Literature DB >> 33362662

Can Psychodynamically Oriented Early Prevention for "Children-at-Risk" in Urban Areas With High Social Problem Density Strengthen Their Developmental Potential? A Cluster Randomized Trial of Two Kindergarten-Based Prevention Programs.

Tamara Fischmann1,2, Lorena K Asseburg2, Jonathan Green3, Felicitas Hug2, Verena Neubert2, Ming Wan3, Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber2,4.   

Abstract

Children who live on the margins of society are disadvantaged in achieving their developmental potential because of the lack of a necessary stable environment and nurturing care. Many early prevention programs aim at mitigating such effects, but often the evaluation of their long-term effect is missing. The aim of the study presented here was to evaluate such long-term effects in two prevention programs for children-at-risk growing up in deprived social environments focusing on child attachment representation as the primary outcome as well as on self-reflective capacities of teachers taking care of these children. The latter was a key component for promoting resilient behavior in children. Five hundred and twenty-six children aged 36 to 60 months at risk due to immigration status, low family socio-economic status and child behavior were examined in a cluster-randomized study comparing two preventions, the psychodynamic, attachment-based holistic approach EARLY STEPS (ES) with the classroom based FAUSTLOS (FA) for their efficacy. Primary outcome was the child attachment representation measured by the Manchester Child Attachment Story Task (MCAST). Secondary outcomes were derived from (a) the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF: problem behaviors, including anxiety/depressive symptoms, emotional-reactive and somatic problems, social withdrawal, aggressive behavior, and attention deficit), from (b) the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ, parent version: resilience and wellbeing) and (c) Self-Reflective Scales for teachers (SRS: self-reflective capacities of teachers). Compared to baseline, attachment and behavioral problems improved in both programs. ES led to more secure and more organized attachment representations (medium effect sizes). Aggressive behavior and externalizing problems were reduced in the FA group compared with ES, particularly in boys (medium effect sizes). Self-reflective capacities of the teachers increased only in the ES group. High correlation between children's attachment type with the number of social risk factors and the increase of problematic social behavior strongly indicate that an increase in teachers' self-reflective capacities helps to change children's attachment patterns which thus strengthens the resilience of these children-at-risk [An ethical vote from LPPKJP 2009-02-25 was obtained and the trial registered; Clinical trial registration information: The trial was registered 14.02.2012 (DRKS00003500; https://www.drks.de)].
Copyright © 2020 Fischmann, Asseburg, Green, Hug, Neubert, Wan and Leuzinger-Bohleber.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children at risk; object attachment; prevention program evaluation; randomized controlled trial; resilience; risk/protective factor

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362662      PMCID: PMC7759147          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  33 in total

Review 1.  Developmental neurobiology of childhood stress and trauma.

Authors:  Martin H Teicher; Susan L Andersen; Ann Polcari; Carl M Anderson; Carryl P Navalta
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2002-06

2.  Resilience under conditions of extreme stress: a multilevel perspective.

Authors:  Dante Cicchetti
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

Authors:  R Goodman
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 4.  Biologic findings of post-traumatic stress disorder and child maltreatment.

Authors:  Michael D De Bellis; Lisa A Thomas
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship.

Authors:  Peter Fonagy; Elizabeth Allison
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 6.  Toward understanding the impact of trauma on the early developing human brain.

Authors:  Moriah E Thomason; Hilary A Marusak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Biological aging in childhood and adolescence following experiences of threat and deprivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie L Colich; Maya L Rosen; Eileen S Williams; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Developmental psychobiology and response to threats: relevance to trauma in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Daniel S Pine
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  Disorganized attachment in infancy: a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers.

Authors:  Pehr Granqvist; L Alan Sroufe; Mary Dozier; Erik Hesse; Miriam Steele; Marinus van Ijzendoorn; Judith Solomon; Carlo Schuengel; Pasco Fearon; Marian Bakermans-Kranenburg; Howard Steele; Jude Cassidy; Elizabeth Carlson; Sheri Madigan; Deborah Jacobvitz; Sarah Foster; Kazuko Behrens; Anne Rifkin-Graboi; Naomi Gribneau; Gottfried Spangler; Mary J Ward; Mary True; Susan Spieker; Sophie Reijman; Samantha Reisz; Anne Tharner; Frances Nkara; Ruth Goldwyn; June Sroufe; David Pederson; Deanne Pederson; Robert Weigand; Daniel Siegel; Nino Dazzi; Kristin Bernard; Peter Fonagy; Everett Waters; Sheree Toth; Dante Cicchetti; Charles H Zeanah; Karlen Lyons-Ruth; Mary Main; Robbie Duschinsky
Journal:  Attach Hum Dev       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.

Authors:  Paul Madley-Dowd; Rachael Hughes; Kate Tilling; Jon Heron
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.