Literature DB >> 33362257

Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning.

Irene González-Molina1, Blanca Jiménez-García1,2, José-Manuel Maíllo-Fernández1,3, Enrique Baquedano1,4, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo1.   

Abstract

In this paper, we apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to study the differences between Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods. For this purpose, we have used experimentally knapped flint flakes, measuring several parameters that have been analyzed by seven ML algorithms. From these analyses, it has been possible to demonstrate the existence of statistically significant differences between Discoid products and Centripetal Levallois products, thus contributing with new data and a new method to this traditional debate. The new approach enabled differentiating the blanks created by both knapping methods with an accuracy >80% using only ten typometric variables. The most relevant variables were maximum length, width to the 25%, 50% and 75% of the flake length, external and internal platform angles, maximum width and number of dorsal scars. This study also demonstrates the advantages of the application of multivariate ML methods to lithic studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362257      PMCID: PMC7757815          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

Review 1.  The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior.

Authors:  S Mcbrearty; A S Brooks
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  Assessing Neanderthal land use and lithic raw material management in Discoid technology.

Authors:  Davide Delpiano; Kristen Heasley; Marco Peresani
Journal:  J Anthropol Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

3.  Hominin skeletal part abundances and claims of deliberate disposal of corpses in the Middle Pleistocene.

Authors:  Charles P Egeland; Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; Travis Rayne Pickering; Colin G Menter; Jason L Heaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental 'preferential' Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes.

Authors:  Metin I Eren; Stephen J Lycett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distinguishing butchery cut marks from crocodile bite marks through machine learning methods.

Authors:  Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo; Enrique Baquedano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills.

Authors:  Antoine Muller; Ceri Shipton; Chris Clarkson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Artifact3-D: New software for accurate, objective and efficient 3D analysis and documentation of archaeological artifacts.

Authors:  Leore Grosman; Antoine Muller; Itamar Dag; Hadas Goldgeier; Ortal Harush; Gadi Herzlinger; Keren Nebenhaus; Francesco Valetta; Talia Yashuv; Nir Dick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.