| Literature DB >> 33365230 |
Lixian Liu1,2,3, Huiting Huan1,2,3, Wei Li1, Andreas Mandelis2,3, Yafei Wang3, Le Zhang1, Xueshi Zhang1, Xukun Yin1, Yuxiang Wu1, Xiaopeng Shao1.
Abstract
Enhancement of trace gas detectability using photoacoustic spectroscopy requires the effective suppression of strong background noise for practical applications. An upgraded infrared broadband trace gas detection configuration was investigated based on a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer equipped with specially designed T-resonators and simultaneous differential optical and photoacoustic measurement capabilities. By using acetylene and local air as appropriate samples, the detectivity of the differential photoacoustic mode was demonstrated to be far better than the pure optical approach both theoretically and experimentally, due to the effectiveness of light-correlated coherent noise suppression of non-intrinsic optical baseline signals. The wavelet domain denoising algorithm with the optimized parameters was introduced in detail to greatly improve the signal-to-noise ratio by denoising the incoherent ambient interference with respect to the differential photoacoustic measurement. The results showed enhancement of sensitivity to acetylene from 5 ppmv (original differential mode) to 806 ppbv, a fivefold improvement. With the suppression of background noise accomplished by the optimized wavelet domain denoising algorithm, the broadband differential photoacoustic trace gas detection was shown to be an effective approach for trace gas detection.Entities:
Keywords: Differential detection mode; Fourier-transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy; Gas detection sensitivity; Noise elimination; Wavelet domain denoising
Year: 2020 PMID: 33365230 PMCID: PMC7749430 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Photoacoustics ISSN: 2213-5979
Fig. 1Schematic of the experimental setup.
Fig. 2Experimental results of the two PA T-cells.
Fig. 3Performance of differential optical and photoacoustic spectra in non-absorbing gas.
Fig. 4Three modes spectra of 25 ppmv acetylene and ambient air.
Fig. 5The PA spectral SNR improvement by means of WDD denoising methods.
Fig. 6The spectral SSIM processed by denoising methods.
Fig. 7The denoised differential PA spectra of 25 ppmv acetylene.
Trace gas detection results comparisons.
| Gas | Technique | Incident source/Power | Absorption peak (cm−1) | Absorption cross-section (cm2/molecule) | Background gas | Denoising method | LOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH4 | FTIR-PAS | Bruker FTIR source | 3017 | 1.49 × 10−18 | N2 | / | 0.5 ppm [ |
| H2S | QEPAS | QCL | 97.11 | 5.75 × 10−21 | N2 | / | 30 ppm [ |
| CO2 | TDLAS | DFB laser | 4978.2 | 3.79 × 10−22 | N2 | Kalman filter | 61.9 ppm [ |
| CO | TDLAS | DFB | 6380.32 | 1.02 × 10−22 | N2 | EMD | 2 ppm [ |
| CO2 | FTIR-PAS | Bruker FTIR source /8 μW | 2349 | 6.50 × 10−18 | Air | / | 2ppmv [ |
| C2H2 | DPAS | Bruker FTIR source /30 μW | 1360 | 2.78 × 10−19 | Air | WDD | 806 ppbv |
QEPAS: quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy.
TDLAS: tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy.
QCL: quantum cascade laser.
DFB laser: distributed feedback laser.
EMD: empirical mode decomposition algorithm.
Fig. 8Photoacoustic amplitude response vs. concentration.
Fig. 9Differential PA amplitude response vs. concentration.
Fig. 10The trace gas detection calculation flowchart with the differential mode and WDD algorithm.