Literature DB >> 33358608

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Nikhil Ailaney1, William L Johns1, Gregory J Golladay2, Benjamin Strong2, Niraj V Kalore2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) increases the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) decreases infections in traumatic wounds, but evidence for its use after elective TJA is limited. The purpose of this meta-analysis of level I studies is to determine the effect of ciNPWT on risk of SSI and wound complications following TJA.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing ciNPWT vs standard dressings after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Studies exclusively involving THA for femoral neck fractures were excluded. Risk of SSI and noninfectious wound complications (blisters, seroma, hematoma, persistent drainage, dehiscence, and wound edge necrosis) following TJA were analyzed.
RESULTS: SSI risk was lower with ciNPWT compared to standard dressings (3.4% vs 7%; relative risk [RR] 0.48, P = .007), specifically in revision THA and TKA (4.1% vs 10.5%; RR 0.41, P = .03). ciNPWT increased the noninfectious complication risk after primary TKA (RR 4.71, P < .0001), especially causing wound blistering (RR 12.66, P < .0001). ciNPWT decreased hospital length of stay by 0.73 days (P = .04) and reoperation rate (RR 0.28, P = .01).
CONCLUSION: ciNPWT decreases SSI risk compared to standard dressings after revision TJA, but not primary TJA. ciNPWT is associated with >12-fold increased risk of wound blistering after primary TKA. ciNPWT plays a role in revision TJA management, but additional randomized controlled trials with uniform wound assessment methods must be performed to sufficiently power findings and draw conclusions on the use of ciNPWT after primary TJA.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closed incision negative pressure wound therapy; surgical site infection; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; wound complication

Year:  2020        PMID: 33358608     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  The application of close incisional negative pressure wound therapy in revision arthroplasty among asian patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ping Keung Chan; Wing Chiu Fung; Kar Hei Lam; Winnie Chan; Vincent Wai Kwan Chan; Henry Fu; Amy Cheung; Man Hong Cheung; Chun Hoi Yan; Kwong Yuen Chiu
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional wound dressings for closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiwei Xie; Lingyan Dai; Yameng Qi; Xixi Jiang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Effect of Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Donor Site Morbidity in Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.

Authors:  Songsu Kang; Seiko Okumura; Yoko Maruyama; Ikuo Hyodo; Ryota Nakamura; Saya Kobayashi; Maho Kato; Keisuke Takanari
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 4.  The use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management: Expert panel consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Ronald P Silverman; John Apostolides; Abhishek Chatterjee; Anthony N Dardano; Regina M Fearmonti; Allen Gabriel; Robert T Grant; Owen N Johnson; Suresh Koneru; Anna A Kuang; Andrea A Moreira; Steven R Sigalove
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.