Literature DB >> 33358033

The role of the state in financing and regulating primary care in Europe: a taxonomy.

Ana Belén Espinosa-González1, Brendan C Delaney2, Joachim Marti3, Ara Darzi2.   

Abstract

Traditional health systems typologies were based on health system financing type, such as the well-known OECD typology. However, the number of dimensions captured in classifications increased to reflect health systems complexity. This study aims to develop a taxonomy of primary care (PC) systems based on the actors involved (state, societal and private) and mechanisms used in governance, financing and regulation, which conceptually represents the degree of decentralisation of functions. We use nonlinear canonical correlations analysis and agglomerative hierarchical clustering on data obtained from the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policy and informants from 24 WHO European Region countries. We obtain four clusters: 1) Bosnia Herzegovina, Czech Republic, Germany, Slovakia and Switzerland: corporatist and/or fragmented PC system, with state involvement in PC supply regulation, without gatekeeping; 2) Greece, Ireland, Israel, Malta, Sweden, and Ukraine: public and (re)centralised PC financing and regulation with private involvement, without gatekeeping; 3) Finland, Norway, Spain and United Kingdom: public financing and devolved regulation and organisation of PC, with gatekeeping; and 4) Bulgaria, Croatia, France, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia and Turkey: public and deconcentrated with professional involvement in supply regulation, and gatekeeping. This taxonomy can serve as a framework for performance comparisons and a means to analyse the effect that different actors and levels of devolution or fragmentation of PC delivery may have in health outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; actors; decentralisation; health systems; primary care; taxonomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33358033     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  4 in total

1.  Comparing public attitudes, knowledge, beliefs and behaviours towards antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in Australia, United Kingdom, and Sweden (2010-2021): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparative policy analysis.

Authors:  Olivia Hawkins; Anna Mae Scott; Amy Montgomery; Bevan Nicholas; Judy Mullan; Antoine van Oijen; Chris Degeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  COVID-19 health policy evaluation: integrating health and economic perspectives with a data envelopment analysis approach.

Authors:  Matthias Klumpp; Dominic Loske; Silvio Bicciato
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  A "Shock Test" to Primary Care Integration: COVID-19 Lessons from Alberta.

Authors:  Myles Leslie; Raad Fadaak; Nicole Pinto; Jan Davies; Lee Green; Judy Seidel; John Conly; Pierre-Gerlier Forest
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-11

Review 4.  Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Anna Nicolet; Clémence Perraudin; Joël Wagner; Ingrid Gilles; Nicolas Krucien; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux; Joachim Marti
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.