Marco Ladetto1, Sergio Cortelazzo2, Simone Ferrero3, Andrea Evangelista4, Michael Mian5, Rita Tavarozzi6, Manuela Zanni6, Federica Cavallo3, Alice Di Rocco7, Vittorio Stefoni8, Chiara Pagani9, Alessandro Re9, Annalisa Chiappella10, Monica Balzarotti11, Vittorio R Zilioli12, Maria Gomes da Silva13, Luca Arcaini14, Anna L Molinari15, Filippo Ballerini16, Andrés J M Ferreri17, Benedetta Puccini18, Fabio Benedetti19, Piero M Stefani20, Franco Narni21, Ivana Casaroli22, Caterina Stelitano23, Giovannino Ciccone4, Umberto Vitolo10, Maurizio Martelli7. 1. Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy. Electronic address: marco.ladetto@ospedale.al.it. 2. Unit of Oncology-Haematology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy. 3. Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Centre for Cancer Prevention Piemonte, Torino, Italy. 4. Clinical Epidemiology, Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Centre for Cancer Prevention Piemonte, Torino, Italy. 5. Department of Haematology and CBMT, Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy. 6. Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy. 7. Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy. 8. Institute of Haematology L. e A. Seràgnoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 9. Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy. 10. Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Centre for Cancer Prevention Piemonte, Torino, Italy. 11. Haematology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS - Rozzano, Milano, Italy. 12. Division of Haematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy. 13. Haematology Unit, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal. 14. Division of Haematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo and Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 15. Department of Haematology, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy. 16. University of Genoa, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia, Genova, Italy. 17. Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-Haematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy. 18. Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy. 19. Haematology University Division, Verona Hospital, Verona, Italy. 20. SC di Ematologia - Presidio Ospedaliero Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy. 21. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Haematology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, Italy. 22. Haematology Unit, ASST Monza San Gerardo, Monza, Italy. 23. Department of Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma aged 18-65 years are usually given cytarabine and rituximab-based induction regimens followed by autologous haematopoetic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated whether post-autologous HSCT maintenance with lenalidomide improves progression-free survival in this population. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done at 49 haematology and oncology units in Italy and Portugal. Eligible patients had Ann Arbor stage III or IV treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (or stage II plus bulky disease [≥5 cm] or B symptoms), and had evidence of cyclin D1 overexpression or the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32). Patients were aged 18-59 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-3, or aged 60-65 years with ECOG 0-2. After an optional prephase with vincristine and steroids (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1, oral prednisone 100 mg [total dose] on days 1-5), patients were given three courses of R-CHOP (21-day cycle, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1; intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1·4 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 2; oral prednisone 100 mg/m2 on day 2-6). Patients then received one cycle of high-dose CTX (intravenous cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 on day 1, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 4). After restaging, patients received two cycles of R-HD-cytarabine (high-dose intravenous cytarabine 2 g/m2 every 12 h on days 1-3, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 4 and 10). Patients with complete remission or partial remission proceeded to autologous HSCT and responding patients (complete remission or partial remission) with haematological recovery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 24 courses of oral lenalidomide maintenance (15 mg per day for patients with platelets >100 × 109 cells per L or 10 mg per day for platelets 60-100 × 109 cells per L, days 1-21 every 28 days) for 24 months, or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured in the randomised population. This study is registered with EudraCT (2009-012807-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02354313). FINDINGS:Between May 4, 2010, and Aug 24, 2015, 303 patients were screened for inclusion and 300 patients were enrolled (median age 57 years, IQR 51-62; 235 [78%] male). 95 patients were excluded before randomisation, mostly due to disease progression, adverse events, and inadequate recovery. 104 patients were randomly assigned to the lenalidomide maintenance group and 101 patients to the observation group. 11 (11%) of 104 patients assigned to lenalidomide did not start treatment (3 withdrew, 6 adverse events or protocol breach, 2 lost to follow-up). At a median follow-up of 38 months after randomisation (IQR 24-50), 3-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% CI 70-87) in the lenalidomide group versus 64% (53-73) in the observation group (log-rank test p=0·012; hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·30-0·87). 41 (39%) of 104 patients discontinued lenalidomide for reasons including death or progression. Treatment-related deaths were recorded in two (2%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group (1 pneumonia, 1 thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and one (1%) of 101 in the observation group (pneumonia). 59 (63%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events versus 12 (12%) of 101 patients in the observation group (p<0·0001). 29 (31%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group and eight (8%) of 101 patients in the observation group had grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events (p<0·0001), of which infections were the most common.Serious adverse events were reported in 22 (24%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group and five (5%) of 101 patients in the observation group. Pneumonia and other infections were the most common serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Despite non-negligibile toxicity, lenalidomide after autologous HSCT improved progression-free survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma, highlighting the role of maintenance in mantle cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Fondazione Italiana Linfomi and Celgene.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma aged 18-65 years are usually given cytarabine and rituximab-based induction regimens followed by autologous haematopoetic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated whether post-autologous HSCT maintenance with lenalidomide improves progression-free survival in this population. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done at 49 haematology and oncology units in Italy and Portugal. Eligible patients had Ann Arbor stage III or IV treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (or stage II plus bulky disease [≥5 cm] or B symptoms), and had evidence of cyclin D1 overexpression or the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32). Patients were aged 18-59 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-3, or aged 60-65 years with ECOG 0-2. After an optional prephase with vincristine and steroids (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1, oral prednisone 100 mg [total dose] on days 1-5), patients were given three courses of R-CHOP (21-day cycle, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1; intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1·4 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 2; oral prednisone 100 mg/m2 on day 2-6). Patients then received one cycle of high-dose CTX (intravenous cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 on day 1, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 4). After restaging, patients received two cycles of R-HD-cytarabine (high-dose intravenous cytarabine 2 g/m2 every 12 h on days 1-3, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 4 and 10). Patients with complete remission or partial remission proceeded to autologous HSCT and responding patients (complete remission or partial remission) with haematological recovery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 24 courses of oral lenalidomide maintenance (15 mg per day for patients with platelets >100 × 109 cells per L or 10 mg per day for platelets 60-100 × 109 cells per L, days 1-21 every 28 days) for 24 months, or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured in the randomised population. This study is registered with EudraCT (2009-012807-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02354313). FINDINGS: Between May 4, 2010, and Aug 24, 2015, 303 patients were screened for inclusion and 300 patients were enrolled (median age 57 years, IQR 51-62; 235 [78%] male). 95 patients were excluded before randomisation, mostly due to disease progression, adverse events, and inadequate recovery. 104 patients were randomly assigned to the lenalidomide maintenance group and 101 patients to the observation group. 11 (11%) of 104 patients assigned to lenalidomide did not start treatment (3 withdrew, 6 adverse events or protocol breach, 2 lost to follow-up). At a median follow-up of 38 months after randomisation (IQR 24-50), 3-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% CI 70-87) in the lenalidomide group versus 64% (53-73) in the observation group (log-rank test p=0·012; hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·30-0·87). 41 (39%) of 104 patients discontinued lenalidomide for reasons including death or progression. Treatment-related deaths were recorded in two (2%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group (1 pneumonia, 1 thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and one (1%) of 101 in the observation group (pneumonia). 59 (63%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events versus 12 (12%) of 101 patients in the observation group (p<0·0001). 29 (31%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group and eight (8%) of 101 patients in the observation group had grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events (p<0·0001), of which infections were the most common.Serious adverse events were reported in 22 (24%) of 93 patients in the lenalidomide group and five (5%) of 101 patients in the observation group. Pneumonia and other infections were the most common serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Despite non-negligibile toxicity, lenalidomide after autologous HSCT improved progression-free survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma, highlighting the role of maintenance in mantle cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Fondazione Italiana Linfomi and Celgene.