Literature DB >> 33364894

Hemolytic Anemia Due To Anti-c Incompatibility in The Newborn Period: A Case Report.

Ilkay Ozmeral Odabasi1, Sinan Uslu1, Evrim Kiray Bas1, Ali Bulbul1, Ebru Turkoglu Unal1, Duygu Besnili Acar1, Ahmet Tellioglu1, Mehmet Fatih Ileri2.   

Abstract

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a disease that is caused by maternal alloantibodies to the fetus. In the literature, the frequency of hemolytic disease of the newborn due to Rh (D) sensitization decreased inversely with the increase in the use of anti-D gammaglobulin. However, the importance of minor blood group incompatibilities has increased in the etiology. Clinical presentation in patients with minor blood group incompatibility may vary from subclinical hemolysis findings to active hemolysis and hyperbilirubinemia requiring blood exchange. In this case study, we present a patient with hemolytic anemia due to anti-c antibody incompatibility. Copyright:
© 2020 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-c antibody incompatibility; anemia; newborn

Year:  2020        PMID: 33364894      PMCID: PMC7751246          DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.10693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul        ISSN: 1302-7123


Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn refers to the hemolysis of fetal or neonatal erythrocytes by maternal alloantibodies. Maternal alloantibodies against erythrocyte antigens other than Rh (D) may rarely cause clinically significant hemolysis in the fetal and neonatal period. The frequency of hemolytic disease of the newborn due to Rh (D) incompatibility decreased with the increase in the use of anti-D gammaglobulin. However, the importance of minor blood group incompatibilities in etiology has increased.[1] In this article, a case with anti-c antibody incompatibility, which is a rare cause of anemia, is presented and neonatal hemolytic diseases due to subgroup incompatibilities are reviewed.

Case Report

The baby, who was born from the second pregnancy of a 23-year-old mother at 38 weeks of gestation through a normal vaginal route, with a weight of 2650 g and who did not develop postnatal adaptation problems, had normal vital signs in the physical examination performed immediately after birth, but the skin color was clearly pale. Complete blood count revealed hemoglobin: 6.6 g/dL, hematocrit: 24%, MCV: 109.1 fL, platelet count: 302.000/mm3 and white blood cell count: 26.000/mm3. The reticulocyte count was 11%. There were target cells, teardrop erythrocytes and anisocytosis in the peripheral blood smear. Mother and baby blood types were A Rh (+) and Direct Coombs test was (-). The baby was taken to the neonatal intensive care unit due to anemia. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase enzyme levels, thyroid hormones and hemoglobin electrophoresis were normal in the etiological examinations of the baby who had no signs of insufficiency. TORCH and Parvovirus serology was negative. Cranial and abdominal ultrasonographies were normal. Tandem mass spectrometry test was normal. When the mother and baby minor blood groups were evaluated, Kell (-) E (+) e (+) C (+) c (-) and Kell (-) E (+) e (+) C (+) c (+) were determined, respectively. With the current clinical and laboratory findings, the patient, who was thought to have the hemolytic disease due to c minor blood group incompatibility was transfused with a subgroup-compatible erythrocyte suspension on the postnatal first day. No decrease in hematocrit level was observed in the follow-up. The patient, who did not develop hyperbilirubinemia and the need for transfusion, was discharged on the postnatal fifth day for outpatient control. Hemolytic anemia did not develop in the outpatient clinic follow-up during the neonatal period.

Discussion

The Rh blood group system is one of the most complex human blood groups identified. At least 45 Rh antigens have been identified, and the most important ones are D, C, c, E and e antigens.[2, 3] These antigens are encoded by the RHD and RHCE genes on the first chromosome.[2] It has been reported that minor blood group incompatibility is responsible for 3-5% of haemolytic jaundice in the newborn.[4] More than 70 red cell antigens may create antibodies. Among the minor blood group antigens, the most common causes of incompatibility between mother and baby are Kell, C, c, E, e, Diego, Duffy, Kidd and MNS.[5] While multispecific antibodies are detected in 8-14% of the cases, the most common combination is an anti-c and anti-E combination.[6] Anti-c alloimmunization, with or without anti-E, is present in 0.07% of all pregnancies, with few case reports with Rh antibodies other than anti-D (anti-c and anti-E) that cause hemolytic disease of the newborn.[7, 8] In the study of Geifman-Holtzman et al. examining minor blood group incompatibility between mother and baby, anti-Kell incompatibility was reported as 22%, anti-D as 18.4%, anti-E as 14%, anti-c as 5.8% and anti-C as 4.7%.[9] Anti-c antibody incompatibility was found in our case, which is a rare cause of anemia. Anti-c antibodies may occur due to exposures, such as fetomaternal hemorrhage, abruptio placentae, spontaneous or therapeutic abortion, cesarean delivery, ectopic pregnancy or transfusion.[10] They may cause acute or delayed hemolytic reactions. As with the D antigen, pregnant women are sensitized to c-antigen during the first pregnancy and complications occur with re-exposure in subsequent pregnancies.[11] Maternal IgM antibodies are formed in the first step in response to antigenic stimulation. However, since these antibodies cannot cross the placenta, they do not cause sensitization in the fetus. Ig G type antibodies formed by the continuation of antigenic stimulation transplacentally pass to the fetus and cause clinical symptoms in the newborn.[1] Our case also suggested that the mother was sensitized in her first pregnancy. Hemolytic disease due to minor blood group incompatibility may present a wide clinical presentation from hydrops fetalis and intrauterine losses during pregnancy to subclinical hemolysis, active hemolysis and hyperbilirubinaemia requiring exchange transfusion in the neonatal period.[4, 5, 12] Anti-c antibodies are known to cause the heaviest hemolytic clinical picture.[5, 13] In Dajak et al.’s study evaluating the relationship between maternal transfusion and fetal/neonatal hemolysis, 14 of 44 hemolysis cases except anti-D developed severe hemolysis, and eight of the cases with severe hemolysis were anti-c antibody positive.[14] In Wenk et al.’s study evaluating 70 anti-c positive cases, eight of the cases ended with hydropic birth and perinatal death, 26% of the cases had a mild hemolytic disease that did not require transfusion after birth, and moderate hemolytic disease in need of transfusion was detected in 29%.[15] Although our case presented with severe hemolytic anemia requiring transfusion, no hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, intravenous immunoglobulin or blood exchange developed, which suggests that the severity of hemolysis and the time of the onset of the hemolytic process may be the cause of clinical variation. The positivity rate of the direct Coombs test is not directly proportional to the severity of the disease. In a study conducted in the United States of America, the direct Coombs test was positive in 46 babies (84%) born from 55 anti-c alloimmunized pregnancies between 1967-2001, and only 12 (26%) of these babies developed severe hemolytic disease requiring exchange transfusion.[10] Direct Coombs test positivity was reported in approximately one-third of cases with subgroup incompatibility. In cases with signs of hemolytic anemia, the direct Coombs test is not always positive, and a negative test does not indicate that incompatibility will not develop. The weak antigenic properties of minor red cell antigens may the cause of this condition.[1] Although our case was direct Coombs test negative, our case was in the group that developed clinical findings. In conclusion, minor blood group incompatibilities should be kept in mind among the causes of hemolysis in cases with a negative direct Coombs test with hemolytic disease findings.
  10 in total

1.  Haemolytic disease of the newborn caused by anti-c, anti-E and anti-Fya antibodies: report of five cases.

Authors:  A Babinszki; R L Berkowitz
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  The Rh blood group system: a review.

Authors:  N D Avent; M E Reid
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Non-anti-D antibodies in red-cell alloimmunization.

Authors:  K J Moise
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Management of pregnancies complicated by anti-c isoimmunization.

Authors:  David N Hackney; Eric J Knudtson; Karen Q Rossi; Dave Krugh; Richard W O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  The Rh blood group system in review: a new face for the next decade.

Authors:  Connie M Westhoff
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 6.  Female alloimmunization with antibodies known to cause hemolytic disease.

Authors:  O Geifman-Holtzman; M Wojtowycz; E Kosmas; R Artal
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Anti-c (Little c) IgM: An Uncommonly Observed but Expected Phenomenon.

Authors:  Alan A George; Clayton D Simon
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2014

8.  [Fetomaternal anti-RH3, -4 (anti-E and anti-c) rhesus isoimmunization: a case report].

Authors:  L Farnault; P Garcia-Meric; A Cortey; F Arnaud
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.180

9.  Relationship between previous maternal transfusions and haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn mediated by non-RhD antibodies.

Authors:  Slavica Dajak; Srđana Culić; Vedran Stefanović; Jelena Lukačević
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  Alloimmunization by hr'(c), hemolytic disease of newborns, and perinatal management.

Authors:  R E Wenk; P Goldstein; J K Felix
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.