Literature DB >> 33362312

Furloughing.

Abi Adams-Prassl1, Teodora Boneva2, Marta Golin1, Christopher Rauh3.   

Abstract

Over nine million jobs were furloughed in the United Kingdom during the coronavirus pandemic. Using real-time survey evidence from the UK in April and May 2020, we document which workers were most likely to be furloughed and we analyse variation in the terms on which they furloughed. We find that women were significantly more likely to be furloughed. Inequality in care responsibilities seems to have played a key role: mothers were 10 percentage points more likely than fathers to initiate the decision to be furloughed (as opposed to it being fully or mostly the employer's decision) but we find no such gender gap amongst childless workers. The prohibition of working whilst furloughed was routinely ignored, especially by men who can do a large percentage of their work tasks from home. Women were less likely to have their salary topped up beyond the 80 per cent subsidy paid for by the government. Considering the future, furloughed workers without employer-provided sick pay have a lower willingness to pay to return to work, as do those in sales and food preparation occupations. Compared with non-furloughed employees, furloughed workers are more pessimistic about keeping their job in the short to medium run and are more likely to be actively searching for a new job, even when controlling for detailed job characteristics. These results have important implications for the design of short-time work schemes and the strategy for effectively reopening the economy.
© 2020 The Authors. Fiscal Studies published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID‐19; coronavirus; crisis; furlough; inequality; recession; short‐time work

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362312      PMCID: PMC7753414          DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fisc Stud        ISSN: 0143-5671


  5 in total

1.  Working from home and the explosion of enduring divides: income, employment and safety risks.

Authors:  A Cetrulo; D Guarascio; M E Virgillito
Journal:  Econ Polit (Bologna)       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and diet, physical activity, and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from eight longitudinal population surveys.

Authors:  Bożena Wielgoszewska; Jane Maddock; Michael J Green; Giorgio Di Gessa; Sam Parsons; Gareth J Griffith; Jazz Croft; Anna J Stevenson; Charlotte Booth; Richard J Silverwood; David Bann; Praveetha Patalay; Alun D Hughes; Nishi Chaturvedi; Laura D Howe; Emla Fitzsimons; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; George B Ploubidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 11.150

3.  A shift in women's health? Older workers' self-reported health and employment settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jacques Wels; Natasia Hamarat
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Charlotte Booth; Bożena Wielgoszewska; Michael J Green; Giorgio Di Gessa; Charlotte F Huggins; Gareth J Griffith; Alex S F Kwong; Ruth C E Bowyer; Jane Maddock; Praveetha Patalay; Richard J Silverwood; Emla Fitzsimons; Richard Shaw; Ellen J Thompson; Andrew Steptoe; Alun Hughes; Nishi Chaturvedi; Claire J Steves; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; George B Ploubidis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Examining harmful impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and school closures on parents and carers in the United Kingdom: A rapid review.

Authors:  Hope Christie; Lucy V Hiscox; Sarah L Halligan; Cathy Creswell
Journal:  JCPP Adv       Date:  2022-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.