| Literature DB >> 33357677 |
Caroline Espejo Stanquevis1, Antônio Cláudio Furlan1, Simara Márcia Marcato1, Taciana Maria de Oliveira-Bruxel1, Taynara Prestes Perine1, Eline Maria Finco1, Erica Travaini Grecco1, Mariani Ireni Benites1, Vittor Tuzzi Zancanela2.
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to estimate the nutritional requirements of calcium (Ca) and available phosphorus (aP) for Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) in the egg-laying stage (64-168 D). The experiment was an entirely randomized design, in a factorial scheme (Ca = 1.70, 2.40, 3.10, and 3.80% and aP = 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, and 0.60%), with 3 replicates and 10 quails per experimental unit. No interactions were found for quail body weight and daily feed intake (DFI) (P > 0.05). However, body weight decreased linearly (P < 0.05) as the levels of Ca increased, whereas DFI exhibited a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) for both Ca and aP. The lowest values of DFI were estimated in 2.79 and 0.36% for Ca and aP, respectively. Egg production, egg mass, and feed conversion ratio per egg dozen presented significant interaction in which all of them had a quadratic effect (P < 0.05), with estimations for maximum yield in feed containing 2.74, 2.71, 2.75, and 2.74% Ca and 0.40, 0.39, 0.39, and 0.40% aP. The concentration of Ca in the eggshell increased linearly as per the levels of Ca studied, having a quadratic effect for aP levels, with a maximum point of 0.44%. In relation to the bone parameters, there was a linear interaction for Ca and aP in bone density and bone resistance (BR) of the femur, with a quadratic effect in BD estimating 2.84 and 0.50% for Ca and aP, respectively. In BR, the estimation was 3.27% Ca, with linear increase for aP. The BR of the tibiotarso increased linearly as per the Ca levels, obtaining the same Ca concentration response in this bone. As conclusion, when considering the estimations obtained through overlapped contour plots, the best responses to the effects of Ca and aP on productive characteristics were estimated at 2.68% Ca and 0.38% aP to produce feed for egg-laying Japanese quails.Entities:
Keywords: bone resistance; egg shell quality; nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33357677 PMCID: PMC7772666 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Percentage and nutritional calculate composition of the basal diet for the Japanese quail in the laying phase with levels of calcium and available phosphorus.
| Diet | Quantity (g/kg) |
|---|---|
| Corn | 545.03 |
| Soybean meal 45% | 301.24 |
| Soybean oil | 27.79 |
| Dicalcium phosphate x limestone x inert blend | 110.83 |
| Vitamin/mineral suplement | 4.00 |
| Salt | 3.25 |
| DL-Methionine | 4.03 |
| L-Lysine HCl | 2.67 |
| L-Threonine | 0.68 |
| L-Tryptophan | 0.38 |
| BHT | 0.10 |
| Calculated values | |
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) | 2.900 |
| Crude protein (%) | 18.800 |
| Lysine digestible (%) | 1.120 |
| Met.+cyst. digestible (%) | 0.900 |
| Threonine digestible (%) | 0.658 |
| Tryptophan digestible (%) | 0.230 |
| Chlorine (%) | 0.286 |
| Sodium (%) | 0.146 |
| Potassium (%) | 0.710 |
| Electrol. balance mEq/kg | 164 |
Abbreviation: BHT, butyl hydroxy toluene.
Dicalcium phosphate and limestone–diluted soft sand at the levels of 1.70, 2.40, 3.10, 3.80% calcium and 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 0.60% available phosphorus.
Vitamin/Mineral supplementation (garante levels per kg of product); Vitamin A, 3,125 IU/g; Vitamin D3, 625,000IU/g; Vitamin K3, 975 mg; Vitamin B1, 1,225 mg; Vitamin B2, 2,200 mg; Vitamin B6, 2,062.500 mg; Vitamin B12, 6,250 mg; Vitamin E, 15,645IU; Calcium pantothenate, 14,843.750 mg; Niacin, 15,312.500 mg; Folic acid, 416.667 mg; Biotin, 62.500 mg; Choline, 81,375.00 mg; Antioxidant, 1,250 mg.
Performance of the Japanese quail in the laying phase (64–168 D of age) with levels of calcium and available phosphorus.
| Ca (%) | 1.70 | 2.40 | 3.10 | 3.80 | SE | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aP (%) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | |
| IBW (g) | 160.07 | 163.02 | 162.08 | 162.80 | 157.63 | 161.87 | 162.93 | 160.70 | 158.26 | 159.33 | 162.40 | 160.78 | 157.40 | 157.87 | 157.40 | 160.60 | 0.571 |
| FBW (g) | 174.09 | 177.86 | 177.84 | 181.33 | 174.19 | 181.05 | 172.16 | 170.73 | 172.54 | 168.26 | 173.76 | 173.56 | 171.20 | 171.98 | 171.36 | 164.88 | 0.787 |
| DFI (g/bird/day) | 32.50 | 29.55 | 30.11 | 31.61 | 29.37 | 25.56 | 25.30 | 29.97 | 28.70 | 24.54 | 24.99 | 29.10 | 30.63 | 30.37 | 29.46 | 31.52 | 0.385 |
| EP (%) | 82.80 | 86.79 | 86.62 | 88.38 | 84.17 | 96.55 | 96.82 | 93.95 | 88.37 | 96.96 | 96.81 | 87.34 | 85.00 | 88.49 | 89.33 | 83.69 | 0.770 |
| EM (g eggs/bird/day) | 7.79 | 8.86 | 9.05 | 8.75 | 8.85 | 10.87 | 10.92 | 9.97 | 9.49 | 10.53 | 10.76 | 8.99 | 8.06 | 8.93 | 8.93 | 8.04 | 0.153 |
| FCEM | 4.19 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 3.61 | 3.34 | 2.35 | 2.32 | 3.01 | 3.02 | 2.33 | 2.32 | 3.24 | 3.81 | 3.40 | 3.30 | 3.92 | 0.087 |
| FCDZ | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.012 |
| Viability (%) | 96.67 | 90.00 | 100.00 | 96.67 | 80.00 | 96.67 | 100.00 | 83.33 | 90.00 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 90.00 | 96.67 | 100.00 | 96.67 | 90.00 | 1.412 |
| Age at first egg (days) | 48.00 | 49.67 | 48.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 46.67 | 47.67 | 50.33 | 49.00 | 51.33 | 48.67 | 53.33 | 49.00 | 50.33 | 51.67 | 0.580 |
Abbreviations: aP, available phosphorus; DFI, daily feed intake; EM, egg mass; EP, egg production; FBW, final body weight; FCDZ, feed conversion ratio per dozen egg; FCEM, feed conversion ratio per egg mass IBW, initial body weight; L, linear effect; NS, nonsignicant; Q, quadratic effect.
Figure 1Overlapping contour graph of daily feed intake (DFI), egg production (EP), egg mass (EM), feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM), and feed conversion ratio per dozen egg (FCDZ) indicating the estimated levels of calcium and available phosphorus (aP) of Japanese laying quails.
Egg quality of the Japanese quail in the laying phase (64–168 D of age) with levels of calcium and available phosphorus.
| Ca (%) | 1.70 | 2.40 | 3.10 | 3.80 | SE | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aP (%) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | |
| SG (g/mL) | 1.072 | 1.066 | 1.077 | 1.070 | 1.071 | 1.072 | 1.074 | 1.071 | 1.073 | 1.070 | 1.064 | 1.072 | 1.069 | 1.074 | 1.077 | 1.077 | 0.001 |
| Haugh units | 91.39 | 93.82 | 94.33 | 90.75 | 93.94 | 95.72 | 95.44 | 94.06 | 93.45 | 95.94 | 96.47 | 93.77 | 91.48 | 93.60 | 93.89 | 92.02 | 0.275 |
| Yolk Index | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.002 |
| EW (g) | 9.40 | 10.21 | 10.45 | 9.90 | 10.50 | 11.26 | 11.28 | 10.61 | 10.74 | 10.86 | 11.12 | 10.30 | 9.48 | 10.10 | 9.99 | 9.62 | 0.093 |
| % Yolk | 30.70 | 31.36 | 31.25 | 30.82 | 30.49 | 31.31 | 30.69 | 30.61 | 30.26 | 31.24 | 30.85 | 30.70 | 30.43 | 30.40 | 30.63 | 30.53 | 0.080 |
| % Albumen | 62.13 | 62.13 | 61.72 | 61.97 | 62.19 | 61.22 | 61.90 | 61.92 | 62.28 | 61.54 | 61.60 | 61.71 | 62.15 | 61.90 | 61.58 | 61.83 | 0.103 |
| % Shell | 6.68 | 7.05 | 6.96 | 6.71 | 7.33 | 7.92 | 7.88 | 7.46 | 7.47 | 7.88 | 7.72 | 7.55 | 7.13 | 7.70 | 7.68 | 7.30 | 0.060 |
| SWUSA | 3.15 | 3.63 | 3.62 | 3.21 | 3.73 | 3.96 | 3.90 | 3.81 | 3.83 | 3.97 | 3.90 | 3.81 | 3.18 | 3.94 | 3.91 | 3.52 | 0.041 |
| ST (mm) | 0.187 | 0.209 | 0.207 | 0.187 | 0.220 | 0.224 | 0.220 | 0.220 | 0.219 | 0.232 | 0.206 | 0.218 | 0.201 | 0.206 | 0.224 | 0.211 | 0.002 |
| MM (%DM) | 67.63 | 77.55 | 83.46 | 69.87 | 83.03 | 87.22 | 86.73 | 76.24 | 78.66 | 83.37 | 82.40 | 85.00 | 69.77 | 79.74 | 76.51 | 71.35 | 1.024 |
| Ca shell (%DM) | 31.56 | 36.40 | 37.85 | 31.50 | 34.32 | 38.14 | 37.07 | 38.11 | 35.52 | 37.40 | 39.53 | 37.03 | 36.61 | 37.54 | 38.15 | 41.34 | 0.451 |
Abbreviations: aP, available phosphorus; EW, egg weight; L, linear effect; MM, mineral matter; Q, quadratic effect; SG, specific gravity; ST, shell thickness; SWUSA, shell weight per unit of surface area.
Serum biochemical profile of the Japanese quail in the laying phase (64–168 D of age) with levels of calcium and available phosphorus.
| Ca (%) | 1.70 | 2.40 | 3.10 | 3.80 | SEA | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aP (%) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | |
| TP (g/dL) | 4.15 | 3.98 | 4.28 | 4.43 | 4.17 | 4.57 | 4.30 | 4.12 | 4.62 | 4.25 | 3.79 | 4.36 | 4.48 | 4.48 | 4.22 | 4.38 | 0.049 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 1.35 | 1.50 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.18 | 1.33 | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 1.25 | 1.30 | 1.56 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 0.019 |
| AP (U/L) | 607.5 | 783.3 | 576.7 | 365.7 | 475.2 | 705.3 | 625.5 | 533.3 | 374.8 | 690.5 | 613.4 | 579.7 | 494.2 | 897.8 | 548.5 | 273.5 | 23.896 |
| Ionic Ca (mg/dL) | 7.45 | 9.46 | 9.34 | 8.86 | 8.73 | 8.72 | 8.41 | 8.17 | 9.68 | 9.00 | 7.75 | 8.68 | 7.86 | 11.00 | 9.05 | 8.56 | 0.141 |
| Total Ca (mg/dL) | 14.63 | 16.78 | 17.63 | 17.76 | 16.90 | 15.98 | 16.62 | 15.80 | 18.57 | 18.33 | 16.33 | 16.38 | 15.78 | 20.61 | 20.96 | 17.05 | 0.289 |
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 7.72 | 7.93 | 9.98 | 9.42 | 10.12 | 11.98 | 8.03 | 6.83 | 12.02 | 11.12 | 11.80 | 10.62 | 10.39 | 8.59 | 8.07 | 9.43 | 0.257 |
Abbreviations: AP, alkaline phosphatase; L, linear effect; TP, total protein.
Bone variables of the Japanese quail in the laying phase (64–168 D of age) with levels of calcium and available phosphorus.
| Ca (%) | 1.70 | 2.40 | 3.10 | 3.80 | SEA | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aP (%) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.60 | |
| Femur | |||||||||||||||||
| SI (mg/mm) | 12.50 | 13.13 | 14.40 | 12.41 | 13.67 | 14.74 | 14.71 | 12.89 | 14.85 | 15.67 | 15.45 | 14.41 | 12.76 | 13.25 | 13.1 | 13.11 | 0.170 |
| BD (mm Eq/Al) | 1.85 | 1.82 | 1.95 | 1.82 | 1.96 | 2.04 | 2.04 | 1.95 | 1.98 | 2.01 | 2.02 | 2.09 | 1.73 | 1.81 | 1.92 | 1.93 | 0.020 |
| BR (kgf) | 26.47 | 38.03 | 35.67 | 36.00 | 37.7 | 32.48 | 42.97 | 39.44 | 38.75 | 45.79 | 43.11 | 43.73 | 41.37 | 35.36 | 34.85 | 35.27 | 0.790 |
| MM (%DM) | 49.76 | 56.73 | 58.33 | 52.48 | 60.67 | 63.56 | 60.75 | 57.55 | 59.83 | 60.02 | 61.11 | 58.85 | 54.71 | 55.22 | 55.99 | 52.64 | 0.590 |
| CCa (%DM) | 19.32 | 22.43 | 19.64 | 23.32 | 23.92 | 22.8 | 21.84 | 23.75 | 22.19 | 22.86 | 23.76 | 24.60 | 21.00 | 21.11 | 22.91 | 23.3 | 0.260 |
| CP (%DM) | 10.55 | 10.64 | 10.23 | 10.32 | 10.36 | 10.47 | 10.52 | 10.64 | 10.2 | 10.72 | 11.17 | 10.30 | 9.55 | 9.57 | 9.91 | 9.71 | 0.070 |
| Tibiotarsus | |||||||||||||||||
| SI (mg/mm) | 10.87 | 11.32 | 13.16 | 11.92 | 11.43 | 13.36 | 12.61 | 12.87 | 12.18 | 12.93 | 13.49 | 12.3 | 11.37 | 11.52 | 11.69 | 10.77 | 0.14 |
| BD (mm Eq/Al) | 1.87 | 1.83 | 2.05 | 1.82 | 1.88 | 1.93 | 1.92 | 1.98 | 1.94 | 2.02 | 1.94 | 2.10 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 2.03 | 1.98 | 0.01 |
| BR (kgf) | 31.32 | 34.18 | 33.01 | 32.62 | 46.38 | 36.91 | 41.87 | 35.68 | 42.99 | 44.17 | 41.18 | 43.72 | 36.24 | 44.84 | 46.31 | 34.91 | 0.80 |
| MM (%DM) | 55.30 | 60.33 | 59.97 | 58.07 | 60.36 | 56.95 | 60.7 | 56.71 | 54.42 | 55.09 | 56.8 | 57.64 | 54.93 | 55.69 | 55.01 | 58.5 | 0.40 |
| CCa (%DM) | 22.79 | 16.91 | 12.85 | 21.61 | 26.85 | 22.72 | 19.6 | 26.11 | 25.19 | 21.97 | 23.88 | 22.16 | 22.88 | 24.82 | 23.72 | 23.9 | 0.49 |
| CP (%DM) | 10.07 | 10.40 | 10.28 | 10.20 | 10.47 | 10.77 | 10.66 | 10.67 | 10.44 | 10.45 | 11.10 | 10.53 | 9.30 | 9.40 | 10.13 | 9.74 | 0.08 |
Abbreviations: BD, bone density; BR, bone resistance; CCA, concentration of calcium; CP, concentration of phosphorus; L, linear effect; MM, mineral matter; NS, nonsignificant; Q, quadratic effect; SI, Seedor index.