Literature DB >> 33359876

Fixation beats: A novel marker for reaching the left bundle branch area during deep septal lead implantation.

Marek Jastrzębski1, Grzegorz Kiełbasa2, Paweł Moskal2, Agnieszka Bednarek2, Aleksander Kusiak2, Tomasz Sondej2, Adam Bednarski2, Marek Rajzer2, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges of left bundle branch (LBB) pacing is placing the pacing lead deep enough in the septum to reach the LBB area, yet not too deep to avoid perforation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the occurrence of the ectopic beats with qR/rsR' morphology in lead V1 (fixation beats) during lead fixation would predict whether the desired intraseptal lead depth had been reached, whereas the lack of fixation beats would indicate a too-shallow position and the need for more lead rotations.
METHODS: Consecutive patients during LBB pacing device implantation were analyzed retrospectively and then prospectively with respect to the occurrence of fixation beats during each episode of lead rotation. We compared the presence of fixation beats during the lead rotation event directly before the LBB area depth was reached vs during the events before intermediate/unsuccessful positions.
RESULTS: A total of 339 patients and 1278 lead rotation events were analyzed. In the retrospective phase, fixation beats were observed in 327 of 339 final lead positions and in 9 of 939 intermediate lead positions (P <.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the fixation beats as a marker for reaching the LBB area were 96.4%, 97.3%, 97.3%, and 96.5%, respectively. In the prospective, fixation beats-guided implantation phase, fixation beats were observed in all patients and only at the LBB capture depth.
CONCLUSION: Monitoring fixation beats during deep septal lead deployment can facilitate the procedure and possibly increase the safety of lead implantation.
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conduction system pacing; Deep septal lead implantation; Fixation ventricular premature beats; Left bundle branch pacing; Pacemaker implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33359876     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  6 in total

1.  Premature beat of selective left bundle branch: a novel marker for reaching and capturing the left bundle branch.

Authors:  Jiabo Shen; Longfu Jiang; Fei Jiang; Hao Wu; Xiaojie Cai; Shanshan Zhuo; Lifang Pan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  A single-centre prospective evaluation of left bundle branch area pacemaker implantation characteristics.

Authors:  L I B Heckman; J G L M Luermans; M Jastrzębski; B Weijs; A M W Van Stipdonk; S Westra; D den Uijl; D Linz; M Mafi-Rad; F W Prinzen; K Vernooy
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.854

3.  Which Is More Likely to Achieve Cardiac Synchronization: Left Bundle Branch Pacing or Left Ventricular Septal Pacing?

Authors:  Kailun Zhu; Dong Chang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Comparison with Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients with High Ventricular Pacing Ratio ≥40.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Wenbin Li; Xiaolin Zhou; Haobo Huang; Lei Wang; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-19

5.  Consecutive Narrower Fixation Beats as a Marker of Lead Advancement into the Septum During Left Bundle Branch Pacing.

Authors:  Catalin Pestrea; Ecaterina Cicala; Alexandra Gherghina; Florin Ortan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Wenbin Li; Lei Wang; Shaohua Tian; Xiaolin Zhou; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.