Literature DB >> 3336108

Stage A versus stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate: morphological comparison and biological significance.

J E McNeal1, H M Price, E A Redwine, F S Freiha, T A Stamey.   

Abstract

Morphological features in radical prostatectomy specimens from 11 stage A and 73 stage B prostatic carcinomas were compared by mapping of tumor locations, and determinations of cancer volumes and histological patterns. Small stage A cancers were located anteromedially, while small stage B carcinomas were concentrated against the posterior capsule at the rectal surface. Small stage A carcinomas commonly invaded the anterior fibromuscular stroma and benign prostatic hyperplasia nodules, features that were uncommon even in large stage B tumors. Stage A cancers often appeared to arise within benign prostatic hyperplasia nodules and had a distinctive histological appearance. Even when large, stage A carcinomas tended not to spread close to the rectal surface of the gland. Stages A and B cancers spanned a roughly comparable volume range, and both showed progressive dedifferentiation with increasing volume. It is proposed that stages A and B cancers are biologically similar malignancies, distinguished only by their site of origin. Prognosis for patients with stage A carcinoma probably is closely related to tumor volume and dedifferentiation, features that are not reliably estimated in tissue samples removed at operation for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3336108     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42293-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Louisa Bokacheva; Dirk-Jan Kroon; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak; Daniel Chamudot; Samson Fine; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

3.  Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?

Authors:  M A Sutton; R P Gibbons; R J Correa
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-07

Review 4.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Connective tissue protein in the prostate gland.

Authors:  T Nakada; Y Kubota
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Total intraglandular and index tumor volumes predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Shin; Cheol Keun Park; Sung Yoon Park; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Re-evaluating the concept of "dominant/index tumor nodule" in multifocal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng Huang; Fang-Ming Deng; Max X Kong; Qinhu Ren; Jonathan Melamed; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Diagnosis, prognosis and management of incidentally found prostate cancer.

Authors:  P J Davidson
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1993-01

Review 9.  The significance of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for the development of prostate carcinoma. An update.

Authors:  B G Helpap; D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Do prostatic transition zone tumors have a distinct morphology?

Authors:  Joaquin J Garcia; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Anuradha Gopalan; Satish K Tickoo; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.