BACKGROUND: Adverse health effects among agricultural workers due to chronic heat exposure have been characterized in the literature as not only due to high ambient temperatures but also due to intensive manual labor in hot and humid conditions. The aim of this study was to use biomonitoring equipment to examine the effectiveness of selected cooling devices at preventing agricultural workers from exceeding the core body temperature threshold of 38.0°C (Tc38) and attenuating heat-related illness symptoms. METHODS: A convenience sample of 84 agricultural workers in Florida was randomized to one of four groups: (a) no intervention, clothing as usual; (b) cooling bandana; (c) cooling vest; and (d) both the cooling bandana and cooling vest. Biomonitoring equipment worn by the participants included core body temperature monitor and an accelerometer to capture physical activity. FINDINGS: A total of 78 agricultural workers completed one intervention workday trial. Compared with the control group, the bandana group had lower odds of exceeding Tc38 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.7, 90% confidence interval [CI] = [0.2, 3.2]) and the vest group had higher odds of exceeding Tc38 (OR = 1.8, 90% CI = [0.4, 7.9]). The simultaneous use of cooling vest and bandana showed an effect little different from the control group (OR = 1.3, 90% CI = [0.3, 5.6]). CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: This is the first field-based study to examine cooling intervention among agricultural workers in the United States using biomonitoring equipment. This study found that using a bandana while working in a hot agricultural environment has the potential to be protective against exceeding the recommended Tc38 threshold.
BACKGROUND: Adverse health effects among agricultural workers due to chronic heat exposure have been characterized in the literature as not only due to high ambient temperatures but also due to intensive manual labor in hot and humid conditions. The aim of this study was to use biomonitoring equipment to examine the effectiveness of selected cooling devices at preventing agricultural workers from exceeding the core body temperature threshold of 38.0°C (Tc38) and attenuating heat-related illness symptoms. METHODS: A convenience sample of 84 agricultural workers in Florida was randomized to one of four groups: (a) no intervention, clothing as usual; (b) cooling bandana; (c) cooling vest; and (d) both the cooling bandana and cooling vest. Biomonitoring equipment worn by the participants included core body temperature monitor and an accelerometer to capture physical activity. FINDINGS: A total of 78 agricultural workers completed one intervention workday trial. Compared with the control group, the bandana group had lower odds of exceeding Tc38 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.7, 90% confidence interval [CI] = [0.2, 3.2]) and the vest group had higher odds of exceeding Tc38 (OR = 1.8, 90% CI = [0.4, 7.9]). The simultaneous use of cooling vest and bandana showed an effect little different from the control group (OR = 1.3, 90% CI = [0.3, 5.6]). CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: This is the first field-based study to examine cooling intervention among agricultural workers in the United States using biomonitoring equipment. This study found that using a bandana while working in a hot agricultural environment has the potential to be protective against exceeding the recommended Tc38 threshold.
Authors: Jacqueline M Mix; Lisa Elon; Valerie Vi Thein Mac; Joan Flocks; Jeannie Economos; Antonio J Tovar-Aguilar; Vicki S Hertzberg; Linda A McCauley Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Abby D Mutic; Jacqueline M Mix; Lisa Elon; Nathan J Mutic; Jeannie Economos; Joan Flocks; Antonio J Tovar-Aguilar; Linda A McCauley Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; Hope M Tiesman; Jeri Sumitani; Terry Mize; Kumar Kartik Amarnath; A Rana Bayakly; Matthew W Murphy Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Maria C Mirabelli; Sara A Quandt; Rebecca Crain; Joseph G Grzywacz; Erin N Robinson; Quirina M Vallejos; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Valerie Vi Thien Mac; Jose Antonio Tovar-Aguilar; Joan Flocks; Eugenia Economos; Vicki S Hertzberg; Linda A McCauley Journal: J Agromedicine Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Diane C Mitchell; Javier Castro; Tracey L Armitage; Alondra J Vega-Arroyo; Sally C Moyce; Daniel J Tancredi; Deborah H Bennett; James H Jones; Tord Kjellstrom; Marc B Schenker Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Roxana Chicas; Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli; Nathan Eric Dickman; Joan Flocks; Madeleine K Scammell; Kyle Steenland; Vicki Hertzberg; Linda McCauley Journal: Hisp Health Care Int Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Erica Chavez Santos; June T Spector; Jared Egbert; Jennifer Krenz; Paul D Sampson; Pablo Palmández; Elizabeth Torres; Maria Blancas; Jose Carmona; Jihoon Jung; John C Flunker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Jennifer Krenz; Erica Chavez Santos; Elizabeth Torres; Pablo Palmández; Jose Carmona; Maria Blancas; Diana Marquez; Paul Sampson; June T Spector Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-06-08