Literature DB >> 33362490

Feasibility and Safety of Bilateral Hybrid EEG/EOG Brain/Neural-Machine Interaction.

Marius Nann1,2, Niels Peekhaus1,2, Cornelius Angerhöfer1,2, Surjo R Soekadar1,2.   

Abstract

Cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs) often lead to loss of motor function in both hands and legs, limiting autonomy and quality of life. While it was shown that unilateral hand function can be restored after SCI using a hybrid electroencephalography/electrooculography (EEG/EOG) brain/neural hand exoskeleton (B/NHE), it remained unclear whether such hybrid paradigm also could be used for operating two hand exoskeletons, e.g., in the context of bimanual tasks such as eating with fork and knife. To test whether EEG/EOG signals allow for fluent and reliable as well as safe and user-friendly bilateral B/NHE control, eight healthy participants (six females, mean age 24.1 ± 3.2 years) as well as four chronic tetraplegics (four males, mean age 51.8 ± 15.2 years) performed a complex sequence of EEG-controlled bilateral grasping and EOG-controlled releasing motions of two exoskeletons visually presented on a screen. A novel EOG command performed by prolonged horizontal eye movements (>1 s) to the left or right was introduced as a reliable switch to activate either the left or right exoskeleton. Fluent EEG control was defined as average "time to initialize" (TTI) grasping motions below 3 s. Reliable EEG control was assumed when classification accuracy exceeded 80%. Safety was defined as "time to stop" (TTS) all unintended grasping motions within 2 s. After the experiment, tetraplegics were asked to rate the user-friendliness of bilateral B/NHE control using Likert scales. Average TTI and accuracy of EEG-controlled operations ranged at 2.14 ± 0.66 s and 85.89 ± 15.81% across healthy participants and at 1.90 ± 0.97 s and 81.25 ± 16.99% across tetraplegics. Except for one tetraplegic, all participants met the safety requirements. With 88 ± 11% of the maximum achievable score, tetraplegics rated the control paradigm as user-friendly and reliable. These results suggest that hybrid EEG/EOG B/NHE control of two assistive devices is feasible and safe, paving the way to test this paradigm in larger clinical trials performing bimanual tasks in everyday life environments.
Copyright © 2020 Nann, Peekhaus, Angerhöfer and Soekadar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCI; EEG; EOG; bilateral exoskeleton control; bimanual tasks; brain-computer interface; brain-machine (computer) interface

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362490      PMCID: PMC7756108          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.580105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  55 in total

Review 1.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update.

Authors:  F Lotte; L Bougrain; A Cichocki; M Clerc; M Congedo; A Rakotomamonjy; F Yger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Functional Priorities in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Using Discrete Choice Experiments To Determine Preferences.

Authors:  Charles Lo; Yvonne Tran; Kim Anderson; Ashley Craig; James Middleton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  The advantages of the surface Laplacian in brain-computer interface research.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Brian Wodlinger; John E Downey; Wei Wang; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Douglas J Weber; Angus J C McMorland; Meel Velliste; Michael L Boninger; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The hybrid BCI.

Authors:  Gert Pfurtscheller; Brendan Z Allison; Clemens Brunner; Gunther Bauernfeind; Teodoro Solis-Escalante; Reinhold Scherer; Thorsten O Zander; Gernot Mueller-Putz; Christa Neuper; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm.

Authors:  Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Enhancing brain-machine interface (BMI) control of a hand exoskeleton using electrooculography (EOG).

Authors:  Matthias Witkowski; Mario Cortese; Marco Cempini; Jürgen Mellinger; Nicola Vitiello; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration.

Authors:  A Bolu Ajiboye; Francis R Willett; Daniel R Young; William D Memberg; Brian A Murphy; Jonathan P Miller; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Harry A Hoyen; Michael W Keith; P Hunter Peckham; John D Simeral; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients.

Authors:  Ana R C Donati; Solaiman Shokur; Edgard Morya; Debora S F Campos; Renan C Moioli; Claudia M Gitti; Patricia B Augusto; Sandra Tripodi; Cristhiane G Pires; Gislaine A Pereira; Fabricio L Brasil; Simone Gallo; Anthony A Lin; Angelo K Takigami; Maria A Aratanha; Sanjay Joshi; Hannes Bleuler; Gordon Cheng; Alan Rudolph; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Development of 3D-printed myoelectric hand orthosis for patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hyun-Joon Yoo; Sangbaek Lee; Jongheon Kim; Chanki Park; Boreom Lee
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.