Xin Zhao1,2, Lei Wang1,2, Joseph H R Maes3. 1. Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health of Gansu Province, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China. 2. School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China. 3. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, Nijmegen 6500 HE, the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Heroin abuse is associated with cognitive deficits. These might play a role in relapse after abstinence, which could be reduced by cognitive trainings. A previous study assessed effects of working memory (WM) training on executive functioning (EF) in heroin addicts undergoing methadone treatment, potentially limiting training effects. The present study assessed WM training effects in abstinent heroin addicts currently no longer receiving pharmacological treatment. METHOD: Inpatients were randomly assigned to a WM training or active control condition and performed EF tasks before and after training. RESULTS: Trained participants improved their performance on the trained task. Using the control group as reference, they showed short-lived beneficial near- but no far-transfer effects to non-trained cognitive tasks. Participants with a strong baseline WM showed stronger training but smaller transfer effects than participants with a weak baseline WM. CONCLUSION: The combined results suggest limited cognitive transfer effects of WM training in heroin addicts irrespective of current methadone treatment status. They also suggest individual differences in training and transfer benefits dependent on baseline EF.
OBJECTIVE: Heroin abuse is associated with cognitive deficits. These might play a role in relapse after abstinence, which could be reduced by cognitive trainings. A previous study assessed effects of working memory (WM) training on executive functioning (EF) in heroin addicts undergoing methadone treatment, potentially limiting training effects. The present study assessed WM training effects in abstinent heroin addicts currently no longer receiving pharmacological treatment. METHOD: Inpatients were randomly assigned to a WM training or active control condition and performed EF tasks before and after training. RESULTS: Trained participants improved their performance on the trained task. Using the control group as reference, they showed short-lived beneficial near- but no far-transfer effects to non-trained cognitive tasks. Participants with a strong baseline WM showed stronger training but smaller transfer effects than participants with a weak baseline WM. CONCLUSION: The combined results suggest limited cognitive transfer effects of WM training in heroin addicts irrespective of current methadone treatment status. They also suggest individual differences in training and transfer benefits dependent on baseline EF.
Authors: Mieke H J Schulte; Janna Cousijn; Tess E den Uyl; Anna E Goudriaan; Wim van den Brink; Dick J Veltman; Thelma Schilt; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Clin Psychol Rev Date: 2014-08-20
Authors: Antonio Verdejo; Inmaculada Toribio; Carmen Orozco; Krista Lee Puente; Miguel Pérez-García Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Olga Rass; Rebecca L Schacht; Katherine Buckheit; Matthew W Johnson; Eric C Strain; Miriam Z Mintzer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 4.492