Literature DB >> 33368439

Real-world prevalence and consequences of potential drug-drug interactions in the first-wave COVID-19 treatments.

Noemí Martínez-López-de-Castro1, Marisol Samartín-Ucha1, Adolfo Paradela-Carreiro2, Antonio Pérez-Landeiro2, María Teresa Inaraja-Bobo2, Miriam Álvarez-Payero1, Inés Castro-Núñez2, Nerea García-Beloso2, David Robles-Torres2, Aida López-López2, Sonia González-Costas2, Belén Leboreiro-Enríquez2, Luis Otero-Millán2, Elena Yaiza Romero-Ventosa3, Cristina Casanova-Martínez2, Karina Lorenzo-Lorenzo2, Ana María Regueira-Arcay2, Cristina Vázquez-López2, Cristina Martínez-Reglero4, Guadalupe Piñeiro-Corrales2.   

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND
OBJECTIVE: Initial treatment recommendations of COVID-19 were based on the use of antimicrobial drugs and immunomodulators. Although information on drug interactions was available for other pathologies, there was little evidence in the treatment of COVID-19. The objective of this study was to analyse the potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) derived from the medication used in COVID-19 patients in the first pandemic wave and to evaluate the real consequences of such interactions in clinical practice.
METHODS: Cohort, retrospective and single-centre study carried out in a third-level hospital. Adult patients, admitted with suspected COVID-19, that received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon beta 1-b or tocilizumab and with any pDDIs according to "Liverpool Drug Interaction Group" between March and May 2020 were included. The possible consequences of pDDIs at the QTc interval level or any other adverse event according to the patient's medical record were analysed. A descriptive analysis was carried out to assess possible factors that may affect the QTc interval prolongation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Two hundred and eighteen (62.3%) patients of a total of 350 patients admitted with COVID-19 had at least one pDDI. There were 598 pDDIs. Thirty-eight pDDIs (6.3%) were categorized as not recommended or contraindicated. The mean value difference between baseline and pDDI posterior ECG was 412.3 ms ± 25.8 ms vs. 426.3 ms ± 26.7 ms; p < 0.001. Seven patients (5.7%) had a clinically significant alteration of QTc. A total of 44 non-cardiological events (7.3%) with a possible connection to a pDDI were detected. WHAT IS NEW AND
CONCLUSION: The number of pDDIs in patients admitted for COVID-19 in the first pandemic wave was remarkably high. However, clinical consequences occurred in a low percentage of patients. Interactions involving medications that would be contraindicated for concomitant administration are rare. Knowledge of these pDDIs and their consequences could help to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies in patients with COVID-19 or other diseases with these treatments.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33368439     DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  3 in total

1.  Identification of Drug Interaction Adverse Events in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valeria Conti; Carmine Sellitto; Martina Torsiello; Valentina Manzo; Emanuela De Bellis; Berenice Stefanelli; Nicola Bertini; Maria Costantino; Chiara Maci; Emanuel Raschi; Francesco Sabbatino; Graziamaria Corbi; Pasquale Pagliano; Amelia Filippelli
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Drug-drug interactions between treatment specific pharmacotherapy and concomitant medication in patients with COVID-19 in the first wave in Spain.

Authors:  M D Cantudo-Cuenca; Antonio Gutiérrez-Pizarraya; Ana Pinilla-Fernández; Enrique Contreras-Macías; M Fernández-Fuertes; F A Lao-Domínguez; Pilar Rincón; Juan Antonio Pineda; Juan Macías; Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline.

Authors:  James D Chalmers; Megan L Crichton; Pieter C Goeminne; Bin Cao; Marc Humbert; Michal Shteinberg; Katerina M Antoniou; Charlotte Suppli Ulrik; Helen Parks; Chen Wang; Thomas Vandendriessche; Jieming Qu; Daiana Stolz; Christopher Brightling; Tobias Welte; Stefano Aliberti; Anita K Simonds; Thomy Tonia; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 33.795

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.