Literature DB >> 33365516

The complete chloroplast genome of an Antarctic moss Syntrichia filaris (Müll.Hal.) R.H. Zander.

Seok Cheol Kim1, Mi Young Byun2, Ji Hee Kim1, Hyoungseok Lee2,3.   

Abstract

Syntrichia filaris is one of the common mosses in the northern maritime Antarctic. In this study, we determined the complete chloroplast genome of S. filaris (GenBank accession number MK852705) to provide a genetic resource for phylogenetic study on Bryophytes. It is of 136,227 bp length, containing 8 ribosomal RNA (rRNA), 37 transfer RNA, and 85 protein-coding genes. The chloroplast genome structure and gene order were similar to other bryophytes. Phylogenetic tree based on combined amino acids sequences of 72 chloroplast genes common in S. filaris, 7 Bryophyta, 1 Anthocerotophyta, and 2 Marchantiophyta, was congruent with the traditional position of Pottiales in Bryophytes.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antarctic; Pottiales; Syntrichia filaris; chloroplast genome

Year:  2019        PMID: 33365516      PMCID: PMC7687419          DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1627945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour        ISSN: 2380-2359            Impact factor:   0.658


The genus Syntrichia Bird. is cosmopolitan and its diversity is conspicuously high in the cool temperate and polar regions in the Southern Hemisphere. Syntrichia filaris is mostly common in the northern maritime Antarctic and one of the principal components of the moss hummock subformation predominantly developed in places with running water (Ochyra 1998; Ochyra et al. 2008). Syntrichia filaris is reddish or yellowish brown and frequently misidentified as Hennediella species in the wet habitats. Recently, the genomic resources of mitogenome and chloroplast genome from the Antarctic bryophyte specimens have been provided (Liu et al. 2014; Yoon et al. 2016; Byun et al. 2019). However, the genomic data of the Antarctic moss are still limited. In this study, we determined the complete chloroplast genome sequence of S. filaris to provide the genetic resources for better understanding of phylogenetic relationship between closely related genera within Pottiaceae which has been known to be one of the most taxonomically difficult families. Moss samples were collected from a population growing under natural conditions near the King Sejong Antarctic Station (62°13′11.3′′S; 58°45′88.4′′W), on the Barton Peninsula of King George Island in January 2013. The dried specimen was deposited into KOPRI Herbarium (https://kvh.kopri.re.kr) in Korea (KOPRI-MO00565). Total genomic DNA was extracted from a 1 cm2 patch of S. filaris and used to prepare the library with TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Paired-ends reads were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq 2 × 300 bp (Illumina) and de novo assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench V7.5 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). All contigs were blasted to the Syntrichia ruralis chloroplast genome (GenBank accession number NC_012052), and Sanger sequencing methods were performed to verify the results or any ambiguous regions in the contig. BLAST, GeSeq (Tillich et al. 2017), were used to align and annotate the chloroplast genome. The complete chloroplast genome of S. filaris (GenBank accession number MK852705) has a total length of 136,227 bp (145× average coverage). Its GC ratio is 28.25%, similar to those of S. ruralis (28.34%) and Physcomitrella patens (28.51%), and it contains 8 ribosomal RNA (rRNA), 37 transfer RNA, and 85 protein-coding genes. The chloroplast genome structure and gene order were similar to other bryophytes. To construct a phylogenetic tree to represent the position within Bryophytes, we compared amino acids sequences from 72 chloroplast genes of S. filaris with publicly available 7 Bryophyta, 1 Anthocerotophyta, and 2 Marchantiophyta. Alignment was conducted by MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013) and downstream analyses were performed using the program MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016). Phylogenetic tree was constructed from the datasets using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the JTT matrix-based model (Figure 1). The result provides convincing support for many traditionally recognized families and identifies higher level phylogenetic structure as in the previous reports with mitogenome analysis of S. filaris (Liu et al. 2014; Yoon et al. 2016).
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic position of Syntrichia filaris determined by using the maximum likelihood method based on combined analysis with amino acids sequences of 72 chloroplast genes common in all taxa. The bootstrap values of 1000 replicates are presented near the corresponding branch. Sequences from hornwort and liverworts were used as outgroup. GenBank accession number of chloroplast genomes used are Anthoceros formosae (NC_004543), Marchantia polymorpha (NC_037507), Orthotrichum rogeri (NC_026212), Pellia endiviifolia (NC_019628), Physcomitrella patens (NC_037465), Sanionia uncinata (NC_025668), Sphagnum palustre (NC_030198), Syntrichia filaris (MK852705), Syntrichia ruralis (NC_012052), Takakia lepidozioides (NC_028738), and Tetraphis pellucida (NC_024291).

Phylogenetic position of Syntrichia filaris determined by using the maximum likelihood method based on combined analysis with amino acids sequences of 72 chloroplast genes common in all taxa. The bootstrap values of 1000 replicates are presented near the corresponding branch. Sequences from hornwort and liverworts were used as outgroup. GenBank accession number of chloroplast genomes used are Anthoceros formosae (NC_004543), Marchantia polymorpha (NC_037507), Orthotrichum rogeri (NC_026212), Pellia endiviifolia (NC_019628), Physcomitrella patens (NC_037465), Sanionia uncinata (NC_025668), Sphagnum palustre (NC_030198), Syntrichia filaris (MK852705), Syntrichia ruralis (NC_012052), Takakia lepidozioides (NC_028738), and Tetraphis pellucida (NC_024291). The information of the S. filaris chloroplast genome will be useful for evolutionary studies with organelle genomes of the bryophytes, including Antarctic species.
  5 in total

1.  350 my of mitochondrial genome stasis in mosses, an early land plant lineage.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Rafael Medina; Bernard Goffinet
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The complete mitochondrial genome of an Antarctic moss Syntrichia filaris (Müll.Hal.) R.H. Zander.

Authors:  Young-Jun Yoon; Yoonjee Kang; Mi-Kyeong Kim; Jungeun Lee; Hyun Park; Ji Hee Kim; Hyoungseok Lee
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.514

4.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  GeSeq - versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes.

Authors:  Michael Tillich; Pascal Lehwark; Tommaso Pellizzer; Elena S Ulbricht-Jones; Axel Fischer; Ralph Bock; Stephan Greiner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The complete chloroplast genome of a moss Korea Climacium dendroides (Hedw.) F. Weber & D. Mohr.

Authors:  Yeong-Deok Han; Youngeun Choi; SeungJin Park; Yong-Su Park; Young-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 0.658

2.  The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of Scopelophila cataractae (Mitt.) Broth. (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta).

Authors:  Yuya Inoue; Miho Nakahara-Tsubota; Hiromi Tsubota
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 0.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.