Literature DB >> 33357465

Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid haemorrhage (ULTRA): a randomised controlled trial.

René Post1, Menno R Germans2, Maud A Tjerkstra3, Mervyn D I Vergouwen4, Korné Jellema5, Radboud W Koot6, Nyika D Kruyt7, Peter W A Willems4, Jasper F C Wolfs8, Frits C de Beer9, Hans Kieft10, Dharmin Nanda9, Bram van der Pol11, Gerwin Roks12, Frank de Beer13, Patricia H A Halkes14, Loes J A Reichman15, Paul J A M Brouwers16, Renske M van den Berg-Vos17, Vincent I H Kwa17, Taco C van der Ree18, Irene Bronner19, Janneke van de Vlekkert19, Henri P Bienfait20, Hieronymus D Boogaarts21, Catharina J M Klijn22, René van den Berg23, Bert A Coert3, Janneke Horn24, Charles B L M Majoie23, Gabriël J E Rinkel4, Yvo B W E M Roos25, W Peter Vandertop3, Dagmar Verbaan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, short-term antifibrinolytic therapy with tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce the risk of rebleeding. However, whether this treatment improves clinical outcome is unclear. We investigated whether ultra-early, short-term treatment with tranexamic acid improves clinical outcome at 6 months.
METHODS: In this multicentre prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label trial with masked outcome assessment, adult patients with spontaneous CT-proven subarachnoid haemorrhage in eight treatment centres and 16 referring hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to treatment with tranexamic acid in addition to care as usual (tranexamic acid group) or care as usual only (control group). Tranexamic acid was started immediately after diagnosis in the presenting hospital (1 g bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 1 g every 8 h, terminated immediately before aneurysm treatment, or 24 h after start of the medication, whichever came first). The primary endpoint was clinical outcome at 6 months, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomised into a good (0-3) or poor (4-6) clinical outcome. Both primary and safety analyses were according to intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02684812.
FINDINGS: Between July 24, 2013, and July 29, 2019, we enrolled 955 patients; 480 patients were randomly assigned to tranexamic acid and 475 patients to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, good clinical outcome was observed in 287 (60%) of 475 patients in the tranexamic acid group, and 300 (64%) of 470 patients in the control group (treatment centre adjusted odds ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·66-1·12). Rebleeding after randomisation and before aneurysm treatment occurred in 49 (10%) patients in the tranexamic acid and in 66 (14%) patients in the control group (odds ratio 0·71, 95% CI 0·48-1·04). Other serious adverse events were comparable between groups.
INTERPRETATION: In patients with CT-proven subarachnoid haemorrhage, presumably caused by a ruptured aneurysm, ultra-early, short-term tranexamic acid treatment did not improve clinical outcome at 6 months, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale. FUNDING: Fonds NutsOhra.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357465     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32518-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  17 in total

1.  [Neurosurgical intensive care medicine : Intensive medical care studies from 2020/2021].

Authors:  C Beynon; M Bernhard; T Brenner; M Dietrich; M O Fiedler; C Nusshag; M A Weigand; C J Reuß; D Michalski; C Jungk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Re-Evaluating the Effect of Preoperative Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss and Field Quality During Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sayed Lotfollah Afzali; Hesam Panahi; Forouzan Ganji; Sanaz Ziaei; Nahad Sedaghat
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  Appraising the use of tranexamic acid in traumatic and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: A narrative review.

Authors:  Nicholas D Jakowenko; Brian J Kopp; Brian L Erstad
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  David Y Chung; Mohamad Abdalkader; Thanh N Nguyen
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 5.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sima Patel; Amay Parikh; Okorie Nduka Okorie
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  Commentary on Post, et al. Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2021.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Lo; Hitoshi Fukuda; Anderson C O Tsang; David J Langer; Satoru Miyawaki; Masaomi Koyanagi; Matthew Wai-Man Lui
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-04-14

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Min Shi; Chao Yang; Zu-Han Chen; Ling-Fei Xiao; Wen-Yuan Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 8.  An Update on Antioxidative Stress Therapy Research for Early Brain Injury After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Fa Lin; Runting Li; Wen-Jun Tu; Yu Chen; Ke Wang; Xiaolin Chen; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Tranexamic Acid Is Not a Universal Hemostatic Agent.

Authors:  Roger E G Schutgens; Ton Lisman
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2021-07-19

Review 10.  Tranexamic acid evidence and controversies: An illustrated review.

Authors:  Nicole Relke; Nicholas L J Chornenki; Michelle Sholzberg
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.