONCLUSIONS: Vault after TICL implantation is higher than that with ICL. PD, age, cylindrical power of TICL and size-WTW could affect postoperative vault.
© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vault; implantable collamer lens; myopia; pupil diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369209     DOI: 10.1111/aos.14720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  5 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Rui Gong; Xiaolan Zhang; Yingping Deng
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Clinical Prediction of Inadequate Vault in Eyes With Thick Lens After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation Using Iris Morphology.

Authors:  Zhikun Yang; Lihui Meng; Xinyu Zhao; Youxin Chen; Yan Luo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens.

Authors:  Elena Martínez-Plaza; Alberto López-Miguel; Alberto López-de la Rosa; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Peripheral Anterior Chamber Depth and Angle Measurements Using Pentacam After Implantation of Toric and Non-toric Implantable Collamer Lenses.

Authors:  Jiao Zhao; Jing Zhao; Wen Yang; Huamao Miao; Lingling Niu; Jianmin Shang; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-27

5.  Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes.

Authors:  Ruoyan Wei; Meiyan Li; Aruma Aruma; Michael C Knorz; Dong Yang; Yongfu Yu; Xiaoying Wang; Joanne Choi; Peijun Yao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.528

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.