Eilidh Cowan1, Lucia D'Ambruoso2,3,4,5, Maria van der Merwe6, Sophie Witter7, Peter Byass2,3,4, Soter Ameh8,9, Ryan G Wagner3,4,10, Rhian Twine4. 1. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK. 2. Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK. 3. Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University , Umeå, Sweden. 4. MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit [Agincourt], School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa. 5. National Health Service , Grampian, UK. 6. Independent Public Health and Nutrition Consultant , Nelspruit, South Africa. 7. Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh , Musselburgh, UK. 8. Department of Community Medicine, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar , Calabar, Nigeria. 9. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University , Boston, MA, USA. 10. Studies of Epidemiology of Epilepsy in Demographic Surveillance Systems (SEEDS) - INDEPTH Network , Accra, Ghana.
Abstract
Background: NCDs are non-infectious, long-term conditions that account for 40 million deaths per annum. 87% of premature NCD mortality occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: The aims were:develop methods to provide integrated biosocial accounts of NCD mortality; and explore the practical utility of extended mortality data for the primary health care system. Methods: We drew on data from research programmes in the study area. Data were analysed in three steps: [a]analysis of levels, causes and circumstances of NCD mortality [n = 4,166] from routine census updates including Verbal Autopsy and of qualitative data on lived experiences of NCDs in rural villages from participatory research; [b] identifying areas of convergence and divergence between the analyses; and [c]exploration of the practical relevance of the data drawing on engagements with health systems stakeholders. Results: NCDs constituted a significant proportion of mortality in this setting [36%]. VA data revealed multiple barriers to access in end-of-life care. Many deaths were attributed to problems with resources and health systems [21%;19% respectively]. The qualitative research provided rich complementary detail on the processes through which risk originates, accumulates and is expressed in access to end-of-life care, related to chronic poverty and perceptions of poor quality care in clinics. The exploration of practical relevance revealed chronic under-funding for NCD services, and an acute need for robust, timely data on the NCD burden. Conclusions: VA data allowed a significant burden of NCD mortality to be quantified and revealed barriers to access at and around the time of death. Qualitative research contextualised these barriers, providing explanations of how and why they exist and persist. Health systems analysis revealed shortages of resources allocated to NCDs and a need for robust research to provide locally relevant evidence to organise and deliver care. Pragmatic interdisciplinary and mixed method analysis provides relevant renditions of complex problems to inform more effective responses.
Background: NCDs are non-infectious, long-term conditions that account for 40 million deaths per annum. 87% of premature NCD mortality occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: The aims were:develop methods to provide integrated biosocial accounts of NCD mortality; and explore the practical utility of extended mortality data for the primary health care system. Methods: We drew on data from research programmes in the study area. Data were analysed in three steps: [a]analysis of levels, causes and circumstances of NCD mortality [n = 4,166] from routine census updates including Verbal Autopsy and of qualitative data on lived experiences of NCDs in rural villages from participatory research; [b] identifying areas of convergence and divergence between the analyses; and [c]exploration of the practical relevance of the data drawing on engagements with health systems stakeholders. Results: NCDs constituted a significant proportion of mortality in this setting [36%]. VA data revealed multiple barriers to access in end-of-life care. Many deaths were attributed to problems with resources and health systems [21%;19% respectively]. The qualitative research provided rich complementary detail on the processes through which risk originates, accumulates and is expressed in access to end-of-life care, related to chronic poverty and perceptions of poor quality care in clinics. The exploration of practical relevance revealed chronic under-funding for NCD services, and an acute need for robust, timely data on the NCD burden. Conclusions: VA data allowed a significant burden of NCD mortality to be quantified and revealed barriers to access at and around the time of death. Qualitative research contextualised these barriers, providing explanations of how and why they exist and persist. Health systems analysis revealed shortages of resources allocated to NCDs and a need for robust research to provide locally relevant evidence to organise and deliver care. Pragmatic interdisciplinary and mixed method analysis provides relevant renditions of complex problems to inform more effective responses.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-communicable diseases; South Africa; civil registration and vital statistics; participatory research; verbal autopsy
Authors: Bronwyn Harris; Jane Goudge; John E Ataguba; Diane McIntyre; Nonhlanhla Nxumalo; Siyabonga Jikwana; Matthew Chersich Journal: J Public Health Policy Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.222
Authors: Jané Joubert; Debbie Bradshaw; Chodziwadziwa Kabudula; Chalapati Rao; Kathleen Kahn; Paul Mee; Stephen Tollman; Alan D Lopez; Theo Vos Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Beatrice Nojilana; Debbie Bradshaw; Victoria Pillay-van Wyk; William Msemburi; Nontuthuzelo Somdyala; Jané D Joubert; Pamela Groenewald; Ria Laubscher; Rob E Dorrington Journal: S Afr Med J Date: 2016-04-01
Authors: Malia Duffy; Bisola Ojikutu; Soa Andrian; Elaine Sohng; Thomas Minior; Lisa R Hirschhorn Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Ryan G Wagner; Melanie Y Bertram; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Stephen M Tollman; Lars Lindholm; Charles R Newton; Karen J Hofman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Nireshni Naidoo; Jean Railton; Geoffrey Jobson; Nthabiseng Matlakala; Gert Marincowitz; James A McIntyre; Helen E Struthers; Remco P H Peters Journal: South Afr J HIV Med Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Lucia D'Ambruoso; Stephen Tollman; Kathleen Kahn; Maria Van Der Merwe; Rhian Twine; Linus Schiöler; Max Petzold; Peter Byass Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.640