| Literature DB >> 33364878 |
Sibel Ocak Serin1, Ozlem Pehlivan1, Aysun Isiklar2, Ahmet Tahra3, Sema Ucak Basat1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In the literature, the effects of vitamin D on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have been investigated. Conflicting results have been reported in these studies conducted. LUTS is more common in women. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and LUTS in female patients using the uroflowmetric method.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium levels; lower urinary tract symptoms; uroflowmetry; vitamin D; women
Year: 2020 PMID: 33364878 PMCID: PMC7751233 DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.01709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul ISSN: 1302-7123
Assessments according to vitamin D levels
| Vitamin D (ng/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n=186) | <20 (n=104) | ≥20 (n=82) | P | |
| Age (year) | ||||
| Mean±SD | 56.85±12.95 | 55.43±14.16 | 58.65±11.07 | |
| 18-50 | 45 (24.2) | 31 (29.8) | 14 (17.1) | |
| ≥51 | 141(75.8) | 73 (70.2) | 68 (82.9) | |
| Ca (mg/dl) | 9.40±0.48 | 9.32±0.52 | 9.50±0.40 | [ |
| SCr (mg/dl) | 0.78±0.24 | 0.79±0.3 | 0.77±0.12 | |
| Qmax (ml/sn) | 35.41±12.63 | 34.88±12.87 | 36.07±12.36 | [ |
| Qav (ml/sn) | 18.60±6.77 | 18.13±6.62 | 19.18±6.95 | |
| V (ml) | 446.60±165.08 | 438.96±173.81 | 456.28±153.81 | |
| HT | 115 (61.8) | 56 (53.8) | 59 (72) | |
| DM | 92 (49.5) | 51 (49) | 41 (50) | |
| CVD | 17 (9.1) | 9 (8.7) | 8 (9.8) | |
| HL | 46 (24.7) | 19 (18.3) | 27 (32.9) | |
| Diuretic | 24 (12.9) | 13 (12.5) | 11 (13.4) | |
Student t-test;
Mann-Whitney U Test;
Pearson Ki-kare Test; fFisher-Freeman-Halton Test;
p<0.05; Ca: Calcium; SCr: Serum creatinine; Qmax: maximum urine flow rate; Qav: average urine flow rate; V: voided volume; HT: Hypertension; DM: Diabetes mellitus; CVD: Serebrovascular desease; HL: Hyperlipidemia.
The correlation analysis between uroflowmetry parameters and vitamin D levels
| Vitamin D (ng/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|
| r | p | |
| Age (year) | 0.095 | 0.198 |
| Ca (mg/dl) | 0.194 | 0.008 |
| SCr (mg/dl) | 0.111 | 0.133 |
| Qmax | 0.094 | 0.204 |
| Q ort | 0.104 | 0.158 |
| V | 0.068 | 0.355 |
r: Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient
p<0.01; Ca: Calcium; SCr: Serum creatinine; Qmax: maximum urine flow rate; Qav: average urine flow rate; V: voided volume.
The correlation analysis between uroflowmetry parameters and calcium according to vitamin D levels
| Vitamin D (ng/ml) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 (n=104) | ≥ 20 (n=82) | Total (n=186) | ||||
| r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| Ca - Qmax | -0.069 | 0.487 | 0.078 | 0.487 | -0.015 | 0.834 |
| Ca - Qav | -0.047 | 0.637 | 0.103 | 0.359 | 0.010 | 0.892 |
| Ca – V | -0.199 | 0.042 | 0.073 | 0.513 | -0.108 | 0.142 |
r: Spearman rank correlation;
p<0.05 Ca: Calcium; Qmax: maximum urine flow rate, Qav: average urine flow rate; V: voided volume.