| Literature DB >> 33359239 |
Sonoko Ishida1, Masayuki Akita2, Kohei Fujikura3, Masato Komatsu3, Ryuichiro Sawada1, Hisayuki Matsumoto4, Jun Saegusa4, Tomoo Itoh3, Yoshihiro Kakeji5, Yoh Zen6.
Abstract
The gene mutation profiles of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize the molecular pathology of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine‒non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) of the stomach. Surgical cases of gastric NEC (n = 7) and MiNEN (n = 6) were examined by clinical review, immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis and whole-exome sequencing. NEC cases consisted of small- (n = 2) and large-cell types (n = 4). All cases of MiNEN were histologically composed of large-cell type NEC and tubular adenocarcinoma. Whole-exome sequencing analysis detected recurrent mutations in TP53 in 8 cases (62%), and they were more frequently observed in MiNEN than in NEC (100% vs. 29%). Frameshift mutations of APC were observed in two cases of MiNEN. One case of large-cell type NEC had a frameshift mutation with loss of heterozygosity in RB1. The other mutated genes (e.g., ARID1 and KRAS) were detected in a single case each. A high level of MSI was confirmed in one case of MiNEN, which harbored mutations in two well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET)-related genes (MEN1 and ATRX1). In cases of MiNEN, two histological components shared mutations in TP53, APC and ZNF521, whereas alterations in CTNNB1, KMT2C, PTEN and SPEN were observed in neuroendocrine components only. In conclusion, TP53 is a single, frequently mutated gene in gastric NEC and MiNEN, and alterations in other genes are less common, resembling the mutation profiles of gastric adenocarcinomas. Gene mutations frequently observed in well-differentiated NET were uncommon but not entirely exclusive.Entities:
Keywords: Adenoendocrine carcinoma; Gastric cancer; MEN1; Neuroendocrine; TP53
Year: 2021 PMID: 33359239 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.12.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466