Literature DB >> 33368953

Uncovering patterns of freshwater positive interactions using meta-analysis: Identifying the roles of common participants, invasive species and environmental context.

Lindsey K Albertson1, Michael J MacDonald1, Benjamin B Tumolo1, Michelle A Briggs1, Zachary Maguire1, Sierra Quinn1, Jose A Sanchez-Ruiz1, Jaris Veneros1, Laura A Burkle1.   

Abstract

Positive interactions are sensitive to human activities, necessitating synthetic approaches to elucidate broad patterns and predict future changes if these interactions are altered or lost. General understanding of freshwater positive interactions has been far outpaced by knowledge of these important relationships in terrestrial and marine ecosystems. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the magnitude of positive interactions across freshwater habitats. In 340 studies, we found substantial positive effects, with facilitators increasing beneficiaries by, on average, 81% across all taxa and response variables. Mollusks in particular were commonly studied as both facilitators and beneficiaries. Amphibians were one group benefiting the most from positive interactions, yet few studies investigated amphibians. Invasive facilitators had stronger positive effects on beneficiaries than non-invasive facilitators. We compared positive effects between high- and low-stress conditions and found no difference in the magnitude of benefit in the subset of studies that manipulated stressors. Future areas of research include understudied facilitators and beneficiaries, the stress gradient hypothesis, patterns across space or time and the influence of declining taxa whose elimination would jeopardise fragile positive interaction networks. Freshwater positive interactions occur among a wide range of taxa, influence populations, communities and ecosystem processes and deserve further exploration.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem engineering; facilitation; habitat modification; mutualism; resource subsidy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33368953     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  2 in total

Review 1.  Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: Including the costs but not the benefits.

Authors:  Demetrio Boltovskoy; Radu Guiaşu; Lyubov Burlakova; Alexander Karatayev; Martin A Schlaepfer; Nancy Correa
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.943

2.  Identifying potential drivers of distribution patterns of invasive Corbicula fluminea relative to native freshwater mussels (Unionidae) across spatial scales.

Authors:  Taylor E Kelley; Garrett W Hopper; Irene Sánchez González; Jamie R Bucholz; Carla L Atkinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.