Alessandro Cattoni1, Silvia Molinari1, Francesco Medici1, Paola De Lorenzo2,3, Maria Grazia Valsecchi2, Nicoletta Masera1, Marta Adavastro1, Andrea Biondi1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Fondazione MBBM, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. 2. Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy. 3. Tettamanti Research Center, Pediatric Clinic, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Abstract
Context: dexamethasone has been demonstrated to elicit GH secretion in adults, but few data are available about its effectiveness as a provocative stimulus in the diagnostic work-up of GH deficiency (GHD) in childhood. Objective: to assess the clinical value of dexamethasone stimulation test (DST) as a diagnostic tool for pediatric GHD. Design and setting: retrospective single-center analysis. The study population included 166 patients with a pathological response to arginine stimulation test (AST, first-line test) and subsequently tested with either insulin tolerance test (ITT) or DST as a second-line investigation between 2008 and 2019. Main outcome measures: comparison between GH peaks and secretory curves induced by ITT and DST; degree of agreement between DST and AST versus ITT and AST. Results: the pathological response to AST (GH peak < 8 ng/mL) was confirmed by an ITT in 80.2% (89/111) of patients and by a DST in 76.4% (42/55), with no statistical difference between the two groups (p value 0.69). Mean GH peaks achieved after ITT and DST were entirely comparable (6.59 ± 3.59 versus 6.50 ± 4.09 ng/ml, respectively, p 0.97) and statistically higher than those elicited by arginine (p < 0.01 for both), irrespectively of the average GH peaks recorded for each patient (Bland-Altman method). Dexamethasone elicited a longer lasting and later secretory response than AST and ITT. No side effects were recorded after DST. Conclusions: DST and ITT confirmed GHD in a superimposable percentage of patients with a pathological first-line test. DST and ITT share a similar secretagogue potency, overall greater than AST.
Context:dexamethasone has been demonstrated to elicit GH secretion in adults, but few data are available about its effectiveness as a provocative stimulus in the diagnostic work-up of GH deficiency (GHD) in childhood. Objective: to assess the clinical value of dexamethasone stimulation test (DST) as a diagnostic tool for pediatric GHD. Design and setting: retrospective single-center analysis. The study population included 166 patients with a pathological response to arginine stimulation test (AST, first-line test) and subsequently tested with either insulin tolerance test (ITT) or DST as a second-line investigation between 2008 and 2019. Main outcome measures: comparison between GH peaks and secretory curves induced by ITT and DST; degree of agreement between DST and AST versus ITT and AST. Results: the pathological response to AST (GH peak < 8 ng/mL) was confirmed by an ITT in 80.2% (89/111) of patients and by a DST in 76.4% (42/55), with no statistical difference between the two groups (p value 0.69). Mean GH peaks achieved after ITT and DST were entirely comparable (6.59 ± 3.59 versus 6.50 ± 4.09 ng/ml, respectively, p 0.97) and statistically higher than those elicited by arginine (p < 0.01 for both), irrespectively of the average GH peaks recorded for each patient (Bland-Altman method). Dexamethasone elicited a longer lasting and later secretory response than AST and ITT. No side effects were recorded after DST. Conclusions: DST and ITT confirmed GHD in a superimposable percentage of patients with a pathological first-line test. DST and ITT share a similar secretagogue potency, overall greater than AST.
Authors: Mark E Molitch; David R Clemmons; Saul Malozowski; George R Merriam; Mary Lee Vance Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: E Ghigo; J Bellone; G Aimaretti; S Bellone; S Loche; M Cappa; E Bartolotta; F Dammacco; F Camanni Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 5.958