Literature DB >> 3335728

Reduction of urinary incontinence in nursing homes: does it reduce or increase costs?

J F Schnelle1, V A Sowell, T W Hu, B Traughber.   

Abstract

Labor and supply costs associated with the care of urinary incontinent patients in three nursing homes were measured. First, normal nursing home changing patterns and their associated costs were measured. Second, the costs were documented when patients were checked by research staff and changed on an hourly basis as needed. Nursing home staff changed patients significantly less frequently than patient voiding as detected by the hourly checking system. Thus, cost of incontinence during the hourly checking condition ($3.35) per 12-hour patient-day was significantly higher than the cost normally incurred in nursing homes ($1.52) per 12-hour patient-day. The cost of an incontinence rehabilitation program, which significantly reduced incontinence episodes, was contrasted to the cost of incontinence as measured under both of the previous conditions. The rehabilitation program produced significant labor and supply savings only when compared with the hourly checking and changing system. Maintaining patients in a more continent condition costs significantly more than the direct incontinence cost normally incurred by the nursing home. Quality of life and other second-order benefits must be considered if continence rehabilitation is to be judged cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3335728     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb03431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  13 in total

1.  The costs of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  C M Callahan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Minimising the cost of urinary incontinence in nursing homes.

Authors:  J Steel; D Fonda
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Medical care of the elderly in the nursing home.

Authors:  P Starer; L S Libow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A cost-effectiveness study of the management of intractable urinary incontinence by urinary catheterisation or incontinence pads.

Authors:  M E McMurdo; P G Davey; M A Elder; R M Miller; D C Old; M Malek
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Pressure sores in the elderly: can this outcome be improved?

Authors:  D M Smith; D K Winsemius; R W Besdine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A staff management system for maintaining improvements in continence with elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  L D Burgio; B T Engel; A Hawkins; K McCormick; A Scheve; L T Jones
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

Review 7.  Urinary incontinence in the elderly. Causes and treatment options.

Authors:  S Z Nasr; J G Ouslander
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  J Ostaszkiewicz; L Johnston; B Roe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  J Ostaszkiewicz; L Johnston; B Roe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Cost of stress urinary incontinence: a claims data analysis.

Authors:  Howard G Birnbaum; Stephanie A Leong; Emily F Oster; Kraig Kinchen; Peter Sun
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.