Literature DB >> 33369041

Using patient-specific bolus for pencil beam scanning proton treatment of periorbital disease.

Minglei Kang1, Shaakir Hasan1, Robert H Press1, Francis Yu1, Mashal Abdo1, Weijun Xiong1, Jehee I Choi1, Charles B Simone1, Haibo Lin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A unique mantle cell lymphoma case with bilateral periorbital disease unresponsive to chemotherapy and with dosimetry not conducive to electron therapy was treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. This patient presented treatment planning challenges due to the thin target, immediately adjacent organs at risk (OAR), and nonconformal orbital surface anatomy. Therefore, we developed a patient-specific bolus and hypothesized that it would provide superior setup robustness, dose uniformity and dose conformity. MATERIALS/
METHODS: A blue-wax patient-specific bolus was generated from the patient's face contour to conform to his face and eliminate air gaps. A relative stopping power ratio (RSP) of 0.972 was measured for the blue-wax, and the HUs were overridden accordingly in the treatment planning system (TPS). Orthogonal kV images were used for bony alignment and then to ensure positioning of the bolus through fiducial markers attached to the bolus and their contours in TPS. Daily CBCT was used to confirm the position of the bolus in relation to the patient's surface. Dosimetric characteristics were compared between (a) nonbolus, (b) conventional gel bolus and (c) patient-specific bolus plans. An in-house developed workflow for assessment of daily treatment dose based on CBCT images was used to evaluate inter-fraction dose accumulation.
RESULTS: The patient was treated to 24 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) in 2 CGE daily fractions to the bilateral periorbital skin, constraining at least 50% of each lacrimal gland to under 20 Gy. The bolus increased proton beam range by adding 2-3 energy layers of different fields to help achieve better dose uniformity and adequate dose coverage. In contrast to the plan with conventional gel bolus, dose uniformity was significantly improved with patient-specific bolus. The global maximum dose was reduced by 7% (from 116% to 109%). The max and mean doses were reduced by 6.0% and 7.7%, respectively, for bilateral retinas, and 3.0% and 13.9% for bilateral lacrimal glands. The max dose of the lens was reduced by 2.1%. The rigid shape, along with lightweight, and smooth fit to the patient face was well tolerated and reported as "very comfortable" by the patient. The daily position accuracy of the bolus was within 1 mm based on IGRT marker alignment. The daily dose accumulation indicates that the target coverage and OAR doses were highly consistent with the planning intention.
CONCLUSION: Our patient-specific blue-wax bolus significantly increased dose uniformity, reduced OAR doses, and maintained consistent setup accuracy compared to conventional bolus. Quality PBS proton treatment for periorbital tumors and similar challenging thin and shallow targets can be achieved using such patient-specific bolus with robustness on both setup and dosimetry.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bolus; lymphoma; pencil beam scanning; periorbital disease; proton therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369041      PMCID: PMC7856513          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  22 in total

1.  Proton radiation therapy for primary sphenoid sinus malignancies: treatment outcome and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Minh Tam Truong; Urmila R Kamat; Norbert J Liebsch; William T Curry; Derrick T Lin; Fred G Barker; Jay S Loeffler; Annie W Chan
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Proton vs Photon Therapy as Part of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Brian C Baumann; Nandita Mitra; Joanna G Harton; Ying Xiao; Andrzej P Wojcieszynski; Peter E Gabriel; Haoyu Zhong; Huaizhi Geng; Abigail Doucette; Jenny Wei; Peter J O'Dwyer; Justin E Bekelman; James M Metz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 3.  Particle therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhongxing Liao; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

4.  Long-term outcome of proton therapy and carbon-ion therapy for large (T2a-T2bN0M0) non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Iwata; Yusuke Demizu; Osamu Fujii; Kazuki Terashima; Masayuki Mima; Yasue Niwa; Naoki Hashimoto; Takashi Akagi; Ryohei Sasaki; Yoshio Hishikawa; Mitsuyuki Abe; Yuta Shibamoto; Masao Murakami; Nobukazu Fuwa
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Steven H Lin; Charles B Simone; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08

Review 6.  Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Charles B Simone; Mark V Mishra
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Effects on Periocular Tissues after Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Intraocular Tumors.

Authors:  Youn Joo Choi; Tae Wan Kim; Suzy Kim; Hokyung Choung; Min Joung Lee; Namju Kim; Sang In Khwarg; Young Suk Yu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Practical considerations in the calibration of CT scanners for proton therapy.

Authors:  Christopher G Ainsley; Caitlyn M Yeager
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A L Vyfhuis; Nasarachi Onyeuku; Tejan Diwanji; Sina Mossahebi; Neha P Amin; Shahed N Badiyan; Pranshu Mohindra; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

10.  Dosimetric Comparison of Proton Radiation Therapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Based on Intracranial Tumor Location.

Authors:  Sebastian Adeberg; Semi B Harrabi; Nina Bougatf; Vivek Verma; Paul Windisch; Denise Bernhardt; Stephanie E Combs; Klaus Herfarth; Juergen Debus; Stefan Rieken
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treatment of ocular tumors through a novel applicator on a conventional proton pencil beam scanning beamline.

Authors:  Rajesh Regmi; Dominic Maes; Alexander Nevitt; Allison Toltz; Erick Leuro; Jonathan Chen; Lia Halasz; Ramesh Rengan; Charles Bloch; Jatinder Saini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Dose rate and dose robustness for proton transmission FLASH-RT treatment in lung cancer.

Authors:  Shouyi Wei; Haibo Lin; Sheng Huang; Chengyu Shi; Weijun Xiong; Huifang Zhai; Lei Hu; Gang Yu; Robert H Press; Shaakir Hasan; Arpit M Chhabra; J Isabelle Choi; Charles B Simone; Minglei Kang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Applications of various range shifters for proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy.

Authors:  Haibo Lin; Chengyu Shi; Sheng Huang; Jiajian Shen; Minglei Kang; Qing Chen; Huifang Zhai; James McDonough; Zelig Tochner; Curtiland Deville; Charles B Simone; Stefan Both
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.