| Literature DB >> 33361824 |
Saskia Trump1, Soeren Lukassen2, Markus S Anker3,4,5,6, Robert Lorenz Chua2, Johannes Liebig2, Loreen Thürmann1, Victor Max Corman7, Marco Binder8, Jennifer Loske1, Christina Klasa9, Teresa Krieger2, Bianca P Hennig2, Marey Messingschlager1, Fabian Pott7,10, Julia Kazmierski7,10, Sven Twardziok2, Jan Philipp Albrecht2, Jürgen Eils2, Sara Hadzibegovic3,4,5,6, Alessia Lena3,4,5,6, Bettina Heidecker3, Thore Bürgel2, Jakob Steinfeldt3, Christine Goffinet7,10, Florian Kurth11,12, Martin Witzenrath11, Maria Theresa Völker13, Sarah Dorothea Müller13, Uwe Gerd Liebert14, Naveed Ishaque2, Lars Kaderali9, Leif-Erik Sander11, Christian Drosten7, Sven Laudi15, Roland Eils16,17,18, Christian Conrad19, Ulf Landmesser20, Irina Lehmann21,22.
Abstract
In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), hypertension and cardiovascular diseases are major risk factors for critical disease progression. However, the underlying causes and the effects of the main anti-hypertensive therapies-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)-remain unclear. Combining clinical data (n = 144) and single-cell sequencing data of airway samples (n = 48) with in vitro experiments, we observed a distinct inflammatory predisposition of immune cells in patients with hypertension that correlated with critical COVID-19 progression. ACEI treatment was associated with dampened COVID-19-related hyperinflammation and with increased cell intrinsic antiviral responses, whereas ARB treatment related to enhanced epithelial-immune cell interactions. Macrophages and neutrophils of patients with hypertension, in particular under ARB treatment, exhibited higher expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines CCL3 and CCL4 and the chemokine receptor CCR1. Although the limited size of our cohort does not allow us to establish clinical efficacy, our data suggest that the clinical benefits of ACEI treatment in patients with COVID-19 who have hypertension warrant further investigation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33361824 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-00796-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biotechnol ISSN: 1087-0156 Impact factor: 54.908