Victoria Fruh1, Birgit Claus Henn2, Jennifer Weuve3, Amelia K Wesselink3, Olivia R Orta3, Timothy Heeren4, Russ Hauser5, Antonia M Calafat6, Paige L Williams7, Donna D Baird8, Lauren A Wise3. 1. Department of Environmental Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: vfru1212@bu.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Department of Epidemiology, 715 Albany Street, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 4. Department of Biostatistics, 715 Albany Street, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 5. Department of Environmental Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, United States. 7. Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 677 Huntington Avenue, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 8. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 TW Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that some phthalates have adverse reproductive effects. However, literature on the association between phthalates and incidence of uterine leiomyomata (UL) is limited and inconsistent, with no existing prospective studies. OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of urinary concentrations of phthalate and phthalate alternative biomarkers with UL incidence. METHODS: We conducted a case-cohort analysis within a subgroup of 754 participants in the Study of the Environment, Lifestyle, and Fibroids (SELF), a prospective cohort of premenopausal Black women aged 23-35 years who were recruited during 2010-2012. We quantified fourteen phthalates and two phthalate alternative [1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH)] biomarkers in urine collected at baseline, 20 months, and 40 months. Transvaginal ultrasounds identified UL at baseline and every 20 months during 60 months of follow-up. We evaluated the individual biomarkers, molar sum of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [ΣDEHP] and potency-weighted sum of anti-androgenic [WΣAA] biomarkers. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between biomarkers and UL incidence. We then used quantile g-computation to examine joint associations of multiple phthalate biomarkers with UL incidence. RESULTS: Most individual biomarkers showed weak-to-moderate inverse associations with UL incidence. HRs comparing highest vs. lowest quartiles of mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) and mono-hydroxyisobutyl phthalate (MHiBP) concentrations were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.40, 1.01) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.96), respectively. Inverse associations for specific phthalates were stronger among women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. HRs comparing detectable vs. nondetectable concentrations of DINCH biomarkers were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.35) for cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxyisononyl ester (MHNCH) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38, 1.18) for cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisoocytl ester (MCOCH). For the DEHP metabolite of mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), we observed weak-to-moderate positive associations. HRs comparing highest vs. lowest quartiles for MEHP and ΣDEHP were 1.29 (95% CI: 0.82, 2.06) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.50), respectively. In the mixtures analysis, the HR for a joint quartile increase in phthalate biomarker concentrations was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.08). DISCUSSION: In this prospective ultrasound study of reproductive-aged Black women, urinary concentrations of phthalate and DINCH biomarkers were not appreciably associated with higher risk of UL, either individually or jointly.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that some phthalates have adverse reproductive effects. However, literature on the association between phthalates and incidence of uterine leiomyomata (UL) is limited and inconsistent, with no existing prospective studies. OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of urinary concentrations of phthalate and phthalate alternative biomarkers with UL incidence. METHODS: We conducted a case-cohort analysis within a subgroup of 754 participants in the Study of the Environment, Lifestyle, and Fibroids (SELF), a prospective cohort of premenopausal Black women aged 23-35 years who were recruited during 2010-2012. We quantified fourteen phthalates and two phthalate alternative [1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH)] biomarkers in urine collected at baseline, 20 months, and 40 months. Transvaginal ultrasounds identified UL at baseline and every 20 months during 60 months of follow-up. We evaluated the individual biomarkers, molar sum of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [ΣDEHP] and potency-weighted sum of anti-androgenic [WΣAA] biomarkers. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between biomarkers and UL incidence. We then used quantile g-computation to examine joint associations of multiple phthalate biomarkers with UL incidence. RESULTS: Most individual biomarkers showed weak-to-moderate inverse associations with UL incidence. HRs comparing highest vs. lowest quartiles of mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) and mono-hydroxyisobutyl phthalate (MHiBP) concentrations were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.40, 1.01) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.96), respectively. Inverse associations for specific phthalates were stronger among women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. HRs comparing detectable vs. nondetectable concentrations of DINCH biomarkers were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.35) for cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxyisononyl ester (MHNCH) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38, 1.18) for cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisoocytl ester (MCOCH). For the DEHP metabolite of mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), we observed weak-to-moderate positive associations. HRs comparing highest vs. lowest quartiles for MEHP and ΣDEHP were 1.29 (95% CI: 0.82, 2.06) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.50), respectively. In the mixtures analysis, the HR for a joint quartile increase in phthalate biomarker concentrations was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.08). DISCUSSION: In this prospective ultrasound study of reproductive-aged Black women, urinary concentrations of phthalate and DINCH biomarkers were not appreciably associated with higher risk of UL, either individually or jointly.
Authors: Theodore M Brasky; Traci N Bethea; Amelia K Wesselink; Ganesa R Wegienka; Donna D Baird; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jing Sun; Mei-Ru Zhang; Li-Qian Zhang; Dong Zhao; Shu-Guang Li; Bo Chen Journal: Int J Environ Health Res Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Heba M Eltoukhi; Monica N Modi; Meredith Weston; Alicia Y Armstrong; Elizabeth A Stewart Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-08-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Annekatrin Lukanova; Eva Lundin; Andrea Micheli; Alan Arslan; Pietro Ferrari; Sabina Rinaldi; Vittorio Krogh; Per Lenner; Roy E Shore; Carine Biessy; Paola Muti; Elio Riboli; Karen L Koenig; Mortimer Levitz; Pär Stattin; Franco Berrino; Göran Hallmans; Rudolf Kaaks; Paolo Toniolo; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2004-01-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Samantha Schildroth; Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Traci N Bethea; Victoria Fruh; Kyla W Taylor; Antonia M Calafat; Donna D Baird; Birgit Claus Henn Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 8.943
Authors: Diana C Pacyga; Brad A Ryva; Romana A Nowak; Serdar E Bulun; Ping Yin; Zhong Li; Jodi A Flaws; Rita S Strakovsky Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-26 Impact factor: 3.390