Literature DB >> 33360649

Improving Quantification of tabun, sarin, soman, cyclosarin, and sulfur mustard by focusing agents: A field portable gas chromatography-mass spectrometry study.

John T Kelly1, Anthony Qualley2, Geoffrey T Hughes2, Mitchell H Rubenstein3, Thomas A Malloy4, Tedeusz Piatkowski4.   

Abstract

Commercial gas chromatograph-mass spectrometers, one of which being Inficon's HAPSITE® ER, have demonstrated chemical detection and identification of nerve agents (G-series) and blistering agents (mustard gas) in the field; however most analyses relies on self-contained or external calibration that inherently drifts over time. We describe an analytical approach that uses target-based thermal desorption standards, called focusing agents, to accurately calculate concentrations of chemical warfare agents that are analyzed by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Here, we provide relative response factors of focusing agents (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, diisopropyl fluorophosphate, diethyl methylphosphonate, diethyl malonate, methyl salicylate, and dichlorvos) that are used to quantify concentrations of tabun, sarin, soman, cyclosarin and sulfur mustard loaded on thermal desorption tubes (Tenax® TA). Aging effects of focusing agents are evaluated by monitoring deviations in quantification as thermal desorption tubes age in storage at room temperature and relative humidity. The addition of focusing agents improves the quantification of tabun, sarin, soman, cyclosarin and sulfur mustard that is analyzed within the same day as well as a 14-day period. Among the six focusing agents studied here, diisopropyl fluorophosphate has the best performance for nerve agents (G-series) and blistering agents (mustard gas) compared to other focusing agents in this work and is recommended for field use for quantification. The use of focusing agent in the field leads to more accurate and reliable quantification of Tabun (GA), Sarin (GB), Soman (GD), Cyclosarin (GF) and Sulfur Mustard (HD) than the traditional internal standard. Future improvements on the detection of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive materials (CBRNE) can be safely demonstrated with standards calibrated for harmful agents.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33360649     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  2 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic Wave Sensors for Detection of Blister Chemical Warfare Agents and Their Simulants.

Authors:  Michał Grabka; Zygfryd Witkiewicz; Krzysztof Jasek; Krzysztof Piwowarski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Fluorophenol-Containing Hydrogen-Bond Acidic Polysiloxane for Gas Sensing-Synthesis and Characterization.

Authors:  Michał Grabka; Przemysław Kula; Mateusz Szala; Krzysztof Jasek; Michał Czerwiński
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 4.329

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.