| Literature DB >> 33368054 |
Rais Reskiawan A Kadir1, Mansour Alwjwaj1, Ulvi Bayraktutan2.
Abstract
Stroke continues to be the third-leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The limited availability of diagnostic tools approved therapeutics and biomarkers that help monitor disease progression or predict future events remain as the major challenges in the field of stroke medicine. Hence, attempts to discover safe and efficacious therapeutics and reliable biomarkers are of paramount importance. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs that play important roles in regulating gene expression. Since miRNAs also play important roles in key mechanisms associated with the pathogenesis of stroke, including energy failure, inflammation and cell death, it is possible that miRNAs may serve as reliable blood-based markers for risk prediction, diagnosis and prognosis of ischaemic stroke. Discovery of better neurological outcome and smaller cerebral infarcts in animal models of ischaemic stroke treated with miRNA agomirs or antagomirs indicate that miRNAs may also play a cerebrovascular protective role after an ischaemic stroke. Nonetheless, further evidences on the optimum time for treatment and route of administration are required before effective translation of these findings into clinical practice. Bearing these in mind, this paper reviews the current literature discussing the involvement of miRNAs in major pathologies associated with ischaemic stroke and evaluates their value as reliable biomarkers and therapeutics for ischaemic stroke.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Diagnostic marker; Prognostic marker; Stroke; Therapy; microRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33368054 PMCID: PMC9142420 DOI: 10.1007/s10571-020-01028-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Neurobiol ISSN: 0272-4340 Impact factor: 4.231
Fig. 1The involvement of key miRNAs and their targets in major mechanisms associated with ischaemic stroke. Abbreviations: AIF apoptosis-inducing factor; AMPAR α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor; APAF-1 apoptotic protease-activating factor-1; AQP-1 aquaporin-1; AQP4 aquaporin-4; Bcl-2 B-cell lymphoma-2; Bcl-xL B-cell lymphoma-extra large; Ca calcium ions; CAD caspase-activated Dnase; DISC death-inducing signalling complex; FADD Fas-associated protein with death domain; FasL Fas ligand; FasR Fas receptor; Fe ferrous ion; Glur-2 glutamate receptor-2; GPx glutathione peroxidase; GSH glutathione; HO hydrogen peroxide; ICAD inhibitor of caspase-activated Dnase; ICAM-1 intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IL-10 interleukin-10; IL-6 interleukin-6; MCP-1 monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; miRNA microRNA; NMDAR N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; NO nitric oxide; NOS nitric oxide synthase; Nox nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; Nrf-2 nuclear factor erythroid-2; O oxygen; O superoxide anion; OH− hydroxyl radical; ONOO peroxynitrite; PARP poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase; PKC protein kinase C; SDF-1 stromal cell-derived factor-1; SMAC second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase; SOD superoxide dismutase; TNF tumour necrosis factor; TRAIL TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; TRAIL-R TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor; VCAM-1 vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; XIAP X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein, ZO-1 zonula occludens-1
Observational studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic role of miRNAs in patients with ischaemic stroke
| Study design | Key findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author (year) | Diagnostic marker | Prognostic marker | |
| Zeng et al. ( | Case–control study | miR-210—an independent predictor of AIS, with AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.65, 88.3% and 41.1% | miR-210—an independent predictor for poor outcome (mRS > 2), with AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.64, 83.7% and 50.7% |
| No correlation between miR-210 level and stroke subtypes based on TOAST classification | |||
| Sample source: whole blood | |||
| Methodology: RT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: days 3, 7 and 14 after symptom onset | |||
| Long et al. ( | Cross-sectional study | miR-30a–AUC: 0.91–0.93; sensitivity: 90–94%; specificity: 80–84% | Not evaluated |
| miR-126–AUC: 0.92–0.94; sensitivity: 90–92%; specificity: 82–86% | |||
| Sample source: plasma | miR-let-7b–AUC: 0.91–0.93; sensitivity: 80–84%; specificity: 82–86% | ||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: 24 h–48 weeks after symptom onset | |||
| Leung et al. ( | Case–control study | Plasma miR-124-3p levels significantly increased in HS patients in comparison to AIS patients in cases presented ≤ 6 h after stroke onset. In contrast, the level of miR-16 was markedly higher in HS patients only in cases presented at 6–24 h after onset | Plasma concentrations of miR-124-3p correlated positively with lesion volume of HS patients |
| To discriminate HS and AIS: | Plasma levels of miR-124-3p and miR-16 were not associated with lesion volume in AIS patients | ||
| Sample source: plasma | miR-124-3p–AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.7, 68.4% and 71.2% | ||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | miR-16–AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.66, 94.7% and 35.1% | ||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| Wu et al. ( | Case–control study | The combination of miR-15a, miR-16 and miR-17-5p level was independent predictor of AIS with AUC value of 0.845. Sensitivity and specificity were not provided | There was a significant association between miR-16 levels and HDL and ApoA1 expression |
| No correlation between miR-17-5p and any clinical characteristic | |||
| Sample source: serum | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: not provided | |||
| Kim et al. ( | Cross-sectional study | miR-17 plasma level was an independent predictor of AIS, with AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.642, 37.4% and 89.2% | The level of miR-17 was not correlated with infarct volume and stroke severity, but was associated with future stroke recurrence |
| Sample source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 7 days after symptom onset | |||
| Tian et al. ( | Case–control study | The level of miR-16 was an independent predictor of AIS with AUC value of 0.775, sensitivity 69.7% and specificity 87% | MiR-16 expression was significantly higher in the poor prognosis (mRS 3–6) group than in the good prognosis (mRS 0–2) group |
| miR-16 AUC value, sensitivity and specificity in AIS patients reached 0.95, 100% and 91.3% in stroke derived from large artery atherosclerosis | |||
| Sample source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: microarray and qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 6 h after symptom onset | |||
| Huang et al. ( | Case–control study | Higher levels of miR-let-7e-5p were associated with increased risk of AIS (adjusted OR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.61–2.21, | The level of miR-let-7e-5p correlated with platelet dysfunction |
| The addition of miR-let-7e-5p to stroke traditional risk factor increased AUC value from 0.74 to 0.82. Sensitivity and specificity were not available | |||
| Sample source: whole blood | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: > 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| Tiedt et al. ( | Case–control study | The combination of miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-143-3p level was an independent predictor of AIS with AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.90, 85.6% and 75.6% | There was no correlation between infarct volumes and levels of miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p and miR-143-3p |
| Discovery stage: | To differentiate AIS patients with TIA patients, this combinational miRNA displayed AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.66, 89.2% and 27.1% | ||
| Validation stage: | |||
| Replication: | |||
| Sample source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| Wang et al. ( | Case–control study | The level of miR-221-3p and miR-382-5p were an independent predictor of AIS, with AUC values of 0.810 and 0.748, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were not available | The level of miR-221-3p and miR-382-5p were not associated with NIHSS score and with abnormalities in laboratory findings. However, miR-4271 were positively correlated with level of blood glucose |
| Sample source: serum | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 6 h after symptom onset | |||
| Chen et al. ( | Case–control study | The level of miR-146b was an independent predictor of AIS, with AUC value of 0.776. Sensitivity and specificity were not available | Increased level of miR-146b positively correlated with infarct volume and NIHSS score on admission |
| miR-146b level was associated with hs-CRP and IL-6 level | |||
| Sample source: serum | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| He et al. ( | Prospective cohort study | Not evaluated | The increased levels of miR-125b-5p and miR-206 were associated with higher NIHSS scores and greater infarct volume |
| miR-125b-5p levels were an independent predictive marker for unfavourable outcome (mRS > 2) after thrombolysis, with AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of 0.735, 86.36% and 55.36% | |||
| Source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: RT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| Zheng et al. ( | Case–control study | Not evaluated | The increased levels of miR-21-5p, miR-206 and miR-3123 were associated with the risk of haemorrhagic transformation in patients with cardioembolic stroke with AUC value of 0.67, 0.68 and 0.66, respectively |
| Sample source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: qRT-PCR | |||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
| Kalani et al. ( | Cohort study | 25 extracellular miRNAs have been identified to be significantly altered following stroke injury and were able to discriminate between ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke with AUC value of 0.813 | Not evaluated |
| Sample source: plasma | |||
| Methodology: RNA sequencing | |||
| Blood collection time: < 24 h after symptom onset | |||
AIS acute ischaemic stroke, ApoA1 apolipoprotein A1, AUC area under receiver-operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval, HCs healthy controls, HDL high-density lipoprotein, HS haemorrhagic stroke, hs-CRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin-6, IPH intraparenchymal haemorrhage, miRNA microRNA, mRS modified rankin scale, N number of participants, NIHSS national institutes of health stroke scale, OR odds ratio, qRT-PCR real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA ribonucleic acid, SAH subarachnoid haemorrhage, TIA transient ischaemic attack, TOAST trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment
Animal studies investigating the therapeutic efficacy of miRNA in the setting of ischaemic stroke
| Agent (Author) | Design | Key findings |
|---|---|---|
| miR-27b antagomir | Model: MCAO mice | Increased neuronal survival and promoted neurogenesis by directly regulating AMPK expression |
| (Wang et al. | Delivery strategy: NA | Improved functional outcome and spatial memory |
| Route: intravenous | ||
| Time of administration: day 7, 14 and 28 after MCAO | ||
| miR-107 antagomir | Model: MCAO rats | Suppressed VEGF mRNA and protein expression and promoted angiogenesis through directly binding to Dicer-1 |
| (Li et al.) | Delivery strategy: NA | Reduced infarct volume and improved capillaries in ischaemic boundary zone |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 1 h after MCAO | ||
| miR-126 agomir | Model: MCAO mice | Promoted vascular remodelling and neurogenesis |
| (Qu et al.) | Delivery strategy: lentiviral vector | Improved neurobehavioral recovery and reduced brain atrophy volume |
| Route: intracerebral | ||
| Time of administration: 7 days after MCAO | ||
| miR-126-Primed EPCs | Model: MCAO mice | Increased proliferation, migration and tubulogenic capacity of EPCs |
| (Pan et al.) | Delivery strategy: lentiviral vector | Decreased ROS and increased NO production of EPCs by activating PI3K/Akt/eNOS pathway |
| Route: intravenous | miR-126 augmented the therapeutic efficacy of EPCs and helped attenuate infarct volume and neurological deficits while improving cerebral blood flow, microvascular density and angiogenesis | |
| Time of administration: 2 h after MCAO | ||
| miR-126-3p or -5p agomir | Model: MCAO mouse | Reduced cerebral infarct and oedema volumes |
| (Pan et al.) | Delivery strategy: lentiviral vector | Improved zonula occludens-1 and occlusion expressions and maintained BBB function |
| Route: stereotactic injection | Reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β and TNF) and adhesion molecule (VCAM-1 and E-selectin) expressions | |
| Time of administration: 2 weeks before MCAO | ||
| miR-132 agomir | Model: MCAO mice | Suppressed MMP-9 expression and maintained tight junction VE-cadherin and β-catenin levels |
| (Zuo et al. | Route: intraventricular | Reduced infarct and oedema volumes, as well as neurological deficits |
| Delivery strategy: NA | ||
| Time of administration: 2 h before MCAO | ||
| miR-155 antagomir | Model: distal MCAO mouse | Improved blood flow and microvascular integrity and reduced neuronal damages in the peri-infarct area |
| (Caballero-Garrido et al.) | Delivery strategy: novel locked nucleic acid technology | Reduced infarct size and neurological impairments |
| Route: intravenous | Maintained the integrity of tight junctions through improved zonula occluden 1 protein | |
| Time of administration: 48 h after MCAO | Prevented post-ischaemic inflammation by decreasing cytokine and chemokine gene expressions | |
| miR-195 agomir | Model: MCAO rats | Decreased inflammatory response and neuronal cell death via direct suppression of NF-κB and Sema3A/Cdc42/JNK signalling pathways |
| (Cheng et al.) | Delivery strategy: lentiviral vector | Stimulated proliferation and mobilisation of neural stem cells toward infarct area |
| Route: intravenous | Improved neurological function and reduced infarct size | |
| Time of administration: 6 h after MCAO | ||
| miR-195 agomir | Model: MCAO rats | Reduced neuronal cell death by downregulating KLF-5 and JNK expressions |
| (Chang et al. | Delivery strategy: rAAV2/EGFP vector | Decreased infarct volume and neurological deficits |
| Route: Intravenous | Promoted neuronal growth, axonal regeneration and synaptic remodelling | |
| Time of administration: Not available | ||
| miR-200c antagomir | Model: MCAO mice | Increased neuronal survival rates through directly binding to Reelin |
| (Stary et al.) | Delivery strategy: NA | Reduced infarct volume and neurological deficits |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 24 h before MCAO | ||
| miR-214 agomir | Model: MCAO mice | Inhibited neuronal cell death by directly binding to Bax protein |
| (Ping et al.) | Delivery strategy: NA | Improved neurological outcomes and reduced infarct volume |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 48 h before MCAO | ||
| miR-216a agomir | Model: MCAO mice | Downregulated pro-inflammatory mediators, e.g. iNOS, MMP-9, TNF and IL-1β by directly targeting JAK2/STAT signalling pathway |
| (Tian et al.) | Delivery strategy: NA | Improved functional outcomes and reduced infarct volume |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 10 min after MCAO | ||
| miR-365 antagomir | Model: MCAO rats | miR-365 targets Pax6, a transcription factor account for conversion of astrocytes to neurons |
| (Mo et al. | Delivery strategy: NA | Promoted neurogenesis by inducing new mature neuron generation derived from astrocytes in the ischemic striatum |
| Route: intraventricular | Reduced neurological deficits and infarct outcome | |
| Time of administration: 30 min after MCAO | ||
| miR-384-5p agomir | Model: MCAO mouse | Promoted proliferation and angiogenesis of EPCs by regulating Notch signalling pathway |
| (Fan et al. | Delivery strategy: NA | Decreased infarct size and neuronal cell death |
| Route: Intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 2 days before MCAO | ||
| miR-1906 agomir | Model: MCAO mice | Reduced post-stroke inflammatory response by directly targeting TLR-4 |
| (Xu et al. | Delivery strategy: NA | Decreased neurological deficits and infarct volume |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: not provided | ||
| miR-3473b antagomir | Model: MCAO mouse | Prevented neuroinflammation by downregulating mRNA and protein expression of pro-inflammatory mediators like iNOS, COX-2, TNF and IL-6 |
| (Wang et al. | Delivery strategy: NA | Reduced infarct volume and improved neurobehavioural recovery |
| Route: intraventricular | ||
| Time of administration: 3 days prior to MCAO |
AMPK 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, Cdc42 cell division control protein 42, COX-2 cyclooxygenase-2, eNOS endothelial nitric oxide synthase, EPCs endothelial progenitor cells, IL-1β interleukin-1β, IL-6 interleuikin-6, iNOS inducible nitric oxide synthase, JAK janus kinase, JNK c-Jun N-terminal kinase, KLF-5 kruppel-like factor, MCAO middle cerebral artery occlusion, miRNA microRNA, MMP-9 matrix metallopeptidase-9, mRNA messenger ribonucleic acid, NA not applicable, NF-κB nuclear factor-κB, NO nitric oxide, Pax6 paired box protein-6, PI3K phosphoinositide 3-kinases, rAAV2/EGFP recombinant adeno-associated virus vector/E-green fluorescent protein, ROS reactive oxygen species, Sema3A semaphorin 3A, STAT signal transducer and activator of transcription, TLR-4 toll-like receptor-4, TNF tumour necrosis factor, VCAM-1 vascular cell adhesion protein-1, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor