Literature DB >> 33357321

Ready to Go Home? Assessment of Shared Mental Models of the Patient and Discharging Team Regarding Readiness for Hospital Discharge.

Kirstin A Manges1, Andrea S Wallace2, Patricia S Groves3, Marilyn M Schapira4,5, Robert E Burke4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A critical task of the inpatient interprofessional team is readying patients for discharge. Assessment of shared mental model (SMM) convergence can determine how much team members agree about patient discharge readiness and how their mental models align with the patient's self-assessment.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the convergence of interprofessional team SMMs of hospital discharge readiness and identify factors associated with these assessments.
DESIGN: We surveyed interprofessional discharging teams and each team's patient at time of hospital discharge using validated tools to capture their SMMs. PARTICIPANTS: Discharge events (N = 64) from a single hospital consisting of the patient and their team (nurse, coordinator, physician). MEASURES: Clinician and patient versions of the validated Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scales/Short Form (RHDS/SF). We measured team convergence by comparing the individual clinicians' scores on the RHDS/SF, and we measured team-patient convergence as the absolute difference between the Patient-RHDS/SF score and the team average score on the Clinician-RHDS/SF.
RESULTS: Discharging teams assessed patients as having high readiness for hospital discharge (mean score, 8.5 out of 10; SD, 0.91). The majority of teams had convergent SMMs with high to very high interrater agreement on discharge readiness (mean r*wg(J), 0.90; SD, 0.10). However, team-patient SMM convergence was low: Teams overestimated the patient's self-assessment of readiness for discharge in 48.4% of events. We found that teams reporting higher-quality teamwork (P = .004) and bachelor's level-trained nurses (P < .001) had more convergent SMMs with the patient.
CONCLUSION: Measuring discharge teams' SMM of patient discharge readiness may represent an innovative assessment tool and potential lever to improve the quality of care transitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33357321      PMCID: PMC8025658          DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.899


  32 in total

1.  Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches.

Authors:  J Langan-Fox; S Code; K Langfield-Smith
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Association of Hospitalist Years of Experience With Mortality in the Hospitalized Medicare Population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Habeeb Salameh; Jie Zhou; Siddhartha Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  A qualitative study of expert and team cognition on complex patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jason W Custer; Elizabeth White; James C Fackler; Yan Xiao; Allen Tien; Harold Lehmann; David G Nichols
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Networks of hospital discharge planning teams and readmissions.

Authors:  Beth Prusaczyk; Sunil Kripalani; Amar Dhand
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.338

5.  Validation of the Registered Nurse Assessment of Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale.

Authors:  Kathleen L Bobay; Marianne E Weiss; Debra Oswald; Olga Yakusheva
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Cognitive Biases Influence Decision-Making Regarding Postacute Care in a Skilled Nursing Facility.

Authors:  Robert E Burke; Chelsea Leonard; Marcie Lee; Roman Ayele; Ethan Cumbler; Rebecca Allyn; S Ryan Greysen
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 7.  Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Amy T Jackson; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Eric A Coleman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry; Geeta Singhal; Sílvia Mamede
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 9.  An Overview of Interrater Agreement on Likert Scales for Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Thomas A O'Neill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-12

10.  A qualitative study of professional and carer perceptions of the threats to safe hospital discharge for stroke and hip fracture patients in the English National Health Service.

Authors:  Justin Waring; Simon Bishop; Fiona Marshall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  3 in total

1.  Caregiver Inclusion in IDEAL Discharge Teaching: Implications for Transitions From Hospital to Home.

Authors:  Emily Wahlquist Topham; Alycia Bristol; Brenda Luther; Catherine E Elmore; Erin Johnson; Andrea S Wallace
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug 01

2.  Are You Thinking What I'm Thinking? The Case for Shared Mental Models in Hospital Discharges.

Authors:  Amanda P Bettencourt; Amanda C Schondelmeyer
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews.

Authors:  Richard H Parrish; Heather Monk Bodenstab; Dustin Carneal; Ryan M Cassity; William E Dager; Sara J Hyland; Jenna K Lovely; Alyssa Pollock; Tracy M Sparkes; Siu-Fun Wong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.