Literature DB >> 33362489

Cognitive Outcomes for Essential Tremor Patients Selected for Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Through Interdisciplinary Evaluations.

Jacob D Jones1, Tatiana Orozco2, Dawn Bowers2, Wei Hu2, Zakia Jabarkheel2, Shannon Chiu2, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora2, Kelly Foote3, Michael S Okun2, Aparna Wagle Shukla2.   

Abstract

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeted to the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus is effective for motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET), but there is limited data on cognitive outcomes. We examined cognitive outcomes in a large cohort of ET DBS patients (pre-DBS and 1+ year after DBS).
Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we used repeated-measures ANOVA testing to examine whether the age of tremor onset, age at DBS surgery, hemisphere side implanted with lead, unilateral vs. bilateral implantations, and presence of surgical complications influenced the cognitive outcomes. Neuropsychological outcomes of interest were verbal memory, executive functioning, working memory, language functioning, visuospatial functioning, and general cognitive function.
Results: We identified 50 ET DBS patients; 29 (58%) males; the mean age of tremor onset was 35.84 (±21.50) years with a median age of 38 years. The mean age at DBS was 68.18 (±10.07) years. There were 37 unilateral 30 left, seven right, and 13 bilateral brain implantations. In the subgroup analysis, there was a significant interaction between assessment (pre vs. post) and age of tremor onset (<38 vs. >38 years); F (1,30) = 4.47; p = 0.043 for working memory. The post hoc testing found improvements for younger onset ET. Similarly, there was a significant interaction between assessment (pre vs. post) and complications vs. no complications subgroups; F (1,45) = 4.34; p = 0.043 for verbal memory with worsening scores seen for ET patients with complications. The remaining tests were not significant.
Conclusion: In this large cohort of ET patients with (>30% improvements), DBS was not accompanied by a significant decline in many cognitive domains. These outcomes were possibly related to the selection of patients with normal cognitive functioning before surgery, unilateral DBS implantations for the majority, and selection of patients with optimal response to DBS.
Copyright © 2020 Jones, Orozco, Bowers, Hu, Jabarkheel, Chiu, Ramirez-Zamora, Foote, Okun and Wagle Shukla.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DBS (deep brain stimulation); cognitive; essential tremor; neuropsychology; working memory

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362489      PMCID: PMC7759538          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  27 in total

1.  Neuropsychological deficits in essential tremor: an expression of cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathophysiology?

Authors:  A I Tröster; S P Woods; J A Fields; K E Lyons; R Pahwa; C I Higginson; W C Koller
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.089

2.  Cognitive deficits in patients with essential tremor.

Authors:  Drake D Duane; Kendall J Vermilion
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: surgical issues.

Authors:  Ali R Rezai; Brian H Kopell; Robert E Gross; Jerrold L Vitek; Ashwini D Sharan; Patricia Limousin; Alim-Louis Benabid
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Effects of deep brain stimulation in the caudal zona incerta on verbal fluency.

Authors:  Anders Fytagoridis; Rickard L Sjöberg; Mattias Åström; Anna Fredricks; Lars Nyberg; Patric Blomstedt
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Mammillothalamic tracts and representational memory.

Authors:  G J Thomas; D M Gash
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Deep-brain stimulation: long-term analysis of complications caused by hardware and surgery--experiences from a single centre.

Authors:  J Voges; Y Waerzeggers; M Maarouf; R Lehrke; A Koulousakis; D Lenartz; V Sturm
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor in elderly patients.

Authors:  Johann Klein; Lars Büntjen; Gerrit Jacobi; Imke Galazky; Patricia Panther; Tino Zaehle; Jörn Kaufmann; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jürgen Voges; Andreas Kupsch
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Neuropsychological and quality of life outcome after thalamic stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  A I Tröster; J A Fields; R Pahwa; S B Wilkinson; K A Strait-Tröster; K Lyons; J Kieltyka; W C Koller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Effects of thalamic deep brain stimulation on spontaneous language production.

Authors:  Felicitas Ehlen; Isabelle Vonberg; Andrea A Kühn; Fabian Klostermann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Cognitive deficits in essential tremor consistent with frontosubcortical dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher I Higginson; Vicki L Wheelock; Dawn Levine; David S King; Conrad T E Pappas; Karen A Sigvardt
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neuropsychological outcomes after thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  Kaltra Dhima; Julia Biars; Efstathios Kondylis; Sean Nagel; Xin Xin Yu; Darlene P Floden
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.