Literature DB >> 33361253

Increasing Out-of-Pocket Costs for Neurologic Care for Privately Insured Patients.

Chloe E Hill1, Evan L Reynolds2, James F Burke2, Mousumi Banerjee2, Kevin A Kerber2, Brandon Magliocco2, Gregory J Esper2, Lesli E Skolarus2, Brian C Callaghan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of evaluation and management (E/M) services and common diagnostic testing for neurology patients.
METHODS: Using a large, privately insured health care claims database, we identified patients with a neurologic visit or diagnostic test from 2001 to 2016 and assessed inflation-adjusted OOP costs for E/M visits, neuroimaging, and neurophysiologic testing. For each diagnostic service each year, we estimated the proportion of patients with OOP costs, the mean OOP cost, and the proportion of the total service cost paid OOP. We modeled OOP cost as a function of patient and insurance factors.
RESULTS: We identified 3,724,342 patients. The most frequent neurologic services were E/M visits (78.5%), EMG/nerve conduction studies (NCS) (7.7%), MRIs (5.3%), and EEGs (4.5%). Annually, 86.5%-95.2% of patients paid OOP costs for E/M visits and 23.1%-69.5% for diagnostic tests. For patients paying any OOP cost, the mean OOP cost increased over time, most substantially for EEG, MRI, and E/M. OOP costs varied considerably; for an MRI in 2016, the 50th percentile paid $103.10 and the 95th percentile paid $875.40. The proportion of total service cost paid OOP increased. High deductible health plan (HDHP) enrollment was associated with higher OOP costs for MRI, EMG/NCS, and EEG.
CONCLUSION: An increasing number of patients pay OOP for neurologic diagnostic services. These costs are rising and vary greatly across patients and tests. The cost sharing burden is particularly high for the growing population with HDHPs. In this setting, neurologic evaluation might result in financial hardship for patients.
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33361253      PMCID: PMC7884984          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  19 in total

1.  Medicare payments to the neurology workforce in 2012.

Authors:  Lesli E Skolarus; James F Burke; Brian C Callaghan; Amanda Becker; Kevin A Kerber
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Adjusting Health Expenditures for Inflation: A Review of Measures for Health Services Research in the United States.

Authors:  Abe Dunn; Scott D Grosse; Samuel H Zuvekas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  More Americans gain health coverage, but their cost-sharing keeps rising.

Authors:  Bob Herman
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  2016-09

4.  The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, three decades later.

Authors:  Aviva Aron-Dine; Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2013

5.  High-Deductible Health Plans Reduce Health Care Cost And Utilization, Including Use Of Needed Preventive Services.

Authors:  Rajender Agarwal; Olena Mazurenko; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Cost-Sharing Obligations, High-Deductible Health Plan Growth, and Shopping for Health Care: Enrollees With Skin in the Game.

Authors:  Anna D Sinaiko; Ateev Mehrotra; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Healthcare spending and preventive care in high-deductible and consumer-directed health plans.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Amelia M Haviland; Roland McDevitt; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Choosing Wisely: highest-cost tests in outpatient neurology.

Authors:  James F Burke; Lesli E Skolarus; Brian C Callaghan; Kevin A Kerber
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Out-of-Pocket Spending and Financial Burden Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.

Authors:  Amol K Narang; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Assessment of Accuracy and Usability of a Fee Estimator for Ambulatory Care in an Integrated Health Care Delivery Network.

Authors:  Cheryl D Stults; Jiang Li; Dominick L Frosch; Hari Krishnan; Gregg Smith-McCurdy; Veena G Jones; Albert S Chan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.