Literature DB >> 33367458

Effects of Comorbidities on the Elderly Patients with COVID-19: Clinical Characteristics of Elderly Patients Infected with COVID-19 from Sichuan, China.

S-P Dai1, X Zhao, J-H Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The co-occurrence of chronic diseases in the elderly is a common problem. However, the relationship between comorbidities and the prognosis of elderly patients with COVID-19 was not clear. This study was supposed to describe the clinical characteristics of elderly patients with COVID-19 infection from Sichuan province and the effects of comorbidity.
DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19 patients from Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu between December 16, 2019 and February 26, 2020 were included in this study. Patients were divided into elderly group (≥60 years old) and non-elderly group (< 60 years old).
RESULTS: Elderly patients with COVID-19 indicated relatively higher proportion of comorbidities, and the most common were atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (56.5%), hypertension (43.5%) and chronic pulmonary disease (21.7%). The proportion of severe cases was higher in elderly group than that in non-elderly group (73.9% and 42.2%, respectively, P=0.012). During hospitalization, elderly patients indicated relatively higher proportion of complications, such as shock (21.7%), respiratory failure (21.7%). The proportion of patients with a decreased number of CD8+ lymphocytes (82.6%) and B lymphocytes (77.8%) in elderly patients was significantly higher than that in non-elderly group (48.9% and 44.8%, respectively). All 3 deaths were elderly patients with comorbidities and the cell counts of T lymphocyte subsets, B and NK cells of them were significantly decreased at admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with COVID-19 had a high proportion of severe cases and comorbidities, more likely to show low immune function, and indicate higher proportion of complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Sichuan Province; clinical characteristics; comorbidities; elderly

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33367458      PMCID: PMC7548532          DOI: 10.1007/s12603-020-1486-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


Introduction

In December 2019, pneumonia of unknown cause broke out in Wuhan, China (1). The pathogen has been identified and was named as «COVID-19» in February 11, 2020 (2). Older populations are more susceptible to variety of diseases compared to younger, including COVID-19 infection (3, 4). Although the entire population is susceptible to the COVID-19, older patients had higher morbidity and case-fatality rate (5). The mortality rate (4.5%) of the people over 60 years old was much higher than that of the people under 60 years old (1.4%) (6). The co-occurrence of chronic diseases in the elderly is a common problem in the field of global public health (7). It was reported that more than half of the elderly in developed countries had more than three chronic diseases, meaning an individual suffers from two or more diseases with different pathology and no mutual dependence at the same time (8, 9). Studies in China such as Beijing and Shanghai suggest that more than 70 percent of elderly people in the community have two or more chronic diseases (10, 11). Compared with patients with a single disease, the hospitalization rate and fatality rate of patients with comorbidities are higher, and the clinical prognosis is significantly poor. However, the relationship of comorbidities and the prognosis of elderly patients with COVID-19 was not clear. Therefore, this study intended to describe the clinical characteristics of elderly patients with COVID-19 infection and the effects of comorbidity by comparing with non-elderly patients.

Methods

Participants

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients COVID-19 who were hospitalized at Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu, from December 16, 2019 to February 26, 2020. All confirmed cases were diagnosed as having 2019-nCoV pneumonia according to WHO interim guidance (12). Mild cases were defined as confirmed cases with fever, respiratory symptoms and radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Severe cases were defined as mild cases with one of the following conditions: (1) respiratory rate ≥ 30 times/min; (2) oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in resting state; (3) arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/oxygen concentration (FiO2) ≤300mmHg; (4) respiratory failure occurs and mechanical ventilation is required; (5) shock occurs; (6) other organ failure occurs and intensive care unit is required. Our study was approved by the ethics committee of West China hospital (No.2020/430) and the written informed consent was waived.

Materials

The data on demographic, epidemiological, clinical, imaging and laboratory results, outcomes of patients included in this study were collected. All patients were categorized into two groups according to the age, the elderly group (≥60 years old) and the non-elderly group (< 60 years old). All collected data were compared between the two groups.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the software SPSS version 20.0. Continuous measurements were represented as mean (−x ±s) and analyzed by t-test or median (P25 and P75) and analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. χ2 test were used to analyze the classified variables. P value < 0.05 was considered to define statistical significance.

Results

The clinical and laboratory characteristics of elderly patients

68 patients who confirmed with COVID-19 infection were included in this study, aged from 19 to 88 years, and 35 (51.1%) male patients. Of the 68 patients, 45 (66.18%) and 23 (33.82%) were categorized into non-elderly group and elderly group, as shown in Table 1. In total, 62 (91.18%) patients had contact history. The most common symptoms in both groups were fever and cough.
Table 1

Baseline and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients

CharacteristicsNon-elderly patientsElderly patientsP value
Age, years41 (31.5–49)73 (64–81)
Sex0.201
Men26 (57.8%)9 (39.1%)
Women19 (42.2%)14 (60.9%)
History of contact43 (95.6%)19 (82.6%)0.169
Comorbidities23 (51.1%)19 (82.6%)0.017
Hypertension4 (8.9%)10 (43.5%)0.003
Diabetes5 (11.1%)6 (26.1%)0.464
Cardiovascular disease9 (20.0%)13 (56.5%)0.005
Chronic pulmonary disease0 (0.0%)5 (21.7%)0.003
Liver disease6 (13.3%)1 (4.3%)0.409
Chronic kidney disease1 (2.2%)3 (13.0%)0.109
Signs and symptoms
Fever38 (84.4%)18 (78.3%)0.522
Cough34 (75.6%)14 (60.9%)0.364
Sputum production8 (17.8%)5 (21.7%)0.750
Myalgia or fatigue4 (8.9%)1 (4.3%)0.656
Dyspnoea3 (6.7%)1 (4.3%)1.000
Chills3 (6.7%)1 (4.3%)0.584
Temperature37.12 (±0.62)36.95 (±0.59)0.281
Heart rate89.44 (±13.67)87.09 (±15.85)0.526
Respiratory rate20.93 (±2.88)20.74 (±2.22)0.778
Baseline and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients The CT and laboratory tests of patients on admission were shown in Table 2. Most patients showed multiple lobe infection in both two groups, and no significant difference between this two groups (P=0.291). The red blood cell count (3.98x1012/L) and hemoglobin (122g/L) in the elderly group were lower than those in non-elderly group (4.64×1012/L and 138 g/L respectively). The C-reactive protein in the elderly group was higher than that in the young group (23.49 VS 9.93 mg/L, P = 0.047), but there was no significant difference in the procalcitonin between the two groups.
Table 2

CT and laboratory results of COVID-19 patients

CharacteristicsNon-elderly patientsElderly patientsP value
CT results0.291
Multiple lobe lesion35 (77.8%)22 (95.7%)
Right lobe lesion7 (15.6%)1 (4.3%)
Left lobe lesion2 (4.4%)0 (0%)
Normal1 (2.2%)0 (0%)
Laboratory indicators at admission
Leucocytes, × 109 per L5.37 (4.06–7.23)5.86 (4.32–7.54)0.841
Neutrophil count, × 109 per L3.26 (2.64–5.24)4.19 (2.40–5.38)0.795
Lymphocyte count, × 109 per L1.05 (0.65–1.62)0.90 (0.51–1.46)0.444
Neutrophils, %69.50 (61.55–79.45)74.10 (67.00–80.30)0.437
Lymphocytes, %22.40 (14.80–27.85)17.00 (11.10–26.70)0.396
Red blood cell count, × 1012 per L4.64 (4.15–4.99)3.98 (3.56–4.41)0.001
Haemoglobin, g/L138 (126–147)122 (103–136)0.002
Platelet count, × 109 per L175 (121–225)154 (111–239)0.382
Albumin, g/L42.90 (37.75–46.10)36 (32.95–40.93)0.001
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L27 (16–41)19 (15–24)0.082
Glutamyltransferase, U/L27 (22–33.5)30 (23–38)0.479
Total bilirubin, umol/L7.60 (5.25–14.80)6.45 (3.65–8.13)0.094
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L224 (200.5–274)241 (205–296)0.479
Creatine kinase isoenzymes, U/L12 (9–17)11 (9–17)0.862
CD3 Count, cells/ul666 (335.5–1022)460 (318–721)0.126
CD4 Count, cells/ul396 (180–517)313 (178–387)0.270
CD8 Count, cells/ul242 (137–334)192 (111–219)0.066
CD3 Percent72 (63–78)69 (66–75)0.131
CD4 Percent38 (31–46)39 (34–45)0.186
CD8 Percent25 (22–32)22 (17–30)0.058
CD4/CD8 rate1.48 (1.08–1.91)1.79 (1.24–2.40)0.126
B Count, cells/ul93 (59–140)68.50 (46.75–93.75)0.073
NK Count, cells/ul116 (59–159.5)103 (53–166.5)0.810
B Percent11.37 (9.10–15.47)9.80 (7.42–12.32)0.118
NK Percent13.76 (7.71–18.91)15.57 (10.87–22.24)0.143
Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.023 (0.019–0.044)0.028 (0.028–0.055)0.664
C-reactive protein, mg/L9.93 (4.22–22.95)23.49 (6.95–57.94)0.047
Plasma lactic acid, mmol/L1.62 (1.30–2.13)1.49 (1.20–1.81)0.172
CT and laboratory results of COVID-19 patients 82.6% of the elderly patients showed a decrease in CD8+ lymphocyte count, which was much higher than that of in non-elderly group (48.9%), P = 0.009. 77.8% of patients showed the decrease of B lymphocyte in elderly group, which was also higher than that in the non-elderly group (44.8%) (P = 0.036). However, there was no significant difference in cell counts and rates of lymphocyte subsets and NK cells between the two groups, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Abnormal laboratory results in two groups of COVID-19 patients

CharacteristicsNon-elderly patientsElderly patientsP value
Leucocytes (× 109 per L; normal range 3.5–9.5)0.584
Increased7 (15.6%)3 (13.0%)
Decreased4 (8.9%)4 (17.4%)
Neutrophils (× 109 per L; normal range 2–7)0.961
Increased7 (15.6%)3 (13.0%)
Lymphocytes (× 109 per L; normal range 0.8–4)0.422
Decreased14 (31.1%)10 (43.5%)
CD3 Count (cells/ul; normal range 770–2041)0.114
Decreased26 (57.8%)18 (78.3%)
CD4 Count (cells/ul; normal range 414–1123)0.065
Decreased24 (53.3%)18 (78.3%)
CD8 Count (cells/ul; normal range 238–874)0.009
Decreased22 (48.9%)19 (82.6%)
B Count (cells/ul; normal range 90–560)0.036
Decreased13 (44.8%)14 (77.8%)
NK Count (cells/ul; normal range 150–1100)1.000
Decreased21 (72.4%)13 (72.2%)
C-reactive protein (mg/L; normal range 0–5)0.389
Increased32 (71.1%)18 (81.8%)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L; normal range 0–37)0.067
Increased14 (31.1%)2 (9.1%)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L; normal range 0–37)0.745
Increased8 (17.8%)5 (22.7%)
Albumin (g/L; normal range 35–55)0.052
Decreased6 (13.3%)8 (36.4%)
Lactic dehydrogenase0.594
Increased16 (35.6%)10 (45.5%)
Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase0.193
Increased18 (40.0%)13 (59.1%)
Creatine jubase0.745
Increased8 (17.8%)5 (22.7%)
Abnormal laboratory results in two groups of COVID-19 patients

Comorbidities and the prognosis of elderly patients with COVID-19

The comorbidity of patients was shown in Table 1. Compared with non-elderly patients, old patients were more likely to combine with other basic diseases before infection of COVID-19 (P = 0.017). 13 (56.5%) elderly patients combined with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and the proportion was higher than that in the non-elderly group (9 (20.0%), P = 0.005). The proportion of patients with hypertension was higher in elderly group than in non-elderly group (43.5% and 8.9%, respectively, P = 0.003). Five patients (21.7%) in the elderly group had chronic pulmonary disease, but no in the non-elderly group (P = 0.003). The proportion of severe cases was higher in elderly group than that in non-elderly group (73.9% and 42.2%, respectively, P=0.012). During hospitalization, the proportion of elderly patients with respiratory failure was higher than that of in non-elderly patients (21.7% and 4.4%, respectively, P=0.039). Shock was also more common in older patients than non-elderly patients (21.7% vs 2.2%, P=0.015). And of the 6 patients with shock, 5 had a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The proportion of elderly patients requiring mechanical ventilation during treatment was higher than that of younger patients (30.4%, 8.9%, respectively, P=0.020). As shown in table 4, the prognosis of the elderly patients was worse than that of the non-elderly group (P=0.006). All 3 deaths were elderly patients with underlying diseases before admission. The level of C-reactive protein of these dead patients was significantly increased and the cell counts of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and NK cells were significantly decreased at admission, as shown in supplementary table 1.
Table 4

Prognosis of COVID-19 patients

CharacteristicsNon-elderly patientsElderly patientsP value
Severe cases19 (42.2%)17 (73.9%)0.012
Complications
Acute liver and kidney injury17 (37.8%)5 (21.7%)0.274
Coagulation function abnormal0 (0%)3 (13.0%)0.035
Respiratory failure2 (4.4%)5 (21.7%)0.039
Shock1 (2.2%)5 (21.7%)0.015
Oxygen support0.020
Low-flow nasal cannula36 (80.0%)11 (47.8%)
High-flow nasal cannula5 (11.1%)5 (21.7%)
Mechanical4 (8.9%)7 (30.4%)
Prognosis0.006
Discharge36 (80.0%)13 (56.5%)
Hospital readmission4 (8.9%)0 (0.0%)
Hospitalisation5 (11.1%)7 (30.4%)
Death0 (0.0%)3 (13.0%)
Days from illness onset to hospital admission7 (4–11.5)7 (2–8)0.711
Hospitalization days9 (7–12)10 (8–14)0.915
Prognosis of COVID-19 patients

Discussion

This study collected the clinical information of 68 patients with COVID-19 infection who hospitalized in Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu, Sichuan. The clinical characteristics of elderly patients with COVID-19 were descripted by compared with non-elderly patients. We observed more patients with COVID-19 were men which was same as the results of previous study (13–15). The proportion of elderly patients was 33.82%, which was similar to other studies (16, 15). In our study, the most common symptom were fever (78.3%) and cough (60.9%) in elderly patients, which was similar to other researches (17–19). A previous study found that the incidence of multilobe lesions in elderly patients was significantly higher than in non-elderly patients (16). We also observed the higher incidence of multilobe lesions in elderly patients, although no statistically difference. In this study, the proportion of patients with decreased leucocytes count was 11.8%, lymphocytes 35.3%, lower than that of in a previous study (33.7% and 83.2%, respectively) (20). The proportion of patients with a decreased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes in elderly patients was significantly higher than that in non-elderly group, suggesting that elderly patients were more likely to indicate low immune function. The previous study observed that the acute phase of SARS in humans was associated with a severe reduction in the number of T cells in the blood (21). The level of C-reactive protein in elderly patients was significantly higher than that in the non-elderly group, which was consistent with previous study and similar to MERS-CoV infection (22, 16). We found that the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 in elderly patients was worse, which was in accordance with the results of other studies (23, 24, 16). All 3 dead cases were elderly patients, and had multi-system disease before infected by COVID-19, with decreased umber of T lymphocyte subsets, B lymphocytes and NK cells. An investigation of 463 patients with COVID-19 disease revealed the decreased amount of total lymphocytes, T lymphocyte subsets in the severe type patients (25). Therefore, patients with COVID-19 should actively deal with their comorbidities, prevent bacterial infection and strengthen immune support treatment. This study found that older patients with COVID-19 indicated relatively higher proportion of comorbidities than non-elderly patients, and the most common comorbidities were atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (56.5%), hypertension (43.5%) and chronic pulmonary disease (21.7%), which was consistent with other studies (26, 15). These multiple disease coexisting in elderly patients affected each other and leaded to complicated and complex diseases. Severe patients were significantly more in elderly patients than non-elderly patients, which was in accordance with previous researches (27, 19). Comorbidities was a risk factor for severe cases (OR=2.95, P=0.035). We also observed that elderly patients indicated relatively higher proportion of complications, such as shock (21.7%). And of the 6 patients with shock, 5 had a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Therefore, actively dealing with the complications may improve the prognosis of patients. The co-occurrence of chronic diseases in the elderly is a common problem in the field of global public health (7). It was reported that more than half of the elderly in developed countries had more than three chronic diseases, meaning an individual suffers from two or more diseases with different pathology and no mutual dependence at the same time (8, 9). Studies in China such as Beijing and Shanghai suggest that more than 70 percent of elderly people in the community have two or more chronic diseases (10, 11). Compared with patients with a single disease, the hospitalization rate and fatality rate of patients with comorbidities are higher, and the clinical prognosis is significantly lower. A cohort study showed that comorbidities were independent predictors of clinical prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease (28). Comorbidities make medical decisions more complex and difficult. And, comorbidities often involve multiple medications, and the interactions between drugs and diseases often lead to worse final efficacy, worse prognosis, more adverse reactions and more medical costs (28). At present, there are no guidelines for comorbidity management. In 2012, the American geriatrics society organized an expert group to formulate the guiding principles for clinical management of comorbidity in the elderly, such as considering the complexity and feasibility of the treatment plan; optimize the treatment plan to choose the one that benefits the most, does the least damage and can improve the quality of life, and carry on the elaboration explanation one by one (9). Doctors should be reminded that the treatment of comorbidities should emphasize patient-centered treatment, considering the whole patient and giving the most appropriate individual treatment.

Limitations

There are some limitations in our study. First, not all COVID-19 cases in Sichuan were enrolled in this study, but only patients admitted to Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu. And the sample size of our study is relatively small. A study which cover wide population is needed to get more accurate results. Secondly, more detailed patient information was not analyzed, especially different treatment methods and their outcomes.

Conclusions

In this study we observed elderly patients infected with COVID-19 had a high proportion of severe cases and comorbidities, more likely to show low immune function and indicated higher proportion of complications during the course of COVID-19 infection. All dead cases were elderly patients and with low immunity and comorbidities. Therefore, we should pay more attention to elderly patients, especially their comorbidities, and try to give the most appropriate individual treatment for older patients with COVID-19 infection. Supplementary Table 1 Characteristics of dead patients with COVID-19
  22 in total

1.  Cohort Profile: The 1895, 1905, 1910 and 1915 Danish Birth Cohort Studies - secular trends in the health and functioning of the very old.

Authors:  Signe Høi Rasmussen; Karen Andersen-Ranberg; Mikael Thinggaard; Bernard Jeune; Axel Skytthe; Lene Christiansen; James W Vaupel; Matt McGue; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 202.731

3.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.

Authors:  Robert Verity; Lucy C Okell; Ilaria Dorigatti; Peter Winskill; Charles Whittaker; Natsuko Imai; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Hayley Thompson; Patrick G T Walker; Han Fu; Amy Dighe; Jamie T Griffin; Marc Baguelin; Sangeeta Bhatia; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Anne Cori; Zulma Cucunubá; Rich FitzJohn; Katy Gaythorpe; Will Green; Arran Hamlet; Wes Hinsley; Daniel Laydon; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Steven Riley; Sabine van Elsland; Erik Volz; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Xu; Xiao-Xin Wu; Xian-Gao Jiang; Kai-Jin Xu; Ling-Jun Ying; Chun-Lian Ma; Shi-Bo Li; Hua-Ying Wang; Sheng Zhang; Hai-Nv Gao; Ji-Fang Sheng; Hong-Liu Cai; Yun-Qing Qiu; Lan-Juan Li
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

6.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) model.

Authors:  Andrew Kingston; Louise Robinson; Heather Booth; Martin Knapp; Carol Jagger
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 9.  Characteristics of and Public Health Responses to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in China.

Authors:  Sheng-Qun Deng; Hong-Juan Peng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Understanding of COVID-19 based on current evidence.

Authors:  Pengfei Sun; Xiaosheng Lu; Chao Xu; Wenjuan Sun; Bo Pan
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.327

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity and Risk of Bias in Studies Examining Risk Factors for Severe Illness and Death in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abraham Degarege; Zaeema Naveed; Josiane Kabayundo; David Brett-Major
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Spread of COVID-19 Infection in Long-Term Care Facilities of Trieste (Italy) during the Pre-Vaccination Era, Integrating Findings of 41 Forensic Autopsies with Geriatric Comorbidity Index as a Valid Option for the Assessment of Strength of Causation.

Authors:  Martina Zanon; Michela Peruch; Monica Concato; Carlo Moreschi; Stefano Pizzolitto; Davide Radaelli; Stefano D'Errico
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 3.  COVID-19 mortality and its predictors in the elderly: A systematic review.

Authors:  Omid Dadras; SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi; Amirali Karimi; Ahmadreza Shamsabadi; Kowsar Qaderi; Maryam Ramezani; Seyed Peyman Mirghaderi; Sara Mahdiabadi; Farzin Vahedi; Solmaz Saeidi; Alireza Shojaei; Mohammad Mehrtak; Shiva A Azar; Esmaeil Mehraeen; Fabrício A Voltarelli
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 4.  Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Obesity and T2D: Literature Review.

Authors:  Jorge Pérez-Galarza; César Prócel; Cristina Cañadas; Diana Aguirre; Ronny Pibaque; Ricardo Bedón; Fernando Sempértegui; Hemmo Drexhage; Lucy Baldeón
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

5.  Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury Missed Diagnosis in Older Patients with Severe COVID-19 in Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Q Li; P Hu; H Kang; F Zhou
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Follow-Up Study of the Cardiopulmonary and Psychological Outcomes of COVID-19 Survivors Six Months After Discharge in Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Shuiping Dai; Bennan Zhao; Dafeng Liu; Yongzhao Zhou; Yaling Liu; Lijuan Lan; Yalun Li; Wenxin Luo; Yilan Zeng; Weimin Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-10-27

7.  Evaluation of the Health Situation among Recovered Cases of COVID-19 in West Bank, Palestine, and Their Onset/Recovery Time.

Authors:  Hani Naseef; Abdallah Damin Abukhalil; Tala Orabi; Mohammad Joza; Carmen Mashaala; Malak Elsheik; Aseel Dababat; Maram Qattosa; Ni'Meh Al-Shami
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-03-21

8.  Investigation of a COVID-19 Outbreak and Its Successful Containment in a Long Term Care Facility in Qatar.

Authors:  Hanadi Al Hamad; Manal Mustafa Mohd Malkawi; Jameela Ali A A Al Ajmi; Mariam Nooh J H Al-Mutawa; Sanjay Harish Doiphode; Brijesh Sathian
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26

9.  COVID-19 fatalities by zip codes and socioeconomic indicators across various U.S. regions.

Authors:  Brendon Sen-Crowe; I-Chun Lin; Robert Alfaro; Mark McKenney; Adel Elkbuli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-12

10.  Editorial: Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging: Summary of Recent Work and Future Directions.

Authors:  P de Souto Barreto; J G Ruiz; R A Merchant
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.075

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.