Literature DB >> 33357123

Impact of utilizing solid recovered fuel on the global warming potential of cement production and waste management system: A life cycle assessment approach.

Md Musharof Hussain Khan1, Jouni Havukainen1, Mika Horttanainen1.   

Abstract

Cement production is responsible for a significant share of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A potential option to reduce the cement production emissions is to use alternative fuels which can have also an impact on emissions from the waste management sector. This work investigates the change in global warming potential (GWP) of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production and affected waste management systems when conventional fuels are partially replaced by solid recovered fuel (SRF) made from commercial and industrial waste (C&IW). A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted with a functional unit of 1 metric tonne of OPC production and treatment of 194 kg of C&IW. Data from an existing cement plant have been used, where the share of SRF from total fuel energy demand increased from 0% to 53% between 2007 and 2016. Four scenarios were established with varying waste treatment methods and SRF share in the thermal energy mix of cement production. It was found that GHG emissions decreased by 20% from 1036 kg carbon dioxide (CO2), eq. (functional unit)-1 in Scenario 1 to 832 kg CO2, eq. (functional unit)-1 in Scenario 3. Furthermore, it is possible to reach a reduction of 30% to 725 kg CO2, eq. (functional unit)-1 in Scenario by increasing the share of SRF to 80%. In conclusion, significant GHG emissions reduction can be achieved by utilizing SRF in cement production. Especially in the middle-income and low-income countries where waste is dumped to the open landfills, emissions could be reduced without huge investments to waste incineration plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Waste management; alternative fuel; cement production; emission reduction; global warming potential; life cycle assessment; solid recovered fuel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357123      PMCID: PMC7952896          DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20978277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  5 in total

1.  Climate impact analysis of waste treatment scenarios--thermal treatment of commercial and pretreated waste versus landfilling in Austria.

Authors:  A M Ragossnig; C Wartha; R Pomberger
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2009-09-11

2.  Life cycle assessment of the use of alternative fuels in cement kilns: A case study.

Authors:  Martha Georgiopoulou; Gerasimos Lyberatos
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  The comparison of fossil carbon fraction and greenhouse gas emissions through an analysis of exhaust gases from urban solid waste incineration facilities.

Authors:  Seungjin Kim; Seongmin Kang; Jeongwoo Lee; Seehyung Lee; Ki-Hyun Kim; Eui-Chan Jeon
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Greenhouse gas emissions of different waste treatment options for sector-specific commercial and industrial waste in Germany.

Authors:  Markus Helftewes; Sabine Flamme; Michael Nelles
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2012-03-26

5.  Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial waste.

Authors:  Muhammad Nasrullah; Pasi Vainikka; Janne Hannula; Markku Hurme; Janne Kärki
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.145

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Thermal Recycling Process as an Alternative to Existing CFRP and GFRP Composite Wastes Management Options.

Authors:  Sankar Karuppannan Gopalraj; Ivan Deviatkin; Mika Horttanainen; Timo Kärki
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.329

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.