Literature DB >> 33358236

Implications and characteristics of high bleeding risk in East Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Start with what is right rather than what is acceptable.

Masato Nakamura1, Raisuke Iijima2.   

Abstract

Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology and medication have changed the main focus of PCI from preventing ischemic to preventing bleeding events. Bleeding risk assessment is essential for preventing bleeding. Several types of assessment tools have been established, but they are heterogeneous, making interpretation, generalization, and comparison between trials difficult. In 2019, the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) introduced a new consensus document with 20 criteria to define high bleeding risk (HBR). The applicability of the ARCHBR criteria were subsequently investigated, and 4 studies have already demonstrated wide applicability worldwide, including in Japan. Nevertheless, it hase been suggested that bleeding risk is higher in people from East Asian countries than in people from Western countries. Patients with HBR have a 3-fold higher risk of major bleeding, and in Japan approximately 50% of patients undergoing PCI have HBR. In addition, patients with overlapping factors, such as older age, renal disease, and anemia, are at increased risk of bleeding, and each additional factor further increases the risk. In Japanese patients undergoing PCI, in addition to the ARC-HBR criteria, low body weight, heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease are high-risk subsets for bleeding. The addition of these factors to the ARCHBR criteria increases the prevalence of HBR in Japanese patients to 58% and improves the sensitivity of diagnostic evaluations. The additional factors are clinically important because they are often encountered in everyday practice, and Japan's newly updated guideline has adopted them as criteria for HBR. Studies found a temporal trend over the past 20 years of a gradual and consistent increase of bleeding risk. This finding contrasts with improved outcomes in people at risk of ischemic and thrombotic events. Therefore, further research is needed to eliminate the risk of bleeding while maintaining the efficacy of antithrombotic therapy after PCI.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic research consortium; East asian paradox; High bleeding risk; Japanese registry; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2020        PMID: 33358236     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria associated with 2-year bleeding events and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement discharge: a Japanese Multicentre Prospective OCEAN-TAVI Registry Study.

Authors:  Kazuki Mizutani; Gaku Nakazawa; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Mana Ogawa; Tsukasa Okai; Fumiaki Yashima; Toru Naganuma; Futoshi Yamanaka; Norio Tada; Kensuke Takagi; Masahiro Yamawaki; Hiroshi Ueno; Minoru Tabata; Shinichi Shirai; Yusuke Watanabe; Masanori Yamamoto; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-11-15

2.  Validation of Japanese Bleeding Risk Criteria in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Comparison With Contemporary Bleeding Risk Criteria.

Authors:  Takeshi Shimizu; Yuya Sakuma; Yuta Kurosawa; Yuuki Muto; Akihiko Sato; Satoshi Abe; Tomofumi Misaka; Masayoshi Oikawa; Akiomi Yoshihisa; Takayoshi Yamaki; Kazuhiko Nakazato; Takafumi Ishida; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.