Literature DB >> 33362421

Heterogeneous node responses to multi-type epidemics on networks.

S Moore1, T Rogers1.   

Abstract

Having knowledge of the contact network over which an infection is spreading opens the possibility of making individualized predictions for the likelihood of different nodes to become infected. When multiple infective strains attempt to spread simultaneously we may further ask which strain, or strains, are most likely to infect a particular node. In this article we investigate the heterogeneity in likely outcomes for different nodes in two models of multi-type epidemic spreading processes. For models allowing co-infection we derive message-passing equations whose solution captures how the likelihood of a given node receiving a particular infection depends on both the position of the node in the network and the interaction between the infection types. For models of competing epidemics in which co-infection is impossible, a more complicated analysis leads to the simpler result that node vulnerability factorizes into a contribution from the network topology and a contribution from the infection parameters.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  complex contagions; epidemics; networks

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362421      PMCID: PMC7735291          DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-5021            Impact factor:   2.704


  18 in total

1.  A status-based approach to multiple strain dynamics.

Authors:  J R Gog; J Swinton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Message passing approach for general epidemic models.

Authors:  Brian Karrer; M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-07-02

3.  When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology.

Authors:  Shweta Bansal; Bryan T Grenfell; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Spectral redemption in clustering sparse networks.

Authors:  Florent Krzakala; Cristopher Moore; Elchanan Mossel; Joe Neeman; Allan Sly; Lenka Zdeborová; Pan Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Localization and centrality in networks.

Authors:  Travis Martin; Xiao Zhang; M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-11-12

6.  Tight lower bound for percolation threshold on an infinite graph.

Authors:  Kathleen E Hamilton; Leonid P Pryadko
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Percolation transition in dynamical traffic network with evolving critical bottlenecks.

Authors:  Daqing Li; Bowen Fu; Yunpeng Wang; Guangquan Lu; Yehiel Berezin; H Eugene Stanley; Shlomo Havlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Viruses and bacteria in the etiology of the common cold.

Authors:  M J Mäkelä; T Puhakka; O Ruuskanen; M Leinonen; P Saikku; M Kimpimäki; S Blomqvist; T Hyypiä; P Arstila
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.

Authors:  Siddharth Suri; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence.

Authors:  J O Lloyd-Smith; S J Schreiber; P E Kopp; W M Getz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.